Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comparison of the Separation Characteristics of the Organic–Inorganic Hybrid Stationary Phases XBridge C8 and Phenyl and XTerra Phenyl in RP-LC

  • Original
  • Published:
Chromatographia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Differences in the system constants of the solvation parameter model and retention factor correlation plots for varied solutes are used to study the retention mechanism on XBridge C8, XBridge Phenyl and XTerra Phenyl stationary phases with acetonitrile–water and methanol–water mobile phases containing from 10 to 70% (v/v) organic solvent. These stationary phases are compared with XBridge C18 and XBridge Shield RP18 characterized in an earlier report using the same protocol. The XBridge stationary phases are all quite similar in their retention properties with larger difference in absolute retention explained by differences in cohesion and the phase ratio, mainly, and smaller changes in relative retention (selectivity) by the differences in individual system constants and their variation with mobile phase type and composition. None of the XBridge stationary phases are selectivity equivalent but XBridge C18 and XBridge Shield RP18 have similar separation properties, likewise so do XBridge C8 and XBridge Phenyl, while the differences between the two groups of two stationary phases is greater than the difference within either group. The limited range of changes in selectivity is demonstrated by the high coefficient of determination (>0.98) for plots of the retention factors for varied compounds on the different XBridge phases with the same mobile phase composition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Poole CF (2003) The essence of chromatography. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cheng Y-F, Walter TH, Alden BA, Gendreau C, Neue UD, Grassi JM et al (2000) LC GC North Am 18:1162–1172

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Wyndham KD, O’Gara JE, Walter TH, Glose KH, Lawrence NL, Alden BA et al (2003) Anal Chem 75:6781–6788. doi:10.1021/ac034767w

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. O’Gara JF, Wyndham KD (2006) J Liq Chromatogr Rel Technol 29:1025–1045. doi:10.1080/10826070600574747

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gritti F, Perdu C, Guiochon G (2008) J Chromatogr A 1180:73–89. doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2007.12.022

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Gritti F, Guiochon G (2005) Anal Chem 77:1020–1030. doi:10.1021/ac040163w

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Mendez A, Bosch E, Roses M, Neue UD (2003) J Chromatogr A 986:33–44. doi:10.1016/S0021-9673(02)01899-X

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Davies NH, Euerby MR, McCalley DV (2008) J Chromatogr A 1178:71–78. doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2007.11.040

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Davies NH, Euerby MR, McCalley DV (2006) J Chromatogr A 1119:11–19. doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2005.11.096

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kiridena W, DeKay C, Villiere ND, Koziol WW, Poole CF (2005) Chromatographia 61:587–593. doi:10.1365/s10337-005-0559-y

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kiridena W, Poole CF, Atapattu SN, Qian J, Koziol WW (2007) Chromatographia 66:453–460. doi:10.1365/s10337-007-0355-y

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Vitha M, Carr PW (2006) J Chromatogr A 1126:143–194. doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2006.06.074

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Abraham MH, Ibrahim A, Zissimos AM (2004) J Chromatogr A 1037:20–47. doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2003.12.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Poole CF, Poole SK (2002) J Chromatogr A 965:263–299. doi:10.1016/S0021-9673(01)01361-9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Poole CF, Poole SK, Gunatilleka (2000) Adv Chromatogr 40:159–230

    Google Scholar 

  16. Chu Y, Poole CF (2003) J Chromatogr A 1003:113–121. doi:10.1016/S0021-9673(03)00845-8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kiridena W, Atapattu S, Poole CF, Koziol WW (2008) Chromatographia 68:11–17. doi:10.1365/s10337-008-0644-0

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Lazaro E, Rafols C, Roses M (2005) J Chromatogr A 1081:163–173. doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2005.05.048

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Lazaro E, Rafols C, Abraham MH, Roses M (2006) J Med Chem 49:4861–4870. doi:10.1021/jm0602108

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Snyder LR, Dolan JW, Carr PW (2004) J Chromatogr A 1060:77–116

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Poole CF, Ahmed H, Kiridena W, DeKay C, Koziol WW (2005) Chromatographia 62:553–561. doi:10.1365/s10337-005-0654-0

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Kiridena W, DeKay C, Koziol WW, Ali Z, Ahmed H, Poole CF (2006) Chromatographia 63:407–417. doi:10.1365/s10337-006-0794-x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Poole CF, Kiridena W, DeKay C, Koziol WW, Rosencrans RD (2006) J Chromatogr A 1115:133–141. doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2006.02.089

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Poole CF, Ahmed H, Kiridena W, DeKay C, Koziol WW (2007) Chromatographia 65:127–139. doi:10.1365/s10337-006-0131-4

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Bolliet D, Poole CF, Roses M (1998) Anal Chim Acta 368:129–140. doi:10.1016/S0003-2670(98)00190-1

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Roses M, Bolliet D, Poole CF (1998) J Chromatogr A 829:29–40. doi:10.1016/S0021-9673(98)00746-8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Roses M, Oumada FZ, Bosch E (2001) J Chromatogr A 910:187–194. doi:10.1016/S0021-9673(00)01192-4

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Abraham MH, Zhao YH (2005) Phys Chem Chem Phys 7:2418–2422. doi:10.1039/b502058a

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Abraham MH, Zhao YH (2005) J Org Chem 70:2633–2640. doi:10.1021/jo048078b

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Zhao JH, Carr PW (1999) Anal Chem 71:2623–2632. doi:10.1021/ac981321k

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Abraham MH, Martins F (2004) J Pharm Sci 93:1508–1523. doi:10.1002/jps.20070

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Lazaro E, Rafols C, Abraham MH, Roses M (2006) J Med Chem 49:4861–4870. doi:10.1021/jm0602108

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Poole SK, Poole CF (2008) J Sep Sci 31:1118–1123. doi:10.1002/jssc.200700546

    Google Scholar 

  34. Zhao JH, Carr PW (1998) Anal Chem 70:3619–3628

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Reta M, Carr PW, Sadek PC, Rutan SC (1999) Anal Chem 71:3484–3496. doi:10.1021/ac990081l

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Poole CF, Gunatilleka AD, Sethuraman R (2000) J Chromatogr A 885:17–39. doi:10.1016/S0021-9673(00)00224-7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Flint Group North America, Analytical and Physical Sciences Laboratory, 1130 James L. Hart Parkway, Ypsilanti, MI, 48197, USA

    Waruna Kiridena & Wladyslaw W. Koziol

  2. Department of Chemistry, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, 48202, USA

    Sanka N. Atapattu & Colin F. Poole

Authors
  1. Waruna Kiridena
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sanka N. Atapattu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Colin F. Poole
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Wladyslaw W. Koziol
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Colin F. Poole.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kiridena, W., Atapattu, S.N., Poole, C.F. et al. Comparison of the Separation Characteristics of the Organic–Inorganic Hybrid Stationary Phases XBridge C8 and Phenyl and XTerra Phenyl in RP-LC. Chroma 68, 491–500 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1365/s10337-008-0778-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1365/s10337-008-0778-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation