Advertisement

Neurocritical Care

, Volume 5, Issue 1, pp 4–9 | Cite as

Effect of a liberal versus restrictive transfusion strategy on mortality in patients with moderate to severe head injury

  • Lauralyn A. McIntyre
  • Dean A. Fergusson
  • James S. Hutchison
  • Giuseppe Pagliarello
  • John C. Marshall
  • Elizabeth Yetisir
  • Gregory M. T. Hare
  • Paul C. Hébert
  • Canadian Critical Care Trials Group
Original Article

Abstract

Objective

To compare a restrictive versus a liberal transfusion strategy in patients with moderate to severe closed head injury following multiple trauma in 13 Canadian intensive care units (ICUs).

Methods

This is a subgroup analysis of a multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial involving sixty-seven critically ill patients from the Transfusion Requirements in the Critical Care trial who sustained a closed head injury. Patients had a hemoglobin concentration less than 9.0 g/dL within 72 hours of admission to the ICU. Patients were randomized to a restrictive allogeneic red blood cell transfusion strategy (hemoglobin 7.0 g/dL and maintained between 7.0 and 9.0 g/dL) or a liberal strategy (hemoglobin 10.0 g/dL and maintained between 10.0 and 12.0 g/dL).

Results

Baseline characteristics in the restrictive (n=29) and the liberal (n=38) transfusion groups were comparable. Average hemoglobin concentrations and red blood cell units transfused per patient were significantly lower in the restrictive compared to the liberal group. The 30-day all-cause mortality rates in the restrictive group were 17% as compared to 13% in the liberal group (risk difference 4.1 with 95% confidence interval [CI], 13.4 to 21.5, p=0.64). Presence of multiple organ dysfunction (12.1±6.4 versus 10.6±6.3, p=0.35) and changes in multiple organ dysfunction from baseline scores adjusted for death (4.5±6.2 versus 3.4±6.2, p=0.49) were similar between the restrictive and liberal transfusion groups, respectively. Median length of stay in ICU (10 days, interquartile range 5 to 21 days versus 8 days, interquartile range 5 to 11 days, p=0.26) and hospital (27 days, interquartile range 14 to 39 days versus 30.5 days, interquartile range 17 to 47 days, p=0.72) were similar between the restrictive and liberal transfusion groups.

Conclusions

We were unable to detect significant improvements in mortality with a liberal as compared to restrictive transfusion strategy in critically ill trauma victims with moderate to severe head injury.

