Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of UPLC and HPLC for Determination of trans-10-Hydroxy-2-Decenoic Acid Content in Royal Jelly by Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction with Internal Standard

  • Original
  • Published:
Chromatographia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The ultra performance liquid chromatography (UPLC) and high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method was developed and compared to detect the trans-10-hydroxy-2-decenoic acid (10-HDA) content in royal jelly cream and lyophilized powder. The sample was extracted using absolute ethanol based on the ultrasound-assisted extraction. Chromatographic separation of 10-HDA and methyl 4-hydroxybenzoate as internal standard was carried out on a Nova-pak® C18 column for HPLC and on Acquity BEH C18 column for UPLC. In the HPLC system, the average recoveries were 95.0–99.2% (= 5) with relative standard deviation (RSD) values of 1.1–2.1% for royal jelly cream and 98.0–100.0% (= 5) with RSD values of 1.6–3.0% for lyophilized powder, respectively. The limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantitation (LOQ) were 0.5 and 1.5 mg kg−1 for both royal jelly cream and lyophilized powder. In the UPLC system, the limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantitation (LOQ) were 0.3 and 1.0 mg kg−1 for both royal jelly cream and lyophilized powder. The major advantages of UPLC, using 1.7 μm particles, over HPLC are the speed of analysis, the narrower peaks and the decrease of solvent consumption for the 10-HDA in the analyses of beeproducts. The two methods were validated for the determination of practical royal jelly products. The concentration of 10-HDA ranges from 1.26 to 2.25% for pure royal jelly cream samples and 3.01–6.26% for royal jelly lyophilized powder samples. For 30 royal jelly products, the 10-HDA content varied from no detectable to 1.005%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Münstedt K, von Georgi R (2003) Am Bee J 43:647–650

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wang GY, Lin ZB (1996) Chin J Pharm Toxicol 1:53–55

    Google Scholar 

  3. Rembold H (1965) Vitam Horm 23:359–382

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Iannuzzi J (1990) Am Bee J 130:587–589

    Google Scholar 

  5. Inoue SI, Koya-Miyata S, Ushio S, Iwaki K, Ikeda M, Kurimoto M (2003) Exp Gerontol 38:965–969

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Dixit PK, Patel NG (1964) Nature 202:189–190

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kramer KJ, Tager HS, Childs CN, Speirs RD (1977) J Insect Physiol 23:293–295

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Fujii A, Kobayashi S, Kuboyama N, Furukawa Y, Kaneko Y, Ishihama S, Yamamoto H, Tamura T (1990) Jpn J Pharmacol 53:331–337

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Townsend GF, Morgan JF, Hazlett B (1959) Nature 183:1270–1271

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Townsend GF, Morgan JF, Tolnai S, Hazlett B, Morton HJ, Shuel RW (1960) Cancer Res 20:503–510

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Barker SA, Foster AB, Lamb DC, Hodgson N (1959) Nature 183:996–997

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. The Ministry of Agriculture of P.R.C. (2002) Nuisanceless food—the quality standard of royal jelly and lyophilized powder

  13. Bloodworth BC, Harn CS, Hock CT (1995) J AOAC Int 78:1019–1023

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Dai F, Li L (1990) Chin J Pharm Anal 10:108–109

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang X, Fu CY, Yang RF (1989) Chem J Chin Univ 10:609–613

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Genc. M, Aslan A (1999) J Chromatogr A 839:265–268

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Long ZX, Wan CH, Wang K, Liu BP, Hu HS (2005) Chin Food Sci 26:170–172

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Chen XP, Ni L, Zhao DH (2005) Pract Prev Med 12:172–172

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Swartz ME (2005) LC-GC North Am 23:8–14

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ultra Performance LCTM by design, Waters Corporation, USA, 720000880EN LL&LW-UL (2004)

  21. Luque de Castro MD, Da Silva MP (1997) Trends Analyt Chem 16:16–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Pacakova V, Štulik K, Jiskra J (1996) J Chromatogr A 754:17–31

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Hercegova A, Domotorova M, Matisova E, Kirchner M, Otrekal R, Stefuca V (2005) J Chromatogr A 1084:46–53

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaofeng Xue.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhou, J., Zhao, J., Yuan, H. et al. Comparison of UPLC and HPLC for Determination of trans-10-Hydroxy-2-Decenoic Acid Content in Royal Jelly by Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction with Internal Standard. Chroma 66, 185–190 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1365/s10337-007-0305-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1365/s10337-007-0305-8

Keywords

Navigation