Skip to main content
Log in

Development and Validation of an RP–LC–UV Method for the Determination of Ondansetron: Application to Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms

  • Original
  • Published:
Chromatographia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A new, simple, rapid, sensitive and specific isocratic RP–LC–UV method was developed and validated for the determination of ondansetron in pharmaceutical dosage forms of orally disintegrating tablets, oral solution and injection. The LC separation was achieved on a Hypersil C4 column (250 × 4.6 mm, 5 μm) using a mobile phase of 50 mM potassium dihydrogen phosphate anhydrous adjusted to pH 3.5 with orthophosphoric acid and acetonitrile (30:70, v/v) at a flow rate of 1.0 mL min−1 and UV detection at 310 nm. The method was validated for specificity, linearity, precision, accuracy, limit of quantification, limit of detection, robustness and solution stability. The calibration curve was linear over a concentration range of 100–1,000 ng mL−1 (r 2 = 0.9996) with limit of detection and limit of quantification 50 and 100 ng mL−1, respectively. The intra-day and inter-day precision and accuracy were between 0.79 and 2.37% and −0.64 and 1.65%, respectively. The method was successfully applied for analysis of ondansetron in the presence of excipients in commercially available pharmaceutical dosage forms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fabi A, Ciccarese M, Metro G, Savarese A, Giannarelli D, Nuzzo CM, Russillo M, Sperduti I, Carbone I, Bria E, Cognetti F (2008) Support Care Cancer 16:1375–1380. doi:10.1007/s00520-008-0438-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Michelle D, Suzanne L, Gilles C (1997) J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci 693:399–406. doi:10.1016/S0378-4347(97)00068-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Seynaeve C, Schuller J, Buser K, Porteder H, Van Belle S, Sevelda P, Christmann D, Schmidt M, Kitchener H, Pacs D, De Mulder PHM (1992) Br J Cancer 66:192–197

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ruff P, Paska W, Goedhals L, Pouiliarst P, Riviere A (1994) Oncology 51:113–118

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Italian Group for Antiemetic Research (IGAR) (1995) Ann Oncol 6:805–810

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kris MG, Hesketh PJ, Herrstedt J, Rittenberg C, Einhorn LH, Grunberg S, Koeller J, Olver I, Borjeson S, Ballatori E (2005) Support Care Cancer 13:85–96. doi:10.1007/s00520-004-0699-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Klancke J (2003) Dissol Technol 10:6–8

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Philip VC, Clive CF, Jonathan LP, Nicholas LS (1991) J Pharm Sci 80:868–871. doi:10.1002/jps.2600800913

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wang Y, Wu W, Huang M, Hu T, Sun NY, Que L (2005) Fudan Univ J Med Sci 32:55–58

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bauer S, Stormer E, Kaiser R, Tremblay PB, Brockmoller J, Roots I (2002) Biomed Chromatogr 16:187–190. doi:10.1002/bmc.125

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Depot M, Leroux S, Caille G (1997) J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci 693:399–406. doi:10.1016/S0378-4347(97)00068-6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Chandrasekar D, Ramakrishna S, Diwan PV (2004) Arzneimittelforschung 54:655–659

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Yannis D, Constantinos K, Georgia T, Yannis LL (2006) J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci 836:79–82. doi:10.1016/j.jchromb.2006.03.032

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Xu X, Bartlett MG, Stewart JT (2000) J Mass Spectrom 35:1329–1334. doi:10.1002/1096-9888(200011)35:11<1329::AID-JMS67>3.0.CO;2-G

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Abdel-Hamid ME, Sharma D (2005) J Liq Chromatogr Relat Technol 27:641–660. doi:10.1081/JLC-120028254

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Liu K, Dai X, Zhong D, Chen X (2008) J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci 864:129–136. doi:10.1016/j.jchromb.2008.02.002

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Venkateshwaran TG, Stewart JT, King DT (1996) J Liq Chromatogr Relat Technol 19:3355–3367. doi:10.1080/10826079608014584

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Krishnaiah YSR, Lakshmi M, Satyanarayana V, Bhaskar P (2002) Asian J Chem 14:1246–1250

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Patel NM, Fursule RA, Shirkhedkar AA, Talele GS (2006) Asian J Chem 18:2691–2694

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Graham CL, Dukes GE, Kao CF, Bertch JM, Hak LJ (1992) Ann Pharmacother 26:768–771

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Graham CL, Dukes GE, Fox JL, Kao CF, Hak LJ (1993) Am J Hosp Pharm 50:106–108

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Bosso JA, Prince RA, Fox JL (1992) Am J Hosp Pharm 49:2223–2225

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhang H, Ye L, Stewart JT (1998) J Liq Chromatogr Relat Technol 21:979–988. doi:10.1080/10826079808005863

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Zizkovsky V, Kucera R, Klimes J, Dohanal J (2008) J Chromatogr A 1189: 83–91. doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2007.12.017

    Google Scholar 

  25. Raval PB, Manisha P, Wadher SJ, Yeole PG (2008) Indian J Pharm Sci 70:386–390. doi:10.4103/0250-474X.43011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) (2005) Validation of analytical procedures: text and methodology Q2 (R1)

  27. USFDA (1994) Validation of chromatographic methods. US Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Centre for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), Rockville, MD

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Universiti Sains Malaysia for providing Short Term Grant (304/PFarmasi/638093) to support this work. The author (S. Ravi) gratefully acknowledges Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia for the granting of a Fellowship.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ravi Sheshala.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sheshala, R., Darwis, Y. & Khan, N. Development and Validation of an RP–LC–UV Method for the Determination of Ondansetron: Application to Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms. Chroma 70, 75–81 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1365/s10337-009-1117-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1365/s10337-009-1117-9

Keywords

Navigation