Skip to main content
Log in

Investigations on the Influence of Interface-Geometry in CE-ESI-TOF-MS

  • Full Short Communication
  • Published:
Chromatographia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Three different interfaces for the coupling of capillary electrophoresis with electrospray time-of-flight mass spectrometry are compared with respect to major parameters like sensitivity or robustness. The separation and detection of a test mixture of nine fluoroquinolones was employed for evaluation of these interfaces. Besides a commercially available orthogonal sheath-flow interface, an in-lab constructed in-axis sheath-flow interface (tested in two different geometrical alignments) and a simple lab-made sheathless interface were investigated. Crucial parameters like limits of detection achieved as well as ease of operation and robustness were monitored.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. Schmitt-Kopplin P, Frommberger M (2003) Electrophoresis 24:3837–3867

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Klampfl CW (2006) Electrophoresis 27:3–34

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Klampfl CW (2009) Electrophoresis 30:S83–S91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Moini M (2007) Anal Chem 79:4241–4246

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Li FA, Huang JL, Her GR (2008) Electrophoresis 29:4938–4943

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen CJ, Li FA, Her GR (2008) Electrophoresis 29:1997–2003

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hashimoto M, Ishihama Y, Tomita M, Soga T (2007) Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 21:3579–3584

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Chang CH, Chen CJ, Chuang YC, Her GR (2006) Electrophoresis 27:4303–4311

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Himmelsbach M, Buchberger W, Klampfl CW (2006) Electrophoresis 27:1220–1226

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Himmelsbach M, Klampfl CW, Buchberger W (2005) J Sep 28:1735–1741

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Cook HA, Klampfl CW, Buchberger W (2005) Electrophoresis 26:1576–1583

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Maxwell EJ, Chen DDY (2008) Anal Chim Acta 627:25–33

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Huber CG, Hölzl G (2001) In: Deyl Z, Svec F (eds), Capillary Electrochromatography. Elsevier, Amsterdam

  14. Klampfl CW, Ahrer W (2001) Electrophoresis 22:1579–1584

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Klampfl CW, Buchberger W (2001) Electrophoresis 22:2737–2742

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hilder EF, Klampfl CW, Buchberger W, Haddad PR (2002) Electrophoresis 23:414–420

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Haunschmidt M, Buchberger W, Klampfl CW (2008) J Chromatogr A 1213:88–92

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Vo TDT, Himmelsbach M, Haunschmidt M, Buchberger W, Schwarzinger C, Klampfl CW (2008) J Chromatogr A 1213:83–87

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Klampfl CW, Andersen L, Haunschmidt M, Himmelsbach M, Buchberger W (2009) Electrophoresis 30:1743–1746

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Zamfir AD (2007) J Chromatogr A 1159:2–13

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Issaq HJ, Janini GM, Chan KC, Veenstra TD (2004) J Chromatogr A 1053:37–42

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christian W. Klampfl.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reiter, S.M., Buchberger, W. & Klampfl, C.W. Investigations on the Influence of Interface-Geometry in CE-ESI-TOF-MS. Chroma 71, 715–719 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1365/s10337-010-1504-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1365/s10337-010-1504-2

Keywords

Navigation