Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology

, Volume 90, Issue 3, pp 211–220 | Cite as

Purification of α-amylases using magnetic alginate beads

Article

Abstract

Magnetic alginate beads were used to purify α-amylases from porcine pancreas, starchzyme, BAN 240L (a commercial purification from Bacillus subtilis), and wheat germ. The beads bound a significant level of α-amylase activity from porcine pancreas, BAN 240L, and wheat germ. In each case, the enzyme activity could be eluted by using 1.0 M maltose, a known competitive inhibitor of α-amylase. In the case of BAN 240L, 3.6-fold purification with 72% recovery of activity was observed. In the case of wheat germ enzyme, starting from the crude extract, 48-fold purification with 70% activity recovery was observed. Sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis analysis also indicated considerable purification in the latter case.

Index Entries

Affinity separation α-amylase magnetic alginate beads macroaffinity ligands wheat amylase 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Safarik, I. and Safarikova, M. (1999), J. Chromatogr. 722, 33–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Safarik, I. and Safarikova, M. (1997), in Scientific and Clinical Applications of Magnetic Carriers, Hafeli, U., Schut, W., Teller, J., and Dorowski, M., eds., Plenum, New York, pp. 323–340.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tyagi, R. and Gupta, M. N. (1995), Biocatal. Biotrans. 12, 293–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Worlock, A. J., Sidgwick, A., Horsburgh, T., and Bell, P. R. L. (1991), Biotechniques 10, 310–315.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Karlsson, G. B. and Platt, F. M. (1991), Anal. Biochem. 199, 219–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sardar, M. and Gupta, M. N. (1998), Bioseparation 7, 159–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Walsh, G. and Headon, D. (1994) in Protein Biotechnology, Wiley, Chichester, pp. 321–322.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Smidsrod, O. and Skjak-Braek, G. (1990), Trends Biotechnol. 8, 71–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Decker, L. A. (1977), Worthington Enzyme Manual, Worthington Biochemical, Freehold, NJ.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bradford, M. M. (1976), Anal. Biochem. 72, 248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hames, B. D. (1986), in Gel Electrophoresis of Protein: A Practical Approach, Hames B. D. and Rickwood, D., eds., IRL, Oxford, pp. 1–86.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rozie, H., Somers, W., Bonte, A., Visser, J., van’t Riet, J., and Rombouts, F. (1988), Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem. 10, 346–358.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Burns, M. A., Kvesitadze, G. I., and Graves, D. J. (1985), Biotechnol. Bioeng. 27, 137–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rozie, H., Somers, W., Bonte, A., Visser, J., Van’t Riet, K., and Rombouts, F. (1991), Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem. 13, 181–195.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sharma, A., Sharma, S., and Gupta, M. N. (2000), Protein Exp. Purif. 18, 111–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Roy, I., Sardar, M., and Gupta, M. N. (2000), Enzyme Microb. Technol. 27, 53–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Humana Press Inc. 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Chemistry DepartmentIndian Institute of Technology, Delhi, Hauz KhasNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations