Abstract
A capillary column with a teicoplanin aglycone (TAG) stationary phase (CSP) was used for enantioselective separation of selected profen non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in capillary liquid chromatography (cLC). The effect of variations in the mobile phase composition on the retention and enantioselective separation was examined. The best resolution was attained in the mobile phase composed of 40/60 (v/v) methanol/1.0% triethylamine acetate buffer, pH 4.0 or 4.5. Under the optimized separation conditions, five of the set of eight analytes were enantioresolved with resolution values better than 0.9. Only fenoprofen was not enantioseparated in any system tested. The optimized separation conditions were used for evaluation of three chiral capillary columns (all prepared in the same way in our laboratory) in terms of the repeatability and reproducibility of the results. The run-to-run repeatability was expressed in terms of the relative standard deviation (RSD) values, obtained from ten independent measurements, for the following parameters: the retention factor for the first eluted enantiomer (k 1), the selectivity (α), the enantioresolution (R), the theoretical plate count per meter for the first eluted enantiomer (N 1) and the elution curve asymmetry for the first eluted enantiomer (As 1). None of the RSD values exceeded 8%. The column-to-column reproducibility of these parameters ranged between 1 and 9%. The results obtained with TAG based CSPs in cLC (a laboratory packed capillary column) were compared with those obtained by classical high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with a commercially available column. The cLC procedure provided a better enantioresolution and the elution curves had a better symmetry.



Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.References
Vissers JPC (1999) J Chromatogr A 856:117–143
Ishii D, Takeuchi T (1990) Trends Anal Chem 9:152–157
Jinno K (1988) Chromatographia 25:1004–1011
Chankvetadze L, Kartozia I, Yamamoto C, Chankvetadze B, Blaschke G, Okamoto Y (2002) J Sep Sci 25:653–660
Chankvetadze B, Kartozia I, Yamamoto C, Okamoto Y, Blaschke G (2003) J Pharm Biomed Anal 30:1897–1906
Prüß A, Kempter C, Gysler J, Jira T (2004) J Chromatogr A 1030:167–176
Beck WS, Geisslinger G, Engler H, Brune K (1991) Chirality 3:165–169
Dannhardt G, Kiefer W (2001) Eur J Med Chem 36:109–126
Landoni MF, Soraci A (2001) Curr Drug Metab 2:37–51
Okamoto Y, Aburatani R, Kaida Y, Hatada K, Inotsume N, Nakano M (1989) Chirality 1:239–242
Van Overbeke A, Baeyens W, Devaele C (1995) J Liq Chromatogr 18:2427–2443
Wilson WH (1994) Chirality 6:216–219
Gyllenhaal O, Stefansson M (2005) Chirality 17:257–265
De Vries JX, Schmitz-Kummer E, Siemon D (1994) J Liq Chromatogr 17:2127–2145
Haginaka J, Murashima T, Seyama C (1994) J Chromatogr A 677:229–237
Miwa T, Miyakawa T, Kayano M, Miyake Y (1987) J Chromatogr 408:316–322
Noctor TAG, Felix G, Wainer IW (1991) Chromatographia 31:55–59
Gilar M, Tesařová E, Deyl Z (1996) Chem Listy 90:461–466
Riering H, Sieber M (1996) J Chromatogr A 728:171–177
Catellani L, Flieger M, Sinibaldi M (1994) J Liq Chromatogr 17:3695–3703
Olšovská J, Flieger M, Bachechi F, Messina A, Sinibaldi M (1999) Chirality 11:291–300
Bosáková Z, Cuřínová E, Tesařová E (2005) J Chromatogr A 1088:94–103
Pehourcq F, Jarry C, Bannwarth B (2001) Biomed Chromatogr 15:217–222
Armstrong DW, Liu YB, Ekborg-Ott KH (1995) Chirality 7:474–497
Berthod A, Chen X, Kullmann JP, Armstrong DW, Gasparrini F, D’Acquarica I, Villani C, Carotti A (2000) Anal Chem 72:1767–1780
Ekborg-Ott KH, Kullman JP, Wang X, Gahm K, He L, Armstrong DW (1998) Chirality 10:627–660
Kafková B, Bosáková Z, Tesařová E, Coufal P, Messina A, Sinibaldi M (2006) Chirality 18:531–538
Kafková B, Bosáková Z, Tesařová E, Coufal P (2005) J Chromatogr A 1088:82–93
Liu Y, Berthod A, Mitchell CR, Xiao TL, Zhang B, Armstrong DW (2002) J Chromatogr A 978:185–204
Armstrong DW, Tang Y, Chen S, Zhou Y, Bagwill Ch, Chen JR (1994) Anal Chem 66:1473–1482
Chirobiotic handbook, 5th edn. Advanced Separation Technology (Astec), Whippany, 2004
Ward TJ, Farris AB (2001) J Chromatogr A 906:73–89
Alcaro S, D’Aquarica I, Gasparrini F, Misiti D, Pierini M, Villani C (2002) Tetrahedron 13:69–75
Peter A, Török R, Armstrong DW (2004) J Chromatogr A 1057:229–235
Planeta J, Karásek P, Vejrosta J (2003) J Sep Sci 26:525–530
Cortes HJ, Pfeiffer CD, Richter EB, Stevens TS (1987) J High Resol Chromatogr, Chromatogr Commun 10:446–448
Acknowledgments
Financial support from the long term research plan of the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic, No. MSM 0021620857, the Centrum No. 1M06011 and from the Grant Agency of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Project No. B400310504 is gratefully acknowledged.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Presented at: Advances in Chromatography and Electrophoresis 2007 and Chiranal 2007, Olomouc, Czech Republic, June 24–27, 2007.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vadinská, M., Bosáková, Z., Tesařová, E. et al. LC with a Teicoplanin Aglycone Chiral Sorbent for the Separation of the Enantiomers of Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs: An Evaluation of Chiral Capillary Columns. Chroma 67 (Suppl 1), 33–40 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1365/s10337-007-0481-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1365/s10337-007-0481-6


