Endocrine

, Volume 23, Issue 2–3, pp 87–91 | Cite as

Epidemiology of erectile dysfunction

Article

Abstract

Following the landmark Massachusetts Male Aging Study (MMAS) that provided the first relatively unbiased study of the epidemiology of erectile dysfunction (ED), a number of additional studies were carried out in the U.S. and around the world. The studies vary in quality because they used different definitions of ED, different assessment instruments, different and sometimes biased sources of populations, inadequate response rates to questionnaires and interviews, cultural disparities in willingness to discuss sexual issues, and differing interpretations of the results. Nevertheless, the studies demonstrated similar levels of ED by age and an exponential rise with age. They also generally confirmed the conditions that correlated with ED in the MMAS, namely, diabetes, hypertension, coronary artery disease, prostate cancer therapy, and depression. These were exacerbated by cigaret smoking.

Key Words

Erectile dysfunction epidemiology aging diabetes atherosclerosis depression hypertension prostate cancer 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Feldman, H., Goldstein, I., Hatzichristou, D. G., Krane, R. J., and McKinlay, J. B. (1994). J. Urol. 151, 54–61.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    NIH Consensus Development Panel Conference. (1993). JAMA.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Consensus development conference statement: National Institutes of Health: Impotence. (1993). Int. J. Impot. Res. 5, 181–189.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rosen, R. C., Riley, A., Wagner, G., Osterloh, I. H., Kirkpatrick, J., and Mishra, A. (1997). Urology 49(6), 822–830.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Johannes, C. B., et al. (2000). J. Urol. 163(2), 460–463.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Araujo, A. B., et al. (2000). Am. J. Epidemiol. 152(6), 533–541.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Aytac, I., Mc Kinlay, J. B., and Krane, R. J. (1999). BJU Int. 84, 50–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Blanker, M. H., et al. (2001). Urology 57(4), 763–768.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Koskimaki, J., et al. (2000). J. Urol. 164(2), 367–370.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Martin-Morales, A., et al. (2001). J. Urol. 166(2), 569–574; discussion 574, 575.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rhoden, E. L., et al. (2002). J. Urol. 167(4), 1745–1748.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Laumann, E. O., Paik, A., and Rosen, R. C. (1999). JAMA 281(6), 537–544.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ansong, K. S., et al. (2000). Ann. Epidemiol. 10(5), 293–296.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Moreira, E. D., et al. (2001). Urology 58(4), 583–588.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Braun, M., et al. (2000). Int. J. Impot. Res. 12(6), 305–311.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Marumo, K., Nakashima, J., and Murai, M. (2001). Int. J. Urol. 8(2), 53–59.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Green, J. S., et al. (2001). BJU Int. 88(6), 551–553.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pinnock, C. B., Stapleton, A. M., and Marshall, V. R. (1999). Med. J. Aust. 171(7), 353–357.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Parazzini, F., et al. (2000). Eur. Urol. 37(1), 43–49.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ventegodt, S. (1998). Arch. Sex. Behav. 27(3), 295–307.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Slag, M. F., Morley, J. E., Elson, M. K., et al. (1983). JAMA 249(13), 1736–1740.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Davis, S. S., Viosca, S. P., Guralnik, M., et al. (1985). West. J. Med. 142(4), 499–505.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kaiser, F., et al. (1988). J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 36(6), 511–519.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kaiser, F. E. and Korenman, S. G. (1988). Am. J. Med. 85(5A), 147–152.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Persson, C., Diederichs, W., Lue, T. F., et al. (1989). J. Urol. 142(6), 1462–1468.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Rajfer, J., Aronson, W. J., Bush, P. A., Dorey, F. J., and Ignarro, L. J. (1992). N. Engl. J. Med. 326(2), 90–94.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Fedele, D., et al. (2001). J. Urol. 166(4), 1368–1371.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Siu, S. C., L.s., Wong, K. W., Ip, K. M., and Wong, Y. S. (2001). Diabetes Med. 18, 732–738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Romeo, J. H., et al. (2000). J. Urol. 163(3), 788–791.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Siegel, T., et al. (2001). J. Urol. 165(2), 430–435.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Stock, R. G., Kao, J., and Stone, N. N. (2001). J. Urol. 165(2), 436–439.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Mehik, A., et al. (2001). BJU Int. 88(1), 35–38.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Walsh, P. C., Eggleston, L. H., and Eggleston J. C. (1983). Prostate 4, 473–485.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Litwin, M. S., et al. (1999). Urology 54(3), 503–508.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Schover, L. R., et al. (2002). Cancer 95(8), 1773–1785.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Rosas, S. E., et al. (2001). Kidney Int. 59(6), 2259–2266.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Malavaud, B., et al. (2000). Transplantation 69(10), 2121–2124.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Abdel-Hamid, I. A., et al. (2002). Int. J. Impot. Res. 14(1), 32–37.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Seidman, S. N. (2002). J. Clin. Psychiatry 63(Suppl. 5), 5–12; discussion 23–25.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Seidman, S. N., et al. (2001). Am. J. Psychiatry 158(10), 1623–1630.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Zorzon, M., et al. (1999). Multiple Sclerosis (Houndmills Basingstoke, England) 5(6), 418–427.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Kim, H. S., et al. (2000). Spine 25(17), 2187–2190.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Lallemand, F., et al. (2002). J. Acquir. Immune Defic. Syndr. 30(2), 187–190.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    McVary, K. T., et al. (2001). J. Urol. 166(5), 1624–1632.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Humana Press Inc. 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of MedicineDavid Geffen School of Medicine at UCLALos Angeles

Personalised recommendations