Skip to main content
Log in

A Validated Stability Indicating LC Method for Mitotane in Bulk Drugs and Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms

  • Full Short Communication
  • Published:
Chromatographia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A novel, sensitive, stability indicating RP-LC method has been developed for the quantitative determination of mitotane, its impurity in both bulk drugs and pharmaceutical dosage forms. Efficient chromatographic separation was achieved using a C18 stationary phase with simple mobile phase combination delivered in an isocratic mode and quantitation was by ultraviolet detection at a wavelength of 230 nm. The mobile phase consisted of buffer and acetonitrile (25:75, v/v) delivered at a flow rate of 1.0 mL min−1. Buffer consisted of 10 mM potassium dihydrogen orthophosphate monohydrate, pH adjusted to 2.5 by orthophosphoric acid. In the developed LC method the resolution (R s ) between mitotane and its impurity namely Imp-1 was found to be greater than 2.5. Regression analysis shows an r value (correlation coefficient) greater than 0.999 for mitotane and its impurity. This method was capable to detect the impurity of mitotane at a level of 0.003% with respect to test a concentration of 0.2 mg mL−1 for a 10 μL injection volume. The inter- and intra-day precision values for mitotane and its impurity was found to be within 2.0% RSD. The method has shown good and consistent recoveries for mitotane in bulk drugs (99.2–101.5%), pharmaceutical dosage forms (98.2–103.1%) and for its impurity (99.7–102.1%). The test solution was found to be stable in diluent for 48 h. The drug was subjected to stress conditions of hydrolysis, oxidation, photolysis and thermal degradation. Considerable degradation was found to occur in basic stress hydrolysis. The stress samples were assayed against a qualified reference standard and the mass balance was found close to 99.97%. The developed RP-LC method was validated with respect to linearity, accuracy, precision and robustness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Touitou Y, Bogdan A, Legrand JC, Desgrez P (1977) Ann Endocrinol (Paris) 38(1):13–25

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Gebhardt DO, Moolenaar AJ, van Seters AP, van der Velde EA, Gevers Leuven JA (1992) Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 29:331–334

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Haak HR, Hermans J, van de Velde CJ, Lentjes EG, Goslings BM, Fleuren GJ, Krans HM (1994) Br J Cancer 69(5):947–951

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Baudin E, Pellegriti G, Bonnay M, Penfornis A, Laplanche A, Vassal G, Schlumberger M (2001) Cancer 92(6):1385–1392

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Jones RB, Frank R, Mass T (1983) CA Cancer J Clin 33:258–263. doi:10.3322/canjclin.33.5.258

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Terzolo M, Pia A, Berruti A, Osella G, Alì A, Carbone V, Testa E, Dogliotti L, Angeli A (2000) J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85:2234–2238

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. De Francia S, Pirro E, Zappia F, De Martino F, Sprio AE, Daffara F, Terzolo M, Berruti A, Di Carlo F, Ghezzo F (2006) J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci 837:69–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ali I, Aboul-Enein HY (2002) Environ Toxicol 17(4):329–333

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Andersen A, Kasperlik-Zaluska AA, Warren DJ (1999) Ther Drug Monit 21(3):355–359

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Andersen A, Warren DJ, Nome O, Vesterhus L, Slørdal L (1995) Ther Drug Monit 17(5):526–531

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Benecke R, Keller E, Vetter B, de Zeeuw RA (1991) Eur J Clin Pharmacol 41(3):259–261

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Musial SP, Freeman CJ, Sinsheimer JE (1985) J Chromatogr 319(3):467–470

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Moolenaar AJ, Niewint JW, Oei IT (1977) Clin Chim Acta 76(2):213–218

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Benecke R, Vetter B, De Zeeuw RA (1987) J Chromatogr 417(2):287–294

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Sinsheimer JE, Counsell RE, Cai W, Gopalaswamy R, Mahalakshmi P, Piñeiro-Sánchez ML, Ruangwises N, Schteingart DE (1996) J Pharm Biomed Anal 14(7):861–866. doi:10.1016/0731-7085(96)01729-3

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Inouye M, Mio T, Sumino K (1987) Clin Chim Acta 170(2–3):305–314

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Leutenegger M, Caron J, Couchot J, Gross A, Maes B, Enger A, Millart H (1977) Nouv Presse Med 6(7):566

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Morishita K, Okumura H, Takahashi N (2001) Toxicology 165(2–3):171–178. doi:10.1016/s0300-483X(01)00431-0

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. USP (2008) United States pharmacopoeia, 31st edn. United States Pharmacopeial Convention, Rockville

    Google Scholar 

  20. ICH guidelines on Validation of Analytical procedures, Text and Methodology Q2 (R1), FDA, Published in the Federal Register (1995) 60:11260

  21. Bakshi M, Singh S (2002) J Pharm Biomed Anal 28:1011–1040

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank the management of United States Pharmacopeia laboratory-India for supporting this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ravi Kiran Kaja.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kaja, R.K., Surendranath, K.V., Radhakrishnanand, P. et al. A Validated Stability Indicating LC Method for Mitotane in Bulk Drugs and Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms. Chroma 69, 1407–1412 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1365/s10337-009-1051-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1365/s10337-009-1051-x

Keywords

Navigation