Skip to main content
Log in

High-Throughput Screening of Drugs of Abuse in Urine by Supported Liquid–Liquid Extraction and UHPLC Coupled to Tandem MS

  • Original
  • Published:
Chromatographia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A qualitative method, involving supported liquid–liquid extraction (SLE) and ultra high pressure liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-MS–MS), was developed for the rapid tentative identification of various drugs of abuse in urine. In this study, 28 drugs and metabolites were covered by the screening procedure. Before analysis, urine samples were extracted by SLE and good extraction recoveries were obtained for most investigated compounds. The UHPLC strategy was then selected for the rapid separation of amphetamines, cocaine, opiates and related compounds in urine. Using columns packed with sub-2 µm particles, analysis time was reduced down to 2 min, while maintaining acceptable performance. Finally, the detection was by tandem MS operating in the single reaction monitoring (SRM) mode. The most intense transition was selected for the different drugs and SRM dwell times set at 5 ms, to maintain sufficient data points across the narrow UHPLC peaks. The tentative identification of the drugs of interest, including amphetamines, opiates and cocaine, was based on both, retention times and mass spectrometry information. With the proposed method, limits of detection were estimated at about 1 ng mL−1 and the applicability was assessed by successfully analyzing several samples of drug abusers. Finally, this study demonstrates the potential of UHPLC coupled to tandem MS for the rapid screening of drugs of abuse in urine.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Stanley SMR, Ching Foo H (2006) J Chromatogr B 836:1–14

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Nordgren HK, Beck O (2004) Ther Drug Monit 26:90–97

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Deventer K, Pozo OJ, Van Eenoo P, Delbeke FT (2007) Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 21:3015–3023

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Fuh MR, Wu TY, Lin TY (2006) Talanta 68:987–991

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Maurer HA (2007) Anal Bioanal Chem 388:1315–1325

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Apollonio LG, Pianca DJ, Whittall IR, Maher WA, Kyd JA (2006) J Chromatogr B 836:111–115

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Guillarme D, Nguyen DTT, Rudaz S, Veuthey JL (2006) J Chromatogr A 1149:20–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Petsalo A, Turpeinen M, Pelkonen O, Tolonen A (2008) J Chromatogr A 1215:107–115

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Churchwell MI, Twaddle NC, Meeker LR, Doerge DR (2005) J Chromatogr B 825:134–143

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Pedraglio S, Rozio MG, Misiano P, Reali V, Dondio G, Bigogno C (2007) J Pharm Biomed Anal 44:665–673

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kaufmann A, Butcher P, Maden K, Widmer M (2007) Anal Chim Acta 586:13–21

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Gervais C, Brosillon S, Laplanche A, Helen C (2008) J Chromatogr A 1202:163–172

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Romero-Gonzalez R, Garrido Frenich A, Martinez Vidal JL (2008) Talanta 76:211–225

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lurie IS, Lio R (2009) J Chromatogr A 1216:1515–1519

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lurie IS, Toske SG (2008) J Chromatogr A 1188:322–326

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Thorngren JO, Ostervall F, Garle M (2008) J Mass Spectrom 43:980–992

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Badoud F, Grata E, Perrenoud L, Avois L, Saugy M, Rudaz S, Veuthey JL (2009) J Chromatogr A 1216:4423–4433

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ventura R, Roig M, Monfort N, Saez P, Berges R, Segura J (2008) Eur J Mass Spectrom 14:191–200

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Berg T, Lundanes E, Christophersen AS, Strand DH (2009) J Chromatogr B 877:421–432

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Moore C, Coulter C, Crompton K (2007) J Chromatogr B 859:208–212

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Johansen SS, Bhatia HM (2007) J Chromatogr B 852:338–344

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Schugerl K (1993) In: Stephanopoulos G (ed) Biotechnology, vol 3, 2nd edn. VCH, Weinheim, pp 557–592

    Google Scholar 

  23. Breitenbucher JG, Arienti KL, McClure KJ (2001) J Comb Chem 3:528–533

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. De Korompay A, Hill JC, Carter JF, NicDaeid N, Sleeman R (2008) J Chromatogr A 1178:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Venn RF, Merson J, Cole S, Macrae P (2005) J Chromatogr B 817:77–80

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Matuszewski BK, Constanzer ML, Chavez-Eng CM (2003) Anal Chem 75:3019–3030

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Marchi I, Rudaz S, Veuthey JL (2009) J Pharm Biomed Anal 49:459–467

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Bonfiglio R, King RC, Olah TV, Merkle K (1999) Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 13:1175–1185

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Lee MR, Yu SC, Hwang BH, Chen CY (2006) Anal Chim Acta 559:25–29

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Schappler J, Nicoli R, Nguyen DTT, Rudaz S, Veuthey JL, Guillarme D (2009) Talanta 78:377–387

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Wyndham KD (2003) Anal Chem 75:6781–6788

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Guillarme D, Nguyen DTT, Rudaz S, Veuthey JL (2008) Eur J Pharm Biopharm 68:430–440

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Matchett MW, Berberich DW, Johnson JE (2001) J Chromatogr A 927:97–102

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Thevis M, Geyer H, Bahr D, Schanzer W (2005) Eur J Mass Spectrom 11:419–427

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Poeaknapo C, Fisinger U, Zenk MH, Schmidt J (2004) Phytochemistry 65:1413–1420

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Etter ML, George S, Graybiel K, Eichhorst J, Lehotay DC (2005) Clin Biochem 38:1095–1100

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Wickens JR, Sleeman R, Keely BJ (2006) Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 20:473–480

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Wang PP, Bartlett MG (1998) J Mass Spectrom 33:961–968

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors whish to thank Dr. Marc Fathi from HUG (Geneva University Hospitals, Switzerland) for providing urine samples from drug abusers and blank urine samples from healthy volunteers.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jean-Luc Veuthey.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Maquille, A., Guillarme, D., Rudaz, S. et al. High-Throughput Screening of Drugs of Abuse in Urine by Supported Liquid–Liquid Extraction and UHPLC Coupled to Tandem MS. Chroma 70, 1373–1380 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1365/s10337-009-1337-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1365/s10337-009-1337-z

Keywords

Navigation