Skip to main content
Log in

Development and Validation of a GC–MS Method for the Determination of Methyl and Ethyl Camphorsulfonates in Esomeprazole Magnesium

  • Limited Short Communication
  • Published:
Chromatographia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A rapid gas chromatography–mass spectrometry method for the identification and determination of two carcinogenic impurities viz. methyl camphorsulfonate (MCS) and ethyl camphorsulfonate (ECS) in esomeprazole magnesium (EOM) is developed for the first time. The factors affecting method development and the fragmentation patterns of MCS and ECS based on the mass spectral analysis are described. The limit of detection and limit of quantitation values for both compounds were established as 3 and 10 ppm, respectively with respect to 50 mg mL−1 of EOM. The method is linear within the range of 10–120 ppm and found to be precise, accurate, specific and robust.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. International Conference on Harmonisation guideline on the Need for carcinogenicity studies of pharmaceuticals, S1A (1995) Testing for carcinogenicity of pharmaceuticals, S1B (1997) Dose selection for carcinogenicity studies of pharmaceuticals & limit dose, S1C(R2) (2008)

  2. International Conference on Harmonisation guideline on the Impurities in new drug substances, Q3A(R2) (2006)

  3. Onal A, Oztunc A (2006) J Food Drug Anal 14(1):12–18

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Patel BH, Suhagia BN, Patel MM, Patel JR (2007) Chromatographia 65(11–12):743–748

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hultman Ia, Stenhoff H, Liljeblad (2007) J Chromatagr B 848:317–322

  6. Toribio L, Alonso C, Nozal MJD, Bernal JL, Martin MT (2006) J Chromatagr A 1137(1):30–35

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Markovic N, Snezana AK, Beverley G, Prestidge CA (2006) J Pharm Biomed Anal 42(1):25–31

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Toribio L, Alonso C, Nozal MJD, Bernal JL, Jimenez JJ (2006) J Sep Sci 29(10):1363–1372

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bonato PS, Paias FO (2004) J Braz Chem Soc 15(2):318–323

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Orlando RM, Bonato PS (2003) J Chromatagr B 795(2):227–235

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Cass QB, Lima VV, Oliveira RV, Cassiano NM, Degani ALG, Pedrazzoli J (2003) J Chromatagr B 798(2):275–281

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Stenhoff H, Blomqvist Lagerstorm (1999) J Chromatagr B 734:191–201

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Eberle D, Hummel RP, Kuhn R (1997) J Chromatagr A 759:185–192

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Balmer K, Persson BA, Lagerstrom PO (1994) J Chromatagr A 660:269–273

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. International Conference on Harmonisation Guideline on Validation of Analytical Procedures, Q2 (R1) (2005)

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are highly thankful to Dr. Bandi Parthasarathi Reddy, CMD, Hetero Drugs Limited, Hyderabad for his encouragement and providing facilities to carry this research work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karipeddi Ramakrishna.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Raman, N.V.V.S.S., Reddy, K.R., Prasad, A.V.S.S. et al. Development and Validation of a GC–MS Method for the Determination of Methyl and Ethyl Camphorsulfonates in Esomeprazole Magnesium. Chroma 68, 675–678 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1365/s10337-008-0756-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1365/s10337-008-0756-6

Keywords

Navigation