Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of Retention Indices of Some Monosubstituted Benzenes Calculated by Different Mathematical Methods in RP-LC

  • Full Short Communication
  • Published:
Chromatographia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In reversed phase liquid chromatography, the retention indices of benzene and nine mono substituted benzenes with different functionality based on the alkan-2-ones and alkyl aryl ketones retention index standards have been determined by the application of two new mathematical adaptation methods, viz. a multiparametric least-squares regression iterative method based on the determination of the adjusted retention times and a local cubic interpolation method directly using the total retention times. The two methods were applied to two types of columns. The first group includes four octadecyl-C18 columns with different packing materials obtained from different manufacturers, while the second comprises an octyl-C8 column. The retention indices have been extensively studied using either methanol–water or acetonitrile–water mobile phase systems. The influences of the concentration of the organic modifier in the mobile phase (methanol or acetonitrile), the column temperature, and the column packing material on retention indices of the set of the ten monoaromatics studied were also investigated. The calculated multiparametric retention indices values, those obtained by the local cubic interpolation and Kováts’ methods are compared. Good agreement was observed between the retention indices calculated by the three methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Ardrey RE, Moffat AC (1981) J Chromatogr A 220:195. doi:10.1016/S0021-9673(00)81925-1

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Smith RM, Hurdley TG, Gill R, Moffat AC (1984) Chromatographia 19:401. doi:10.1007/BF02687776

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kováts E (1985) Helv Chim Acta 41:1915. doi:10.1002/hlca.19580410703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kováts E (1965) Adv Chromatogr 1:229

    Google Scholar 

  5. Baker JK, Ma CY (1979) J Chromatogr A 169:107. doi:10.1016/0021-9673(75)85036-9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Baker JK, Cates LA, Corbett MD, Huber JW, Lattin DL (1982) J Liq Chromatogr 5(5):829. doi:10.1080/01483918208060616

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Smith RM (1982) J Chromatogr A 236:313. doi:10.1016/S0021-9673(00)84880-3

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Smith RM, Finn N (1991) J Chromatogr A 537:51. doi:10.1016/S0021-9673(01)88885-3

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bogusz M, Erkens M, Franke JP, Wijsbeek J, De Zeeuw RA (1993) J Liq Chromatogr 16(6):1341. doi:10.1080/10826079308020957

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Bogusz M, Hill DW, Rehorek (1996) J Liq Chromatogr Relat Technol 19(8):1291

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Wells MJM, Clark CR (1981) Anal Chem 53:1341. doi:10.1021/ac00232a009

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Berendsen GE, Schoenmakers PJ, de Galan L, Vigh G, Varga-Puchnoy Z, Inczedy J (1980) J Liq Chromatogr 3:1669. doi:10.1080/01483918008064759

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Slaats EH, Markovski W, Fekete J, Poppe H (1981) J Chromatogr A 207:299. doi:10.1016/S0021-9673(00)88734-8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. McCormick RM, Karger BL (1980) Anal Chem 52:2249. doi:10.1021/ac50064a005

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Knox JH, Kaliszan R, Kennedy GP (1980) Symp Faraday Soc 15:113. doi:10.1039/fs9801500113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Vigh G, Varga-Puchnoy Z (1980) J Chromatogr A 196:1. doi:10.1016/S0021-9673(00)80354-4

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Dominguez JAG, Munoz JG, Sanchez EF, Molera MJ (1977) J Chromatogr Sci 15:520

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wätzig H, Ebel S (1991) Chromatographia 31(11/12):544. doi:10.1007/BF02279473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Van Tulder PJM, Franke JP, De Zeeuw RA (1987) J High Resol Chromatogr 10:191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Guardino X, Albaigés J, Firpo G, Rodriguez-vinals R, Gassiot M (1976) J Chromatogr A 118:13. doi:10.1016/S0021-9673(00)81026-2

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Furr HC (1989) J Chromatogr Sci 27:216. doi:10.1007/BF02260449

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Grobler A, Balizs G (1974) J Chromatogr Sci 12:57

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Maeck M, Badjah Hadj Ahmed AY, Touabet A, Meklati BY (1986) Chromatographia 22:245. doi:10.1007/BF02268767

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Touabet A, Maeck M, Badjah Hadj Ahmed AY, Meklati BY (1988) Chromatographia 25:389–392. doi:10.1007/BF02324779

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

We thank Prof. Dr. W. Engewald from the Institute of Chemistry of the University of Leipzig for his precious help.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Linda Didaoui.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Didaoui, L., Larbi, H. & Touabet, A. Comparison of Retention Indices of Some Monosubstituted Benzenes Calculated by Different Mathematical Methods in RP-LC. Chroma 70, 921–926 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1365/s10337-009-1228-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1365/s10337-009-1228-3

Keywords

Navigation