Abstract
In this article, we describe the development of a simple laboratory test for the effective screening of foam control agents on a selected fermentation system, the mass production of Yarrowia lipolytica. Aeration testing is based on sparging air in the foaming medium allowing partial reproduction of the gas-liquid hydrodynamic encountered in bioreactors. “Dynamic sparge test”, for which measurements are made during foam formation, was used to compare the capacity of three antifoams, based on different technologies, to control the foam produced in the fermentation broth. The selected foam control agents were: (1) an organic antifoam (TEGO AFKS911), (2) a siliconebased emulsion containing in situ treated silica (DC-1520) and (3) a silicone/organic blend silica-free formulation. The testing results demonstrated dramatic differences among them and showed that the capacity of TEGO AFKS911 and DC-1520 to control the foam generated in the fermentation broth decreases as a function of fermentation time. This occurred to a much lesser extent for the silicone/organic blend formulation. These results were correlated with the change of the foam nature and the increase of foam stability of the fermentation broth with culture time. The increase in protein content as a function of growth time was correlated with an increase in foam stability and antifoam consumption. A “synthetic fermentation broth” was also developed, by adding both proteins and microorganism to the culture medium. This allowed us to mimic the fermentation broth, shown by the similar antifoams behaviour, and is therefore a simple methodology useful for the selection of appropriate antifoams.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Wilde, P. and Clark, D. (1996), In: Methods of Testing Protein Functionality, Hall, G., ed., Blackie Academic & Professional, London, pp. 110–152.
Wilde, P. (2000), Curr. Opinion Colloid Interval Sci. 5, 176–181.
Sie, T. and Schügerl, K. (1983), Eur. J. Appl. Microbiol. Biotech. 17, 221–226.
Abribat, B., Molitor, J.-P., De Haut, C., Merlet, S., and Claessens, P. Patent WO 03/040699A1, Cognis, France S. A.
Hall, M., Dickinson, S., Pritchard, B., and Evans, J. (1973), Prog. Industr. Microbiol. 12, 169–234.
Destain, J., Roblain, D., and Thonart, P. (1997), Biotech. Let. 19, 105–107.
Garrett, P. (1993) In: Defoaming: Theory and Industrial Applications, Garrett, P., ed., Marcel Dekker, New York.
Lee, J. and Tynan, K. (1988), 2nd International Conference on Bioreactor Fluid Dynamics, 353–377.
Wasan, D., and Christiano, S. (1997), In: Handbook of Surface and Colloid Chemistry, Birdi, K. S., ed., CRC Press, New York.
Denkov, N. (2004), Langmuir 20, 9463–9505.
Christiano, S. and Fey, K. (2003), J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotech. 30, 13–21.
Lecomte, J.-P., Cazaroto, M., Rivs, M., and Mivrat, T. (2004), Patent PCt/2004/035370 filed on October 21, 2004.
Lowry, O., Rosebrough, N., Farr, A., and Randall, R. (1951) J. Biol. Chem. 193, 265–275.
Domingo, X., Fiquet, L., and Meijer, H. (1992), Tenside Surf. Det. 29, 16–22.
Denkov, N., Marinova, K., Hristova, H., Hadjiiski, A., and Cooper, P. (2000), Langmuir 16, 2515–2528.
Baniel, A., Fains, A., and Popineau, Y. (1997), J. Food Sci. 62, 1–5.
Razafindralambo, H., Paquot, M., Baniel, A., et al. (1997), Food Hydrocolloids 11, 59–62.
Popineau, Y., Loisel, W., Bertrand, D., and Gueguen, J. (1993) Traitement Industriel des Fluides Alimentaires Non-Newtoniens 27–29, 72–81.
Ghildya, N., Lonsane, B., and Karanth, N. (1988), Adv. Appl. Microbiol. 33, 173–222.
Schügerl, B. (1985), Proc. Biochem. 20, 122, 123.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Etoc, A., Delvigne, F., Lecomte, J.P. et al. Foam control in fermentation bioprocess. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 130, 392–404 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1385/ABAB:130:1:392
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1385/ABAB:130:1:392