Skip to main content
Log in

Enhancing cellulase foam fractionation with addition of surfactant

  • Published:
Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Foam fractionation cannot be used to recover cellulase from an aerated water solution effectively because cellulase by itself can produce only a small amount of foam. The addition of a surfactant can, however, increase the foamate volume and enhance the concentration of cellulase. We studied three detergents individually added to a 200 mg/L cellulase solution to promote foaming. These detergents were anionic, cationic, and nonionic surfactants, respectively. Although contributing to foam production, it was observed that nonionic surfactant (Pluronic F-68) barely concentrated cellulase, leaving the enrichment ratio unchanged, near 1. With anionic surfactant, sodium dedecyl sulfate, and cationic surfactant, cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB), the enrichment ratio became much larger, but cellulase denaturation occurred, reducing the activity of the enzyme. When CTAB was used to help foam cellulase, β-cyclodextrin was subsequently added to the foamate to help restore the enzyme activity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Reference

  1. Johansson, G. and Reczey, K. (1998), J. Chromatogr B 711(1–2), 161–172.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. London, M., Cohen, M., and Hudson, P. B. (1954), Biochim. Biophys. Acta 13, 111–120.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Schnepf, R. W. and Gaden, E. L. (1959), J. Biochem. Microbiol. Technol. Eng. 1(1), 1–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Suzuki, A., Yasuhara, K., Seki, H., and Maruyama, H. (2002), J. Colloid Interface Sci. 253(2), 402–408.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Clarkson, J. R., Cui, Z. F., and Darton, R. C. (1999), J. Colloid Interface Sci. 215(2), 323–332.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Clarkson, J. R., Cui, Z. F., and Darton, R. C. (1999), J. Colloid Interface Sci. 215(2), 333–338.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Chi, E. Y., Krishnan, S., Randolph, T. W., and Carpenter, J. F. (2003), Pharma. Res. 20(9), 1325–1336.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Randolph, T. W., and Jones, L. S. (2002), in Rational Design of Stable Protein Formulations, J. F. Carpenter and M. L. Manning, eds., Kluwer Academic/Plenum, New York, pp. 159–175.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Middelberg, A. R. (2002), Trends Biotechnol. 20(10), 437–443.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Clark, E. D. B. (2001), Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 12(2), 202–207.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Voet, D., Voet, J. G., and Pratt, C. W. (1999), Fundamentals of Biochemistry, John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp. 154–157.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rozema, D. and Gellman, S. H. (1995), J. Am. Chem. Soc. 117(8), 2373–2374.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Machida, S., Ogawa, S., Shi, X. H., Takaha, T., Fujii, K., and Hayashi, K., (2000), FEBS Lett. 486(2), 131–135.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Rozema, D. and Gellman, S. H. (1996), Biochemistry 35(49), 15,760–15,771.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Sundari, C.S., Raman, B., and Balasubramanian, D. (1999), FEBS Lett. 443(2), 215–219.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kuboi, R., Mawatari, T., and Yoshimoto, M. (2000), J. Biosci. Bioeng. 90(1), 14–19.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Dong, X. Y., Shi, J. H., and Sun, Y. (2002), Biotechnol. Prog. 18(3), 663–665.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Daugherty, D. L., Rozema, D., Hanson, P. E., and Gellman, S. H. (1998), J. Biol. Chem. 273(51), 33,961–33,971.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Couthon, F., Clottes, E., and Vial, C. (1996), Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm. 227(3), 854–860.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Nath, D. and Roa, M. (2001), Eur. J. Biochem. 268, 5471–5478.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kim, C. S. and Lee, E. K. (2000), Process Biochem. 36(1–2), 111–117.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Mandels, M., Anderotti, R., and Roche, C. (1976), Biotechnol. Bioeng. Symp. 6, 21–33.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Almin, K. and Eriksson, K. (1968), Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 124(129).

  24. Loha, V., Prokop, A., Du, L. P., and Tanner, R. D. (1999), Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 77–9, 701–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Brown, A.K., Kaul, A., and Varley, J. (1999), Biotechnol. Bioeng. 62(3), 278–290.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert D. Tanner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Burapatana, V., Prokop, A. & Tanner, R.D. Enhancing cellulase foam fractionation with addition of surfactant. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 122, 541–552 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1385/ABAB:122:1-3:0541

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1385/ABAB:122:1-3:0541

Index Entries

Navigation