Skip to main content
Log in

Sensitive and Selective LC–ESI–MS Analysis of Aesculin in Rat Plasma

  • Original
  • Published:
Chromatographia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

A rapid and sensitive liquid chromatography–electrospray ionization mass spectrometry method was developed for the determination of aesculin in rat plasma. The analyses were chromatographed on a Zorbax Extend-C18 analytical column (150 × 2.1 mm I.D., 5 µm) with 30:70 (v/v) methanol–0.1% formic acid as mobile phase. Detection was performed by triple-quadrupole tandem mass spectrometry in multi-reaction-monitoring mode with an electrospray ionization source. The method was validated for accuracy and precision, and linearity in the two matrices was good. The assay was linear in the range 12.5–1,800 ng mL−1. The lower limit of quantification of aesculin (LLOQ) was 12.5 ng mL−1. The recovery of aesculin and tinidazole (IS) were well above 85%. The within- and between-batch accuracy was 100–104% and 97–109%, respectively. There were no stability-related problems in the procedure for the analysis of aesculin. The method was successfully used in a preclinical study of the pharmacokinetics of aesculin in rats.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zhang HY, Li QF, Shi ZH, Hu ZD (2000) Talanta 52(4):607–621. doi:10.1016/S0039-9140(00)00343-X

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Wang CJ, Hsieh YJ, Chu CY, Lin YL, Tseng TH (2002) Cancer Lett 183(2):163–168

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Duncan SH, Flint HJ, Stewart CS (1998) FEMS Microbiol Lett 164(2):283–288

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Shi ZH (2007) J Pharm Biomed Anal 44(4):867–873. doi:10.1016/j.jpba.2007.03.035

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhang L, Tong P, Chen GN (2005) J Chromatogr A 1098(1–2):194–198. doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2005.10.029

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. You TY, Yang XR, Wang EK (1999) Anal Chim Acta 401(1–2):29–34. doi:10.1016/S0003-2670(99)00497-3

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Yang XW, Xu B, Wu J, Wang RQ, Cui JR (2006) Modern Chin Med 81(2):108–114. doi:10.1016/j.yexmp.2006.06.003

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Chen QH, Hou SX, Zheng J, Bi YQ, Yang XJ, Song XR (2007) J Chromatogr B 858(1–2):199–204. doi:10.1016/j.jchromb.2007.08.024

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Li CH, Chen AJ, Chen XF, Ma X, Chen XG, Hu ZD (2005) Biomed Chromatogr 19:696–702

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Li CH, Chen AJ, Chen XF, Chen XG, Hu ZD (2005) J Pharm Biomed Anal 39(1–2):125–131. doi:10.1016/j.jpba.2005.03.018

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This project was support by Key Technologies R&D Program of China (2006BAI14B07).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shijia Liu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liu, S., Ju, W., Xia, X. et al. Sensitive and Selective LC–ESI–MS Analysis of Aesculin in Rat Plasma. Chroma 70, 1121–1126 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1365/s10337-009-1306-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1365/s10337-009-1306-6

Keywords

Navigation