Skip to main content
Log in

Stability-Indicating HPTLC Method for the Determination of Tamsulosin in Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms

  • Full Short Communication
  • Published:
Chromatographia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A simple, sensitive, selective, precise and stability indicating high-performance thin-layer chromatographic method was developed for the determination of tamsulosin (TAM) in bulk and tablet formulation. Validation was carried out in compliance with International Conference on Harmonization guidelines. The method employed thin-layer chromatography aluminium plates pre-coated with silica gel 60F254 as the stationary phase and the mobile phase consisted of acetonitrile/methanol/dichloromethane (2.0: 1.0: 2.0, v/v/v). This solvent system was found to give compact spots for tamsulosin (R f = 0.27 ± 0.02). Densitometric analysis of TAM was carried out in the absorbance mode at 286 nm. Linear regression analysis showed good linearity (r 2 = 0.9993) with respect to peak area in the concentration range of 300–800 ng per band. The method was validated for precision, accuracy, ruggedness and recovery. Limits of detection and quantitation were 8.49 and 25.72 ng per band, respectively. TAM was subjected to acid and alkali hydrolysis, oxidation, photo degradation, dry heat and wet heat treatment. The drug underwent degradation under acidic, basic and photolytic conditions. The degraded products were well separated from the pure drug. Statistical analysis proved that the developed method, used for quantification of TAM as a bulk drug and present in pharmaceutical tablets, was reproducible and selective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. O’Neil MJ, Smith A, Heckelman PE, Budavari S (eds) (2001) The Merck index, 13 edn. Merck & Co. Inc., USA, pp 1615

  2. Macek J, Klíma J, Ptácek P (2004) J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci 809:307–311. doi:10.1016/j.jchromb.2004.06.043

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Matsushima H, Takanuki KI, Kamimura H, Watanabe T, Higuchi S (1997) J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci 695:317–327. doi:10.1016/S0378-4347(97)00200-4

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Keski-Rahkonen P, Pärssinen O, Leppänen E, Maurialaa T, Lehtonen M, Auriola S (2007) J Pharm Biomed Anal 43:606–612. doi:10.1016/j.jpba.2006.07.016

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ding L, Li L, Tao P, Yang J, Zhang Z (2002) J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci 767:75–81. doi:10.1016/S0378-4347(01)00546-1

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Qi M, Wang P, Liu L (2004) J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci 805:7–11. doi:10.1016/j.jchromb.2004.01.059

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Maier V, Horakova J, Petr J, Tesarova E, Coufal P, Sevcık J (2005) J Pharm Biomed Anal 39:691–696. doi:10.1016/j.jpba.2005.04.023

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhefeng Z, Gengliang Y, Guijian L, Haiyan L, Chen Y (2004) J Pharm Biomed Anal 34:689–693. doi:10.1016/S0731-7085(03)00555-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Rao RN, Kumar Talluri MVN, Narasa Raju A, Shinde DD, Ramanjaneyulu GS (2008) J Pharm Biomed Anal 46:94–103. doi:10.1016/j.jpba.2007.09.009

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. ICH (2003) ICH Q1A (R2) Stability testing of new drug substances and products. International Conference on Harmonization, Geneva, February, 2003

  11. Kulkarni SP, Amin PD (2000) J Pharm Biomed Anal 23:983–987. doi:10.1016/S0731-7085(00)00389-7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Thoppil SO, Cardoza RM, Amin PD (2001) J Pharm Biomed Anal 25:15–20. doi:10.1016/S0731-7085(00)00440-4

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Makhija SN, Vavia PR (2001) J Pharm Biomed Anal 25:663–667. doi:10.1016/S0731-7085(00)00586-0

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. ICH (1996) ICH Q1B, Harmonised tripartite guideline, photostability testing of new drug substances and products. In: Proceedings of the international conference on harmonization, Geneva, November, 1996

  15. Kaul N, Agrawal H, Abhilit K, Dhaneswar SR, Patil B (2005) Anal Chim Acta 536:49–70. doi:10.1016/j.aca.2004.12.041

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Alsante KM, Ando A, Brown R, Ensing J, Hatajik TD (2007) Adv Drug Deliv Rev 59:29–37. doi:10.1016/j.addr.2006.10.006

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. ICH (1994) ICH Q2A, Harmonised tripartite guideline, text on validation of analytical procedures, IFPMA, In: Proceedings of the international conference on harmonization, Geneva, March 1994

  18. ICH (2002) ICH Guidance on analytical method validation. In: Proceedings of the international convention on quality for the pharmaceutical industry, Toronto, Canada, September, 2002

Download references

Acknowledgments

Authors are grateful to Arti Drugs Ltd (Mumbai, India) for drug gift sample and to National Agriculture and Food Analysis and Research Laboratory, Pune and MAEER’s Maharashtra Institute of Pharmacy where the work has been carried out.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anna Pratima Ganpat Nikalje.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Choudhari, V.P., Nikalje, A.P.G. Stability-Indicating HPTLC Method for the Determination of Tamsulosin in Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms. Chroma 69, 1463–1467 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1365/s10337-009-1060-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1365/s10337-009-1060-9

Keywords

Navigation