Neurocritical Care

, Volume 1, Issue 1, pp 107–117

Ethical aspects of determining and communicating prognosis in critical care

Ethical Matters

Abstract

Physicians have an ethical duty to accurately determine and clearly communicate a patient’s prognosis because a patient’s or surrogate’s decision whether to consent for aggressive treatment rests largely on their understanding of the patient’s diagnosis and prognosis. Pitfalls in determining prognosis include uniformed summary judgement based on faulty pattern recognition, inadequate outcome data, utter reliance on retrospective studies, statistical limitations, nongeneralizability of outcome data, and the fallacy of the self-fulfilling prophecy. Pitfalls in physicians’ communication of prognosis include inadequate time spent in discussion, use of technical jargon, biased framing of decisions, unjustified physician bias, patient innumeracy, ethnicity barriers, and surrogates’ unfounded intuitions about critical illness and death. Improving the recognition of and surmounting the barriers to accurate determination and clear communication of prognosis can make critical care physicians more scientific and virtuous.

Key Words

Prognosis patient-physician relationship communication informed consent surrogate decision-making 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Gilchrist JM, ed. Prognosis in Neurology. Boston, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann, 1998.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Evans RW, Baskin DS, Yatsu FM, eds. Prognosis of Neurological Disorders, 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bernat JL. Areas of consensus in withdrawing life-sustaining treatment in the neurointensive care unit. Neurology 1999;52:1538–1539.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Meisel A, Kuczewski M. Legal and ethical myths about informed consent. Arch Intern Med 1996;156:2521–2526.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gert B, Nelson WA, Culver CM. Moral theory and neurology. Neurol Clin 1989;7:681–696.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brock DW. The ideal of shared decision-making between physicians and patients. Kennedy Inst Ethics J 1991;1:28–47.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rich BA. Defining and delineating a duty to prognosticate. Theor Med Bioethics 2001;22:177–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Annas GJ. Informed consent, cancer, and truth in prognosis. N Engl J Med 1994;330:223–225.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schneiderman LJ, Arras JD. Counseling patients to counsel physicians on future care in the event of patient incompetence. Ann Intern Med 1985;102:693–698.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Menikoff JA, Sachs GA, Siegler M. Beyond advancedirectives{/}health care surrogate laws. N Engl J Med 1992;327:1165–1169.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bernat JL. Ethical Issues in Neurology, 2nd ed. Boston, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann, 2002:85–96.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bernat JL. Plan ahead: how neurologists can enhance patient-centered medicine. Neurology 2001;56:144–145.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Knaus WA, Wagner DP, Drape. The APACHE III prognostic system: risk prediction of hospital mortality for critically ill hospitalized patients. Chest 1991;100:1619–1636.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Knaus WA, Harrell FE Jr, Lynn J, et al. The SUPPORT model: objective estimates of survival for seriously ill hospitalized adults. Ann Intern Med 1995;122:191–203.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Levy DE, Caronna JJ, Singer BH, et al. Predicting outcome from hypoxic-ischemic coma. JAMA 1985;253:1420–1426.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Justice AC, Covinsky KE, Berlin JA. Assessing the generalizability of prognostic information. Ann Intern Med 1999;130:515–524.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Braitman LE, Davidoff F. Predicting clinical states in individual patients. Ann Intern Med 1996;125:406–412.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Shewmon DA, De Giorgio CM. Early prognosis in anoxic coma. Neurol Clin 1989;7:823–843.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mayer SA, Kossoff SB. Withdrawal of life support in the neurological intensive care unit. Neurology 1999;52:1602–1609.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Becker KJ, Baxter AB, Cohen WA, et al. Withdrawal of support in intracerebral hemorrhage may lead to self-fulfilling prophecies. Neurology 2001;56:766–772.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Broderick JP, Brott TG, Duldner JE, et al. Volume of intracerebral hemorrhage. A powerful and easy-to-use predictor of 30-day mortality. Stroke 1993;24:987–993.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tuhrim S, Dambrosia JM, Price TR, et al. Prediction of intracerebral hemorrhage survival. Ann Neurol 1988;24:258–263.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tuhrim S, Horowitz DR, Sacher M, et al. Validation and comparison of models predicting survival after intracerebral hemorrhage. Crit Care Med 1995;23:950–954.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Tuhrim S, Horowitz DR, Sacher M, et al. Volume of intraventricular blood is an important determinant of outcome in supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage. Crit Care Med 1999;27:617–621.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Fogelholm R, Avikainen S, Murros K. Prognostic value and determinants of first-day mean arterial pressures in spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke 1997;28:1396–1400.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Broderick JP, Adams HP Jr, Barsan W, et al. Guidelines for the management of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: a statement for healthcare professionals from a special writing group of the Stroke Council, American Heart Association. Stroke 1999;30:905–915.