Skip to main content
Log in

A Validated Stability-Indicating TLC Method for Determination of Forskolin in Crude Drug and Pharmaceutical Dosage Form

  • Original
  • Published:
Chromatographia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A simple, accurate, selective, precise, economical and stability-indicating high-performance thin-layer chromatographic method for analysis of forskolin in crude drug and in pharmaceutical dosage form was developed and validated. The method was developed on TLC aluminium plates precoated with silica gel 60F-254 using solvent system benzene:methanol (9:1, v/v), which gives compact spot of forskolin (R f value 0.25 ± 0.02). Densitometric analysis of forskolin was carried out in the absorbance mode at 545 nm after spraying with anisaldehyde sulphuric acid. The linear regression analysis data for the calibration plots showed good linear relationship with r = 0.994 and 0.994 with respect to peak height and peak area, respectively, in the concentration range 100–1,000 ng per spot. The limits of detection and quantification were 8.1 and 26.9 ng per spot, respectively. The proposed method was applied for determination of forskolin in Coleus forskohlii root and in capsule dosage forms, which showed 0.18 and 0.57% w/w of forskolin. Forskolin was subjected to acid and alkali hydrolysis, oxidation, photodegradation and heat degradation. It was observed that the drug is susceptible to acid, base hydrolysis, oxidation, photo-oxidation and heat degradation. Statistical analysis proves that the method is repeatable, selective and accurate for the estimation of forskolin in crude drug and in pharmaceutical dosage forms. The developed method effectively resolved the forskolin from components of C. forskohlii root, from excipients of capsule as well as the degradation products of forskolin hence, it can be employed for routine analysis and as a stability-indicating method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bhat SV, Bajwa BS, Dornauer H, De Souza NJ, Fehlhaber HW (1977) Tetrahedron Lett 19:1669–1672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Tandon JS, Dhar MM, Ramakumar S, Venkatesan K (1977) Indian J Chem 15B:880–883

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Dubey MP, Srimal RC, Nityanand S, Dhawan BN (1981) J Ethnopharmacol 3:1–13

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Seamon KB, Daly JW (1981) J Cyclic Nucleotide Res 7:201–224

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Wysham DG, Brotherton AF, Heistad DD (1986) Stroke 17:1299–1303

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Marone G, Columbo M, Triggiani M (1986) Agents Actions 18:96–99

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Roger PP, Servais P, Dumont JE (1990) Exp Cell Res 172:282–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Allen DO, Ahmed B, Naseer K (1986) J Pharmacol Exp Ther 238:659–664

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lichey I, Friedrich T, Priesnitz M, Biamino G, Usinger P, Huckauf H (1984) Lancet 2:167

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Caprioli J, Sears M (1983) Lancet 1:958–960

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Dubey MP, Srimal RC, Nityanand S, Dhawan BN (1981) J Ethnopharmacol 3:1–13

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Agarwal KC, Parks RE (1983) Int J Cancer 32:801–804

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ammon HP, Muller AB (1984) Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol 326:364–367

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Wong S, Mok W, Phaneuf S, Katz S, Salari H (1993) Eur J Pharmacol 245:55–61

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ding X, Staudinger JL (2005) J Pharmacol Exp Ther 312:849–856

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Yanagihara H, Sakata R, Shoyama Y, Murakami H (1996) Planta Med 62:169–172

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Schaneberg BT, Khan IA (2003) J AOAC Int 86:467–470

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Bonté F, Pinguet P, Saunois A, Chevalier JM, Meybeck A (1997) J Chromatogr A 791:231–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wagner H, Bladt S (1996) Plant drug Analysis: A thin layer chromatography atlas. Springer, New York, p 359

    Google Scholar 

  20. ICH (1994) Text on Validation of Analytical Procedures, Harmonised Tripartite Guideline prepared within the International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for the Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use, ICH-Q2A, Geneva

  21. ICH (1996) Validation of Analytical Procedures: Methadology, Harmonised Tripartite Guideline prepared within the International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for the Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use, ICH-Q2B, Geneva

  22. ICH (1995) Draft guidelines on validation of analytical procedures: definition and terminology, federal register, vol 60. IFPMA, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  23. ICH (2003) Stability testing of new drug substances and products (Q1AR2). In: Proceedings of the international conference on harmonization, IFPMA, Geneva

  24. Vishwakarma RA, Tyagi BR, Ahmed B, Hussain M (1988) Planta Med 54:471–472

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Saleem AM, Dhasan PB, Rafiullah MRM (2006) J Chromatogr A 1101:313–314

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful to Sami Labs Ltd., Bangalore for providing standard forskolin as a gift sample.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sayeed Ahmad.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ahmad, S., Rizwan, M., Parveen, R. et al. A Validated Stability-Indicating TLC Method for Determination of Forskolin in Crude Drug and Pharmaceutical Dosage Form. Chroma 67, 441–447 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1365/s10337-008-0521-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1365/s10337-008-0521-x

Keywords

Navigation