Key Words

Critical care brain injuries wounds and injuries erythrocyte transfusion randomized controlled trial 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma. Advanced Trauma Life Support for Doctors, 6th ed. Chicago, 1997.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chesnut RM. Secondary brain insults after head injury: clinical perspectives. New Horizons 1995;3(3):366–375.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jones PA, Andrews PJ, Midgley S, et al. Measuring the burden of secondary insults in head-injured patients during intensive care. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 1994;6:4–14.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chesnut RM, Marshall LF, Klauber MR, et al. The role of secondary brain injury in determining outcome from severe head injury. J Trauma 1993;34:216–222.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chesnut RM, Gautille T, Blunt BA, Klauber MR, Marshall LF. Neurogenic hypotension in patients with severe head injuries. J Trauma 1998;44:958–963.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Winchell RJ, Simons RK, Hoyt DB. Transient systolic hypotension. A serious problem in the management of head injury. Arch Surg 1996;131:533–539.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chesnut RM, Marshall SB, Piek J, Blunt BA, Klauber MR, Marshall LF. Early and late systemic hypotension as a frequent and fundamental source of cerebral ischemia following severe brain injury in the Traumatic Coma Data Bank. Acta Neurochir Suppl 1993;59:121–125.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wald SL, Shackford SR, Fenwick J. The effect of secondary insults on mortality and long-term disability after severe head injury in a rural region without a trauma system. J Trauma 1993;34:377–381.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pigula FA, Wald SL, Shackford SR, Vane DW. The effect of hypotension and hypoxia on children with severe head injuries. J Pediatr Surg 1993;28:310–314.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Marmarou A, Anderson RL, Ward JD, et al. Impact of ICP instability and hypotension on outcome in patients with severe head trauma. J Neurosurg 1991;75:S59-S66.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Miller JD, Butterworth JF, Gudeman SK, et al. Further experience in the management of severe head injury. J Neurosurg 1981;54: 289–299.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Price DJ, Murray A. The influence of hypoxia and hypotension on recovery from head injury. Injury 1972;3:218–224.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Stocchetti N, Furlan A, Volta F. Hypoxemia and arterial hypotension at the accident scene in head injury. J Trauma 1996;40:764–767.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kokoska ER, Smith GS, Pittman T, Weber TR. Early hypotension worsens neurological outcome in pediatric patients with moderately severe head trauma. J Pediatr Surg 1998;33:333–338.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fearnside MR, Cook RJ, McDougall P, McNeil RJ. The Westmead Head injury Project outcome in severe head injury. A comparative analysis of pre-hospital, clinical and CT variables. Br J Neurosurg 1993;7:267–279.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hare GMT, Mazer CD, Rassouli AP, et al. Hemodilutional aneumia accentuates cerebral hypoxia following traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma 2003;20:1134.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gibson JB, Maxwell RA, Schweitzer JB, Fabian TC, Proctor KG. Resuscitation from severe hemorrhagic shock after traumatic brain injury using saline, shed blood, or a blood substitute. Shock 2002;17:234–244.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Blajchman MA. Transfusion-associated immunomodulation and universal white cell reduction: are we putting the cart before the horse? Transfusion 1999;39:665–670.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tinmouth A, Chin-Yee I. The clinical consequences of the red cell storage lesion. Transfus Med Rey 2001;15:91–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Moore FA, Moore EE, Sauaia A. Blood transfusion—an independent risk factor for postinjury multiple organ failure. Arch Surg 1997;132:620–625.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hebert PC, Wells G, Blajchman MA, et al. A multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial of transfusion requirements in critical care. Transfusion Requirements in Critical Care Investigators. Canadian Critical Care Trials Group [comment][erratum appears in N Engl J Med 1999 Apr 1;340(13):1056]. N Engl J Med 1999;340:409–417.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    McIntyre L, Hebert PC, Wells G, et al. Is a restrictive transfusion strategy safe for resuscitated and critically ill trauma patients? J Trauma 2004;57:563–568.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Audet A-M, Goodenough LT. Practice strategies for electrive red blood cell transfusion. American College of Physicians [comment]. Ann Intern Med 1992;116:403–406.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Romano PS, Roos LL, Jollis JG. Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative data: differing perspectives. J Clin Epidemiol 1993;46:1075–1079.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Baker SP, O'Neill B, Haddon W jr, Long WB. The injury severity score: a method for describing patients with multiple injuries and evaluating emergency care. J Trauma 1974;14: 187–196.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Marshall JC, Cook DJ, Christou NV, Bernard GR, Sprung CL, Sibbard WJ. Multiple organ dysfunction score: a reliable descriptor of a complex clinical outcome. Crit Care Med 1995;23: 1638–1652.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hebert PC, Yetisir E, Martin C, et al. Is a low transfusion threshold safe in critically ill patients with cardiovascular diseases? [comment]. Crit Care Med 2001;29:227–234.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Wu WC, Rathore SS, Wang Y, Radford MJ, Krumholz HM. Blood transfusion in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction. [comment]. N Engl J Med 2001;345:1230–1236.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Carson JL, Hill S, Carless P, Hebert PC, Henry D. Transfusion triggers: a systematic review of the literature [Review] [61 refs]. Transfus Med Red 2002;16:187–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Fortune JB, Feustel PJ, Saifi J, Stratton HH, Newell JC, Shah DM. Influence of hematocrit on cardiopulmonary function after acute hemorrhage. J Trauma 1987;27:243–249.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Topley E, Fisher MR. The illness of trauma. Br J Clin Pract 1956; 10:770–776.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Smith MJ, Stiefel MF, Magge S, et al. Packed red blood cell transfusion increases local cerebral oxygenation. Crit Care Med 2005;33:1104–1108.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    DeWitt DS, Prough DS, Taylor CL, Whitley JM, Deal DD, Vines SM. Regional cerebrovascular responses to progressive hypotension after traumatic brain injury in cats. Am J Physiol 1992; 263:H1276-H1284.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Glass TF, Fabian MJ, Schweitzer JB, Weinberg JA, Proctor KG. Secondary neurologic injury resulting from nonhypotensive hemorrhage combined with mild traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma 1999;16:771–782.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Oxman AD, Guyatt GH. A consumer's guide to subgroup analyses [see comments.]. Ann Intern Med 1992;116:78–84.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Humana Press Inc 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lauralyn A. McIntyre
    • 1
  • Dean A. Fergusson
    • 1
  • James S. Hutchison
    • 2
  • Giuseppe Pagliarello
    • 3
  • John C. Marshall
    • 4
  • Elizabeth Yetisir
    • 5
  • Gregory M. T. Hare
    • 6
  • Paul C. Hébert
    • 1
  • Canadian Critical Care Trials Group
  1. 1.Centre for Transfusion Research and Clinical Epidemiology ProgramOttawa Health Research InstituteOttawa
  2. 2.Departments of Critical Care and Pediatrics, Hospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of TorontoOttawaCanada
  3. 3.Critical Care ProgramThe Ottawa HospitalOttawaCanada
  4. 4.Department of Surgery, Critical Care ProgramUniversity of TorontoOttawaCanada
  5. 5.University of Ottawa Heart InsituteOttawaCanada
  6. 6.Department of Anesthesia and PhysiologyUniversity of Toronto, St. Michael's HospitalTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations