Skip to main content
Log in

An Improved Method for Testing Weak VOCs in Dry Plants with a Purge and Trap Concentrator Coupled to GC-MS

  • Original
  • Published:
Chromatographia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purge and trap (P&T) technique was improved for measuring the release of organic compounds with weak volatility (weak VOCs) from dry plant materials. Using distilled water as a dispersant, the plant tissues were mulled and placed in the purge tube of a P&T concentrator. Then the sample-containing purge tube was heated to 80 °C with helium as the carrier gas, and the purged volatiles were preconcentrated in the trap prior to analysis with GC-MS. The VOCs in Chinese herbal medicinal plants Swertia tetraptera, Saussurea involucrate and S. lacostei, which had been stored dry for 1–2.5 years were assayed with this improved method and conventional P&T techniques. Our results show this new P&T method had great promise for determining the VOCs in dry plant materials. Using this new technique, we identified 38 weak VOCs with a large peak area from the dry samples. In contrast, less than five VOCs were detected by the conventional P&T method. So the improved heat-purge and trap system showed to be more efficient for measuring the release of the weak VOCs from dry plant materials.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Goff SA, Klee HJ (2006) Science 311:815–819. doi:10.1126/science.1112614

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kaack K, Christensen LP, Hughes M, Eder R (2005) Eur Food Res Technol 221(3/4):244–254. doi:10.1007/s00217-005-1141-4

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Enyedi AJ, Yalpani N, Silverman P, Raskin I (1992) Cell 70(6):879–886. doi:10.1016/0092–8674(92)90239-9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Prakash B, Pepich BV, Munch D (1998) American water works association meeting, pp 914–920

  5. Luis AJ, Mur PK, John D (1997) Trends Microbiol 5(8):297–300. doi:10.1016/S0966-842X(97)01097-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jiang L, Zang LH, Liu GH, Xiang FN, Xia GM (2005) J Shandong Univ 40(6):117–119

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Buddhadasa SC, Barone S, Gibson E, Bigger SW, Orbell JD (2002) J Soils Sedim 2(3):137–142

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Munch JW, Eichelberger JW (2000) J Chromatogr Sci 30:471–477

    Google Scholar 

  9. Li JS, Cai SQ (1998) Chin J Parmacol 33(8):449–453

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Okamoto HS, Steeber WR, Remoy J, Hill P, Perera SK (2002) California Department of Health Services, Division of Drinking Water and Environmental Management, Sanitation and Radiation Laboratories Branch, Berkeley, California, 94704

  11. Tholl D, Boland W, Armin H, Francesco L (2006) Plant J 45:540–546. doi:10.1111/j.1365-313X.2005.02612.x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Wilkes JG, Conte ED, Kim Y, Holcomb M, Sutherland JB, Miller DW (2000) J Chromatogr A 880:3–12. doi:10.1016/S0021-9673(00)00318-6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hyötyläinen T, Riekkola ML (2004) Anal Bioana Chem 378:1962–1981

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Saridara C, Brukh R, Mitra S (2006) J Sep Sci 29:446–452. doi:10.1002/jssc.200401897

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Bellar TA, Lichtenberg JJ (1974) J Am Water Works Assoc 66(12):739–744

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Heikes DL, Jensen SR, Fleming-Jones ME (1995) J Agric Food Chem 43(11):2869–2875. doi:10.1021/jf00059a018

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang DD, Wang GJ, Chen SL, You J (2000) J Instrum Anal 1:15–17

    Google Scholar 

  18. Li N, Liu JM, Wen MJ (2001) Chin J Chromatogr A 4:26–30

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ren YL, Yang JS (2001) J Chin Pharm 36(2):87–89

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

National Natural Science Foundation of China, no. 30470154, 30771116; the New Century Training Program Foundation for Talents by the Chinese Ministry of Education (NCET-05-0581); Doctor Station Foundation Fellowship Chinese Natural Education Ministry, no. 20050422015 supported this study.

The authors thank Roberta Greenwood for her help in editing this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Feng-Ning Xiang.

Additional information

Li-Hua Zang and Yan-Ling Liu contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zang, LH., Liu, YL., Liu, JQ. et al. An Improved Method for Testing Weak VOCs in Dry Plants with a Purge and Trap Concentrator Coupled to GC-MS. Chroma 68, 351–356 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1365/s10337-008-0733-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1365/s10337-008-0733-0

Keywords

Navigation