Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of an HPIC Method for Determination of Nitrates in Vegetables

  • Full Short Communication
  • Published:
Chromatographia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of the work was to verify the reliability of an HPIC method for determination of nitrates in vegetables using statistical analysis to evaluate validation parameters according the ISO/IEC 17025:2005. Standard solutions were used for the construction of a calibration curve, which was supported by Varian Star Workstation software. All calculated validation characteristics were summarized in an Excel table with final evaluation of the method. Repeatability was characterized by the selected variation coefficient sR, calculated from the standard deviation sd and arithmetic mean from a series of measurements under repeat conditions, accuracy by the variation coefficient sR, and recovery. The repeatability of the method of 3.62% is under the set limit of 5%. The calculated uncertainty was 4.22% with a recovery of 99.2%. Determination of nitrate was linear over the whole range of the calibration graph. The LOQ was 0.60 mg L−1, which is fully acceptable within the requirements for nitrate determination in plant materials. Standard uncertainty of these methods was calculated as an expanded uncertainty according to Eurachem documents in the PC program Metro2003, version 2.30.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

References

  1. ISO/IEC 17025:2005 standard (2005) General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories

  2. The fitness for purpose of analytical methods, Eurachem Guide (1998), http://www.eurachem.org/guides/valid.pdf

  3. Huarte-Mendicoa JC, Astiasaran I, Bello J (1997) Food Chem 58:39–42. doi:10.101/S0308-8146(96)00193-8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Čviriková V, Kozárová I, Ivičičová A, Hegedűs O (2002) In: Chemické analýzy pri zabezpečovaní ochrany zdravia obyvateľstva, OCHA ŠZÚ Banská Bystrica, ISBN 80-967858-6-9

  5. Morris MP, González-Más A (1958) J Agric Food Chem 6:456–457. doi:10.1021/jf60088a004

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Beljaars PR, Van Dijk R, Van Der Horst GM (1994) J AOAC Int 77:1522–1529

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lima J, Rangel A, Souto RS (1995) J Agric Food Chem 43:704–707. doi:10.1021/jf00051a027

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Perez-Olmos R, Herrero R, Lima JLFC, MCBSM Montenegro (1997) Food Chem 59:305–311. doi:10.1016/S0308-8146(96)00263-4

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ximenes MIN, Rath S, Reyes FGR (2000) Talanta 51:49–56. doi:10.1016/S0039-9140(99)00248-9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Jimidar M, Hartmann C, Cousement N, Massart DL (1995) J Chromatogr A 706:479–492. doi:10.1016/00214-9673(94)01290-U

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Matejovič I, Bieliková M (1994) Fresenius J Anal Chem 49:1130–1432. doi:10.1007/BF00323994

    Google Scholar 

  12. Karovičová J, Polonský J, Drdák M, Príbela A (2006) Food 34:765–767. doi:10.1002/food.19900340822

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lyons DJ, McCallum LE, Osborne WJ, Nobbs PE (1991) Analyst 116:153–157. doi:10.1039/AN9911600153

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. McMulen SE, Casanova JA, Gross LK, Schenck FJ (2005) J AOAC Int 88(6):1793–1796

    Google Scholar 

  15. De Martin S, Restani P (2003) Food Addit Contam 20:787–792. doi:10.1080/0265203031000152415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Raessler M, Hilke I (2006) Microchim Acta 154:27–29. doi:10.1007/s00604-006-0495-z

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Thabano JRE, Abong’o D, Sawula GM (2004) J Chromatogr A 1045:153–159. doi:10.1016/j.choma.2004.05.028

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Masson P, Gilbert G, Plenet D (1996) J Chromatogr A 752:298–303. doi:10.1016/S0021-9673(96)00487-6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Masson P, de Raemaeker F, Bon F (2005) Accredit Qual Assur 10:439–443. doi:10.1007/s00769-005-0026-3

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Gapper LW, Fong BY, Otter DE, Indyk HE, Woollard DC (2004) Int Dairy J 14:881–887. doi:101016/j.idairyj.2004.02.015

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Neal M, Neal C, Wickham H, Harman S (2007). Hydrol Earth Syst Sci II (I):294–300

  22. Tanner PA, Chan SM (1996) J Chromatogr A 739:249–256. doi:10.1016/0021-9673(96)00233-6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Chen J (1996) J Chromatogr A 739:273–280. doi:10.1016/0021-9673(96)00036-2

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Maruo M, Doi T, Obata H (2006) Anal Sci 22:1175–1178. doi:10.2116/analsci.22.1175

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Muir AD, Soroka JJ (1992) J Agric Food Chem 40:1602–1605. doi:10.1021/jf00021a025

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Novaes HB, Vaitsman DS, Dutra PB (2009) Quim Nova 32:1647–1650. doi:10.1590/S0100-40422009000600049

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Siu DC, Henshall A (1998) J Chromatogr A 804:157–160. doi:10.1016/S0021-9673(97)01245-4

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Szabo Z, Böddi K, Mark L, Szabo LG, Ohmacht R (2006) J Agric Food Chem 54:4082–4086. doi:10.1021/jf0524628

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Hegedűs O, Hegedűsová A, Gašparík J, Ivičičová A (2005) Chemické listy 99:518–524

    Google Scholar 

  30. Mocák J (1998) Laboratórna diagnostika 3:43–48

    Google Scholar 

  31. Baričič P, Mackov M (2003) Metro2003 (Verzia: 2.30). Laboratórny softvér pre Windows. Chemmea s.r.o., Bratislava

  32. Hegedűs O (2002) In: Zborník abstraktov z prednášok a posterov z konferencie OCHA, ŠZÚ Banská Bystrica, pp 14–18. ISBN 80-967858-6-9

  33. ISO 3534-1:2006 standard (2006) Statistics, vocabulary and symbols, part 1: general statistical terms and terms used in probability

  34. Bartolomeo MP, Maisano F (2006) J Biomol Tech 17:131–137

    Google Scholar 

  35. IUPAC/ISO/AOAC international/EURACHEM harmonised guidelines for the use of recovery information in analytical measurement, (1996) technical report http://www.eurachem.org/guides/recovery.pdf

  36. Mikuška P, Večeřa Z (2003) Anal Chim Acta 495:225–232. doi:10.1016/j.aca.2003.08.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Hajós P, Horváth K (2008) J Chromatogr A 1198–1199:101–106. doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2008.05.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Butt SB, Riaz M, Iqbal MZ (2001) Talanta 55:789–797. doi:10.1016/S0039-9140(01)00502-1

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Nović M, Divjak B, Pihlar B, Hudnik V (1996) J Chromatogr A 739:35–42. doi:10.1016/0021-9673(96)00049-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Professor Attila Felinger (Department of Analytical and Environmental chemistry, University of Pécs) for his kind help and advice. This work was supported by APVV (Grant no. SK-HU-0018-08).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ondrej Hegedűs.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hegedűs, O., Hegedűsová, A., Jakabová, S. et al. Evaluation of an HPIC Method for Determination of Nitrates in Vegetables. Chroma 71 (Suppl 1), 93–97 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1365/s10337-010-1595-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1365/s10337-010-1595-9

Keywords

Navigation