Skip to main content
Log in

Study on the Chromatographic Fingerprinting of Schisandra chinensis (Turcz.) Baill. by LC Coupled with Principal Component Analysis

  • Full Short Communication
  • Published:
Chromatographia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Schisandra chinensis (Turcz.) Baill. is a rich source of lignans with diverse biological activities. Quantitative analysis and chromatographic fingerprinting of the fruitlets of the plant by liquid chromatography (LC) were performed in order to characterize and evaluate the region-related variation. Using the optimized LC method, satisfactory linearity and repeatability were obtained for all the test standards. This method was subsequently applied for the identification and quantitation of six lignans in fruitlets of Schisandra chinensis by comparing the retention time with that of authentic standards available. Principal component analysis (PCA) was also employed to assess the similarity and dissimilarity of the fingerprint profiles from different origins encompassing eleven areas from China and two samples from Japan. The work suggested that the fruitlets of Schisandra chinensis from Japan exhibited great difference with those from China as evidenced by the clear separation in the PCA scores plot as well as quantitative analysis e.g., schisandrin and deoxyschisandrin are 5.50 μg mg−1 \( (\overline{X} ) \) and 0.90 μg mg−1 \( (\overline{X} ) \) in the materials from China and 3.40 μg mg−1 \( (\overline{X} ) \) and 1.90 μg mg−1 \( (\overline{X} ) \) in the materials from Japan, respectively. Such a reliable method potentially provides an effective and convenient method for quality control of herbal medicine from different regions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mu Y, Zhang J, Zhang S, Zhou HH, Toma D, Ren S, Huang L, Yaramus M, Baum A, Venkataramanan R, Xie W (2006) J Pharmacol Exp Ther 316(3):1369–1377

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Chen CC, Shen CC, Shih YZ, Pan TM (1994) J Nat Prod 57(8):1164–1165

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ikeya Y, Taguchi H, Yosioka I, Kobayashi H (1979) Chem Pharm Bull 27(6):1383–1394

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ikeya Y, Taguchi H, Yosioka I, Iitaka Y, Kobayashi H (1979) Chem Pharm Bull 27(6):1395–1401

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ikeya Y, Taguchi H, Mitsuhashi H, Takeda S, Kase Y, Aburada M (1988) Phytochemistry 27(2):569–574

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ikeya Y, Miki E, Okada M, Mitsuhashi H, Chai JG (1990) Chem Pharm Bull 38(5):1408–1411

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhu M, Chen XS, Wang KX (2007) Chromatographia 66(1–2):125–128

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Opletal L, Krenkova M, Havlickova P (2001) Ceska Slov Farm 50(4):173–180

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Yamada S, Murawaki Y, Kawasaki H (1993) Biochem Pharmacol 46:1081–1085

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kvasnickova L, Glatz Z, Sterbova H, Kahle V, Slanina J, Musil P (2001) J Chromatogr A 916(1–2):265–271

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Tong YY, Song WZ (1989) Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi 14(10):611–614

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wang K, Tong YY, Song WZ (1990) Yao Xue Xue Bao 25(1):49–53

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhu M, Cao Y, Fan GR (2007) J Sep Sci 30(1):67–73

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Avula B, Choi YW, Srinivas PV, Khan IA (2005) Chromatographia 61(9–10):515–518

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Goebel HH, Ikeda K, Schulz F, Burck U, Kohlschutter A (1981) Acta Neuropathol (Berl) 55(3):247–249

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Goebel HH, Warlo I, Klockgether T, Harzer K (1995) Am J Med Genet 57(2):187–190

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Li F, Yuan B, Xiong Z, Lu X, Qin F, Chen H, Liu Z (2006) Biomed Chromatogr 20(6–7):634–641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Misumi K, Hirakawa A, Sakamoto H, Shimizu R (1994) J Vet Med Sci 56(6):1075–1080

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Lindon JC, Holmes E, Nicholson JK (2007) Febs J 274:1140–1151

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Shanghai Leading Academic Discipline Project (grant no: T0301) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no: 30672636). The fruits of S. chinensis were identified by Dr. Eiji Miki of the Tsumura Central Laboratories, Tsumura and Co., Japan. The reference standards were supplied by the Tsumura Central Laboratories, Tsumura and Co., Japan.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yongyu Zhang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhang, Y., Dan, M., Wu, J. et al. Study on the Chromatographic Fingerprinting of Schisandra chinensis (Turcz.) Baill. by LC Coupled with Principal Component Analysis. Chroma 68, 101–104 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1365/s10337-008-0653-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1365/s10337-008-0653-z

Keywords

Navigation