Skip to main content
Log in

Methyl Methacrylate–Ethyleneglycol Dimethacrylate–Acrylic Acid Surface as Stationary Phase for Stir Bar Sorptive Extraction

  • Full Short Communication
  • Published:
Chromatographia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 07 October 2010

Abstract

A novel poly(methyl methacrylate–ethyleneglycol dimethacrylate–acrylic acid) film has been introduced for coating on stir bars to sorptive extraction (SBSE). The effects of different contents of porogen, monomer, cross-linker, modifier and initiator during the solvent or bulk polymerization step on the mechanical property and solvent resistant of prepared sorptive stir bars were investigated. The evaluation of results were caused to obtain the four prepared sorptive stir bars with good mechanical stability and excellent resistance to organic solvents. The extraction efficiency of these prepared sorptive stir bars were investigated by liquid desorption-liquid chromatography-ultraviolet detection (LD-LC-UV) using N-Nitrosodiphenylamine as target analyte. SBSE assays showed the sorptive stir bar that prepared using solution polymerization method had the better recovery for N-Nitrosodiphenylamine in water samples. This sorptive stir bar showed good linearity and acceptable recoveries, as well as advantages such as sensitivity, simplicity, low cost and high feasibility. Based on atomic force microscopy (AFM) results, the average pore size of optimum prepared stir bar using solvent polymerization method was obtained ~9 nm. The thermal gravity (TG) and differential scanning calorimetric (DSC) results showed this polyacrylate film has high thermal stability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. Baltussen E, Sandra P, David F, Cramers C (1999) J Microcol Sep 11:737–747

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Queiroz RHC, Bertucci C, Malfar´a WR, Dreossi SAC, Chaves AR, Vale´rio DAR, Queiroz MEC (2008) J Pharm Biomed Anal 48:428–434

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fernandes C, Jiayu P, Sandra P, Lancas FM (2006) Chromatographia 64:517–521

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Morlock G, Kopacz S (2008) J Liq Chromatogr Relat Technol 31:1925–1942

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Guerrero ED, Marin RN, Mejias RC, Barroso CG (2006) J Chromatogr A 1104:47–53

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kawaguchi M, Ishii Y, Sakui N, Okanouchi N, Ito R, Saito K, Nakazawa H (2005) Anal Chim Acta 539:83–89

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Juan D, Cristina D, Dominico AG, Rafael V, Carmelo GB (2005) J Chromatogr A 1025:263–267

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hu Y, Zheng Y, Zhu F, Li G (2007) J Chromatogr A 1148:16–22

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Mothes S, Popp R, Wennrich R (2003) Chromatographia 57:S249–S252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Liu WM, Wang HW, Guan YF (2004) J Chromatogr A 1045:15–22

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lambert JP, Mullett WM, Kwong E, Lubda D (2005) J Chromatogr A 1075:43–49

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Fernandes de Oliveira A, Berto da Silveira C, Denofre de Campos S, Antoˆnio de Campos E, Carasek E (2005) Chromatographia 61:277–283

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Yu C, Li X, Hu B (2008) J Chromatogr A 1202:102–106

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Koch CC (2002) Nanostructured materials-processing, properties and potential applications. Noyes, New york

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jin G, Tang Y (2009) Microchim Acta 165:143–149

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Rywotycki R (2007) Food Chem 101:540–548

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Wilp J, Zwickenplug W, Richter E (2002) Food Chem Toxicol 40:1223–1228

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Rywotycki R (2003) Meat Sci 65:669–676

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Andrade R, Reyes FGR, Rath S (2005) Food Chem 91:173–179

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhao YY, Boyd J, Hrudey S, Fangli A (2006) Environ Sci Technol 40:7636–7641

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Tricker AR, Preussmann R (1991) Mutat Res 259:277–289

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Ventanas S, Ruiz J (2006) Talanta 70:1017–1023

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Grebel JE, Young CC, Suffet IH (2006) J Chromatogr A 1117:11–18

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Oberacher H, Premstaller A, Huber CG (2004) J Chromatogr A 1030:201–208

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Xiao L, Xu G, Chen A, Yuan S (2003) Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 219:233–242

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Zahra Talebpour or Hassan Y. Aboul-Enein.

Additional information

An erratum to this article can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1365/s10337-010-1780-x

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Talebpour, Z., Safari, M., Molaabaci, F. et al. Methyl Methacrylate–Ethyleneglycol Dimethacrylate–Acrylic Acid Surface as Stationary Phase for Stir Bar Sorptive Extraction. Chroma 72, 707–712 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1365/s10337-010-1707-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1365/s10337-010-1707-6

Keywords

Navigation