Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology

, Volume 106, Issue 1–3, pp 337–352 | Cite as

A comprehensive kinetic model for dilute-acid hydrolysis of cellulose



Acid-catalyzed hydrolysis is controlled not only by temperature and acid concentration but also by the physical state of the cellulose. Under low temperature and acid condition the cellulose structure stays in stable crystalline form. Therefore, the prevailing reaction mode is endwise hydrolysis. Glucose then becomes the main sugar product. However, when temperature and/or acid concentration is raised to a certain level, the cellulose structure becomes unstable by breakage of hydrogen bonding, the primary force that holds the cellulose chains. Once the crystalline structure of the cellulose is disrupted, acid molecules can penetrate into the inner layers of the cellulose chains. In support of this hypothesis, we have experimentally verified that a substantial amount of oligomers is formed as reaction intermediates under extremely low-acid and high-temperature conditions. We also found that the breakage of hydrogen bonds occurs rather abruptly in response to temperature. One such condition is 210°C, 0.07% H2SO4. Glucose, once it is formed in the hydrolysate, interacts with acid-soluble lignin, forming a lignin-carbohydrate complex. This occurs concurrently with other reactions involving glucose such as decomposition and reversion. On the basis of these findings, a comprehensive kinetic model is proposed. This model is in full compliance with our recent experimental data obtained under a broad range of reaction conditions.

Index Entries

Acid hydrolysis cellulose kinetics model hydrogen bond oligomer lignin 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Saeman, J. F. (1945), Ind. Eng. Chem. 37, 43–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Springer, E. L. (1966), Tappi 49, 102–106.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Daruwalla, E. H. and Shet, R. T. (1962), Text. Res. J. 32, 942–954.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nelson, M. L. (1960), J. Polym. Sci. 43, 351–371.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Philipp, B., Jacopian, V., Loth, F., Hirte, W., and Schulz, G. (1979), in Hydrolysis of Cellulose: Mechanisms of Enzymatic and Acid Catalysis, Advances in Chemistry Series, vol. 181, Brown, R. D., Jr. and Jurasek, L., eds., American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, pp. 127–143.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Millett, M. A., Effland, M. J., and Caulfield, D. F. (1979), in Hydrolysis of Cellulose: Mechanisms of Enzymatic and Acid Catalysis, Advances in Chemistry Series, vol. 181, Brown, R. D., Jr. and Jurasek, L., eds., American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, pp. 71–89.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Conner, A. H., Wood, B. F., Hill, C. G., and Harris, J. F. (1986), in Cellulose: Structure, Modification and Hydrolysis, Young, R. A. and Rowell, R. M., eds., J. Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, pp. 281–296.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bouchard, J., Abatzoglou, N., Chornet, E., and Overend, R. P. (1989), Wood Sci. Technol. 23, 343–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mok, W. S., Antal, M. J., and Varhegyi, G. (1992), I & EC 31, 94–100.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kim, S. B. and Lee, Y. Y. (1987), Biotech. Bioeng. Symp. 17, 71–84.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Abatzoglou, N., Bouchard, J., Chornet, E., and Overend, R. P. (1986), Can. J. Chem. Eng. 64, 781–786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Torget, R. W., Kim, J. S., and Lee, Y. Y. (2000), Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 39, 2817–2825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ehrman, T., Ruiz, R., and Templeton, D. (1995), NREL Chemical Analysis & Testing Standard Procedure, LAP No. 002-05, No. 10, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Boulder, CO.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Torget, R. W., Nagel, N., Jennings, E., Ibsen K., and Elander, R. (1999), presented at 21st Symposium on Biotechnology for Fuels and Chemicals, Fort Collins, CO.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Xiang, Q., Pettersson, P., Torget, R. W., and Lee, Y. Y. (2002), presented at 24th Symposium on Biotechnology for Fuels and Chemicals, Gatlinburg, TN.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lazareva, T. G. and Vashuk, V. (1996), Int. J. Mod. Phys. 10(23/24), 2983.ADSGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Heiner, P. A. and Teleman, O. (1997), Langumir 13(3), 511–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Knodo, T. J. (1997), Polymer Sci. 35, 717–723.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sasaki, M., Kabyemela, B., Adschiri, T., Malahuan, R., Hirose, S., Takeda, N., and Arai, K. (1997), presented at 4th International Symposium on Supercritical Fluids, Sendai, Japan.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sasaki, M., Fang, Z., Fukushima, Y., Adschiri, T., and Arai, K. (2000), Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 39, 2883–2890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Fengel, D. and Wegener, G. (1984), in Wood Chemistry, Ultrastructure, Reactions, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 279–281.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Humana Press Inc. 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Chemical EngineeringAuburn UniversityAuburn
  2. 2.Deptment of Chemical EngineeringKyonggi University, PaldalkuEwuidong, SuwonKorea

Personalised recommendations