Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of Two On-Line Analysis Techniques Used for the Screening of Antioxidants in EGb 761

  • Full Short Communication
  • Published:
Chromatographia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In order to perform on-line screening procedures for antioxidants in the Ginkgo biloba extract (EGb761), a comparison was carried out between LC–DAD–DPPH analysis used for the determination of DPPH· bleaching and LC–DAD–CL determination applied for the detection of H2O2 and O −·2 scavenging activities. The results demonstrated that 15 antioxidants in EGb 761 could be identified by LC–DAD–CL, while only 10 antioxidants were detected under LC–DAD–DPPH conditions. Furthermore, it was found that both sensitivity and reproducibility of the LC–DAD–CL method were superior. The results indicated that the combination of the two methods might provide useful information for the prediction of antioxidants in herbal medicines.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. Edenharder R, Grünhage D (2003) Mutat Res 540:1–18

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Naruszewicz M, Łaniewska I, Millo B, Dłużniewski M (2007) Atherosclerosis 194:e179–e184

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ding XP, Qi J, Chang YX, Mu LL, Zhu DN, Yu BY (2009) J Chromatogr A 1216:2204–2210

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Niederländer HAG, van Beek TA, Bartasiute A, Koleva II (2008) J Chromatogr A 1210:121–134

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Shi SY, Zhang YP, Jiang XY, Chen XQ, Huang KL, Zhou HH, Jiang XY (2009) Trends Anal Chem 28:865–877

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Koşar M, Dorman D, Başer K, Hiltunen R (2004) Chromatographia 60:635–638

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Shi SY, Zhou HH, Zhang YP, Huang KL (2008) Chromatographia 68:173–178

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Liu XL, Dong MS, Chen XH, Jiang M, Lv X, Yan GJ (2007) Food Chem 105:548–554

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Şener G, Şener E, Şehirli Ö, Öğünç AV, Çetinel Ş, Gedik N, Sakarcan A (2005) Pharmacol Res 52:216–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gong QH, Wu Q, Huang XN, Sun AS, Shi JS (2005) Life Sci 77:140–148

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhou W, Chai H, Lin PH, Lumsden AB, Yao Q, Chen C (2004) Cardiovasc Drug Rev 22:309–319

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ji YB, Xu QS, Hu YZ, Vander Heyden Y (2005) J Chromatogr A 1066:97–104

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. van Nederkassel AM, Vijverman V, Massart DL, Vander Heyden Y (2005) J Chromatogr A 1085:230–239

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. van Beek TA, Montoro P (2009) J Chromatogr A 1216:2002–2032

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Cui H, He CX, Zhao GW (1999) J Chromatogr A 855:171–179

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Dapkevicius A, van Beek TA, Niederländer HAG (2001) J Chromatogr A 912:73–82

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Rufino MSM, Fernandes FAN, Alves RE, de Brito ES (2009) Food Chem 114:693–695

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 30973965) and Doctoral Foundation of Xiansheng Medicine Enterprise.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bo-Yang Yu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ding, XP., Wang, XT., Xu, T. et al. Comparison of Two On-Line Analysis Techniques Used for the Screening of Antioxidants in EGb 761. Chroma 71, 493–497 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1365/s10337-010-1470-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1365/s10337-010-1470-8

Keywords

Navigation