Skip to main content
Log in

Heat transfer considerations in design of a batch tube reactor for biomass hydrolysis

  • Published:
Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Biologic conversion of inexpensive and abundant sources of cellulosic biomass offers a low-cost route to production of fuels and commodity chemicals that can provide unparalleled environmental, economic, and strategic benefits. However, low-cost, high-yiel technologies are needed to recover sugars from the hemicellulose fraction of biomass and to prepare the remaining cellulose fraction for subsequent hydrolysis. Uncatalyzed hemicellulose hydrolysis in flow-through systems offers a number of important advantages for removal of hemicellulose sugars, and it is believed that oligomers could play an important role in explaining why the performance of flow-through systems differs from uncatalyzed steam explosion approaches. Thus, an effort is under way to study oligomer formation kinetics, and a small batch reactor is being applied to capture these important intermediates in a closed system that facilitates material balance closure for varying reaction conditions. In this article, heat transfer for batch tubes is analyzed to derive temperature profiles for different tube diameters and assess the impact on xylan conversion. It was found that the tube diameter must be <0.5 in, for xylan hydrolysis to follow the kinetics expected for a uniform temperature system at typical operating conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lynd, L. R., Wyman, C. E., and Gerngross, T. U. (2000), Biotechnol. Prog. 15, 777–793.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Grohmann, K., Himmel, M., Rivard, C., Tucker, M., and Baker, J. (1984), Biotechnol. Bioeng. Symp. 14, 137–157.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Knappert, H., Grethlein, H., and Converse, A. O. (1980), Biotechnol. Bioeng. Symp. 11, 67–77.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lynd, L. R., Elander, R. T., and Wyman, C. E. (1996), Appl. Biochem. Bioeng. 57/58, 741–761.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Torget, R., Hatzis, C., Hayward, T. K., Hsu, T.-A., and Philippidis, G. (1996), Appl. Biochem. Bioeng. 57/58, 85–101.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Grohmann, K. and Torget, R. (1992), US Patent 5,125,977.

  7. Torget, R. and Hsu, T.-A. (1994), Appl. Biochem. Bioeng. 45/46, 5–21.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jacobsen, S. E. and Wyman, C. E. (2000), Appl. Biochem. Bioeng. 84–86, 81–96.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Saeman, J. F. (1945), Ind. Eng. Chem. 37(1), 43–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Perry, R. H. and Green, D. W., eds. (1997), Perry's Chemical Engineer's Handbook, 7th ed., McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Carslaw, H. S. and Jaeger, J. C. (1959), Conduction of Heat in Solids, 2nd ed., Clarendon, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Estaglalian, A., Hashimoto, A. G., Fenske, J. J., and Penner, M. H. (1997), Bioresour. Technol. 59, 129–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Charles E. Wyman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jacobsen, S.E., Wyman, C.E. Heat transfer considerations in design of a batch tube reactor for biomass hydrolysis. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 91, 377–386 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1385/ABAB:91-93:1-9:377

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1385/ABAB:91-93:1-9:377

Index Entries

Navigation