Skip to main content
Log in

Ethanol production in a membrane bioreactor

Pilot-scale trials in a corn wet mill

  • Published:
Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pilot plant trials were conducted in a corn wet mill with a 7000-L membrane recycle bioreactor (MRB) that integrated ceramic microfiltration membranes in a semi-closed loop configuration with a stirred-tank reactor. Residence times of 7.5–10 h with ethanol outputs of 10–11.5% (v/v) were obtained when the cell concentration was 60–100 g/L drywt of yeast, equivalent to about 109−1010 cells/mL. The performance of the membrane was dependent on the startup mode and pressure management techniques. A steady flux of 70 L/(m2·h) could be maintained for several days before cleaning was necessary. The benefits of the MRB include better productivity; a clear productstream containing no particulates or yeast cells, which should improve subsequent stripping and distillation operations; and substantially reduced stillage handling. The capital cost of the MRB is $21–$34/(m3·yr) ($0.08–$0.13/[gal·yr]) of ethanol capacity. Operating cost, including depreciation, energy, membrane replacement, maintenance, labor, and cleaning, is $4.5–9/m3 ($0.017–$0.034/gal) of ethanol.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cheryan, M. and Mehaia, M. A. (1986), CHEMTECH 16, 676–681.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Cheryan, M. (1998), Ultrafiltration and Microfiltration Handbook, Technomic, Lancaster, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cheryan, M. and Mehaia, M. A. (1984), Process Biochem. 19(6), 204–208.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Chang, H. N. and Furusaki, S. (1991), Adv. Biochem. Eng. 44, 1074–1110.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lee, S. S., Burt, A., Russotti, G., and Buckland, B. (1995), Biotechnol. Bioeng. 48, 386–400.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Tanaka, T., Kamimura, R., Itoh, K., and Nakanishi, K. (1993), Biotechnol. Bioeng. 41, 617–624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mehaia, M. A. and Cheryan, M. (1991), Enzyme Microb. Technol. 13, 257–261.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Groot, W. J., Sikkenk, C. M., Waldram, R. H., van der Lans, R. G. J. M., and Luyben, K. C. A. M. (1992), Bioproc. Eng. 8, 39–47.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Cheryan, M. and Escobar, J. M. (1993), in Proceedings, First Biomass Conference of the Americas, Volume 11, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO, pp. 1068–1077.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Patel, P. N., Mehaia, M. A., and Cheryan, M. (1987), J. Biotechnol. 5, 1–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Saglam, N. (1995), PhD thesis, University of Illinois, Urbana.

  12. Pafylias, I., Cheryan, M., Mehaia, M. A., and Saglam, N. (1996), Food Res. Int. 29, 141–146.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Munir Cheryan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Escobar, J.M., Rane, K.D. & Cheryan, M. Ethanol production in a membrane bioreactor. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 91, 283–296 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1385/ABAB:91-93:1-9:283

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1385/ABAB:91-93:1-9:283

Index Entries

Navigation