Utilization of xylitol dehydrogenase in a combined microbial/enzymatic process for production of xylitol from d-glucose
- 133 Downloads
The production of xylitol from d-glucose occurs through a three-step process in which d-arabitol and d-xylulose are formed as the first and second intermediate product, respectively, and both are obtained via microbial bioconversion reactions. Catalytic hydrogenation of d-xylulose yields xylitol; however, it is contaminated with d-arabitol. The aim of this study was to increase the stereoselectivity of the d-xylulose reduction step by using enzymatic catalysis. Recombinant xylitol dehydrogenase from the yeast Galactocandida mastotermitis was employed to catalyze xylitol formation from d-xylulose in an NADH-dependent reaction, and coenzyme regeneration was achieved by means of formate dehydrogenase-catalyzed oxidation of formate into carbon dioxide. The xylitol yield from d-xylulose was close to 100%. Optimal productivity was found for initial coenzyme concentrations of between 0.5 and 0.75 mM. In the presence of 0.30 M (45 g/L) d-xylulose and 2000 U/L of both dehydrogenases, exhaustive substrate turnover was achieved typically in a 4-h reaction time. The enzymes were recovered after the reaction in yields of approx 90% by means of ultrafiltration and could be reused for up to six cycles of d-xylulose reduction. The advantages of incorporating the enzyme-catalyzed step in a process for producing xylitol from d-glucose are discussed, and strategies for downstream processing are proposed by which the observed coenzyme turnover number of approx 600 could be increased significantly.
Index EntriesXylitol coenzyme regeneration optimization biocatalysis
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 6.Onishi, H. and Suzuki, T. (1969), Appl. Microbiol. 18, 1031–1035.Google Scholar
- 7.Leleu, J. -B., Duflot, P., and Caboche, J. -J. (1993), US patent no. US005096820.Google Scholar
- 8.Wong, B., Murray, J. S., Castellanos, M., and Croen, K. D. (1993), J. Bacteriol. 175, 6314–6320.Google Scholar
- 9.Suzuki, S., Sugiyama, M., Mori, M., Mihara, Y., and Yokozeki, K. (2000), European patent no. EP1026255A1.Google Scholar
- 10.Sugiyama, M., Suzuki, S., Mihara, Y., Hashiguchi, K., and Yokozeki, K. (2000), European patent no. EP1026254A1.Google Scholar
- 11.Lunzer, R., Mamnun, Y., Haltrich, D., Kulbe, K. D., and Nidetzky, B. (1998), Biochem. J. 336, 91–99.Google Scholar
- 12.Lunzer, R., Ortner, I., Haltrich, D., Kulbe, K. D., and Nidetzky, B. (1998), Biocat. Biotrans. 16, 333–349.Google Scholar
- 17.Kragl, U., Vasic-Racki, D., and Wandrey, C. (1996), Bioprocess Eng. 14, 291–297.Google Scholar
- 19.Mohr, T., Schwarz, E., and Mackert, P.-J. (2001), World patent no. W01/00550A1.Google Scholar