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Multi-Society Task Force on PVS. Medical aspects of the persistent vegetative state. Parts I. N Engl J Med 1994;330:1499–1508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Multi-Society Task Force on PVS. Medical aspects of the persistent vegetative state. Parts II. N Engl J Med 1994;330:1572–1579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Volicer L, Berman SA, Cipolloni PB, Mandell A. Persistent vegetative state in Alzheimer disease: does it exist? Arch Neurol 1997;54:1382–1384.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Murray LS, Teasdale GM, Murray GD, et al. Does prediction of outcome alter patient management? Lancet 1993;341:1487–1491.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Christakis NA. Prognostication and bioethics. Daedalus 1999;128:197–214.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Katz J. Why doctors don’t disclose uncertainty. Hastings Cent Rep 1984;14:35–44.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Christakis NA. Death Foretold: Prophecy and Prognosis in Medical Care. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1999.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Quill TE. Recognizing and adjusting to barriers in doctor-patient communication. Ann Intern Med 1989;111:51–57.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Quill TE. Initiating end-of-life discussions with seriously ill patients: addressing the “elephant in the room”. JAMA 2000;284:2502–2507.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Ptacek JT, Eberhardt TL. Breaking bad news: a review of the literature. JAMA 1996;276:496–502.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Buckman R. How to Break Bad News: A Guide for Health Care Professionals. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Quill TE, Arnold RM, Platt F. “I wish things were different”: expressing wishes in response to loss, futility, and unrealistic hope. Ann Intern Med 2001;135:551–555.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Christakis NA, Iwashnya TJ. Attitude and selfreported practice regarding prognostication in a national sample of internists. Arch Intern Med 1998;158:2389–2395.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    SUPPORT Principal Investigators. A controlled trial to improve care for seriously ill hospitalized patients. The Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatment (SUPPORT). JAMA 1995;274:1591–1598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Hoffman JC, Wenger NS, Davis RB, et al. Patient preferences for communication with physicians about end-of-life decisions. Ann Intern Med 1997;127:1–12.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Mazur DJ, Hickam DH. Patients’ interpretations of probability terms. J Gen Intern Med 1991;6:237–240.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Tversky A, Kahneman D. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 1981;211:453–458.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Malenka DJ, Baron JA, Johansen S, et al. The framing effect of relative and absolute risk. J Gen Intern Med 1993;8:543–548.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Murphy DJ, Burrows D, Santilli S, et al. The influence of the probability of survival on patients’ preferences regarding cardiopulmonary resuscitation. N Engl J Med 1994;330:545–549.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Bogardus ST Jr, Holmboe E, Jekel JF. Perils, pitfalls, and possibilities in talking about medical risk. JAMA 1999;281:1037–1041.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Solomon NA, Glick HA, Russo CJ, et al. Patient preferences for stroke outcomes. Stroke 1994;25:1721–1725.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Jecker NS, Carrese JA, Pearlman RA. Caring for patients in cross-cultural settings. Hastings Cent Rep 1995;25:6–14.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Crawley LM, Marshall PA, Lo B, Koenig BA. Strategies for culturally effective end-of-life care. Ann Intern Med 2002;136:673–679.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Blackhall LJ, Murphy ST, Frank G, Michel V, Azen A. Ethnicity and attitudes toward patient autonomy. JAMA 1995;274:820–825.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Kagawa-Singer M, Blackhall LJ. Negotiating cross-cultural issues at the end of life: “you got to go where helives.” JAMA 2001;286:2993–3001.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Freedman B. Offering truth: one ethical approach to the uninformed cancer patient. Arch Intern Med 1993;153:572–576.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Youngner SJ, Landefeld S, Coulton CJ, et al. “Brain death” and organ retrieval: a cross-sectional survey of knowledge and concepts among health professionals. JAMA 1989;261:2205–2210.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Frank JI. Perceptions of death and brain death among fourth-year medical students: defining our challenge as neurologists [abstract]. Neurology 2001;56(Suppl 3):A429.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Molinari GF. Brain death, irreversible coma, and words doctors use. Neurology 1982;32:400–402.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Miedema F. Medical treatment after brain death: a case report and ethical analysis. J Clin Ethics 1991;2:50–52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Cranford RE. Discontinuation of ventilation after brain death: policy should be balanced with concern for the family. Br Med J 1999;318:1754–1755.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Humana Press Inc. 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dartmouth Medical SchoolHanover
  2. 2.Neurology SectionDartmouth-Hitchcock Medical CenterLebanon

Personalised recommendations