Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Alkaline and peracetic acid pretreatments of biomass for ethanol production

  • Published:
Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Prehydrolysis with dilute acid and steam explosion constitute the most promising methods for improving enzymatic digestibility of biomass for ethanol production. Despite world wide acceptance, these methods of pretreatment are quite expensive considering costs for the reactor, energy, and fractionation. Using peracetic acid is a lignin-oxidation pretreatment with low-energy input by which biomass can be treated in a silo-type system without need for expensive capitalization. Experimentally, ground hybrid poplar and sugar cane bagasse are placed in plastic bags and a peracetic acid solution is added to the biomass in different concentrations based on ovendried biomass. The ratio of solution to biomass is 6∶1 and a 7-d storage period at ambient temperature (20°C) has been used. As an auxiliary method, a series of pre-pretreatments using stoichiometri camounts of sodium hydroxide and ammonium hydroxide based on 4-methyl-glucuronic acid and acetyl content in the biomass are performed before addition of peracetic acid. The basic solutions are added to the biomass in a ratio of 14∶1 solution to biomass, and mixed for 24 h at the same ambient temperature. Biomass is filtered and washed to a neutral pH before peracetic acid addition. The aforementioned procedures give high xylan content substrates as a function of the selectivity of peracetic acid for lignin oxidation and the mild conditions of the process. Consequently, xylanase/β-glucosidase combinations were more effective than cellulase preparations in hydrolyzing these materials. The pretreatment efficiency was evaluated through enzymatic hydrolysis and simultaneous saccharification and cofermentation (SSCF) tests. Peracetic ac treatment improves enzymatic digestibility of hybrid poplar and sugar cane bagasse with no need of high temperatures. Alkaline treatments are helpful in reducing peracetic acid requirements in the pretreatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Myung, K. H. and Kennelly, J. J. (1992), AJAS 5(4), 635–641.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Farid, M. A., Shaker, H. M., and El-Diwany, A. I. (1983), Enzyme Microb. Technol. 5, 421–424.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Toyama, N. and Ogawa, K. (1975), in Symposium #5, Cellulose as a Chemical Energy Resource, Wilke, C. R., ed., Wiley, New York, pp. 225–244.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lai, Y. Z. and Sarkanen, K. V. (1968), TAPPI 51(10), 449–453.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sakai, K. and Kishimoto, S. (1966), J. Jpn. Wood Res. Soc. 12(6) 310–315.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Anonymous (1996), Chem. Weck, January 3/10, p. 22.

  7. Anonymous (1995), Chem. Market. Report., December 25, p. 9.

  8. Szmant, H. H. (1989), in Organic Building Blocks of the Chemical Industry, Wiley-Interscience, Wiley, NY, pp. 236–339.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wilson, S. (1994), Chem. Ind. 7, p. 255.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ehrman, T. (1992), Chemical Analysis and Testing Standard Procedure No. 002. National Research Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ghose, T. K. (1987), Pure Appl. Chem. 59(2), 257–268.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bailey, M. J., Biely, P., and Poutanen, K. (1992), J. Biotechnol. 23, 257–270.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Burden, D. W. and Whitney, D. B. (1995), in Biotechnology: Proteins to PCR. A Course in Strategy and Lab Techniques Birkhäuser, Boston, MA, pp. 43–47.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Philippidis, G. P., Smith, T. K., and Schmidt, S. L. (1993), Chemical Analysis and Testing Standard Procedure No. 008. National Research Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Philippidis, G. P. (1996), in Handbook on Bioethanol, C. E. Wyman, ed., Taylor and Francis, Washington, DC, pp. 253–285.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang, M., Eddy, C., Deanda, K., Finkelstein, M., and Picataggio, S. (1995), Science 267, 240–243.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Brito, L. M. R. (1994), PhD thesis, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO.

  18. Schwald, W., Breuil, C., Brownell, H. H., Chan, M., and Saddler, J. N. (1989), Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 20/21, 29–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Fundação Centro Tecnológico de Minas Gerais-CETEC, Setor de Biotecnologia, Av. José Cândido da Silveira 2000, CEP 31170-000, Belo Horizonte, M.G., Brazil

    Lincoln C. Teixeira

  2. Department of Chemical and Bioresource Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO

    James C. Linden & Herbert A. Schroeder

Authors
  1. Lincoln C. Teixeira
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. James C. Linden
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Herbert A. Schroeder
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lincoln C. Teixeira.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Teixeira, L.C., Linden, J.C. & Schroeder, H.A. Alkaline and peracetic acid pretreatments of biomass for ethanol production. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 77, 19–34 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1385/ABAB:77:1-3:19

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1385/ABAB:77:1-3:19

Index Entries

Search

Navigation