Skip to main content
Log in

Validated Chiral LC Method for the Enantiomeric Separation of β-Amino-β-(3-Methoxyphenyl) Propionic Acid

  • Full Short Communication
  • Published:
Chromatographia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A chiral liquid chromatographic method for enantiomeric resolution of β-amino-β-(3-methoxyphenyl) propionic acid was developed and validated. The “hybrid” π-electron donor–acceptor based stationary phase (R,R) Whelk-01 was found to be enantiomerically selective for (R) and (S) enantiomers of β-amino-β-(3-methoxyphenyl) propionic acid with a resolution greater than 2.0. The effects of isopropyl alcohol and ethanol on enantioselectivity and resolution of enantiomers were evaluated. Calibration curves were linear over the range of 0.10–1.00, with a regression coefficient (r) of 0.999. The limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ) were 300 and 1,000 ng mL−1 respectively for 10 μL injection volume. The percentage RSD of the peak area of six replicate injections of (S) enantiomer at LOQ concentration was 2.8. The percentage recovery of (S) enantiomer from (R) enantiomer samples ranged from 92 to 102. The test solution was observed to be stable up to 24 h after the preparation. The developed normal phase chiral LC method can be used for the enantiomeric purity evaluation of R-β-amino-β-(3-methoxyphenyl) propionic acid.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tan CYK, Weaver DF (2002) Tetrahedron 58:7449–7461

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Soloshonok VA, Fokina NA, Rybakova AV, Shishkina IP, Galushko SV, Sorochinsky AE, Kukhar VP, Savchenko MV, Svedas VK (1995) Tetrahedron Asymmetry 6:1601–1610

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Davankov VA (1997) Pure Appl Chem 69:1469–1474

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Berkecz R, Sztojkov-Ivanov A, Ilisz I, Forro E, Fulop F, Ho Hyun M, Peter A (2006) J.Chromatogr A 1125:138–143

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Snyder L, Kirkland JJ, Glajch J (1997) Practical HPLC method development, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  6. United States Pharmacopiea (2004) Asian edition, pp 621, 1225

  7. Rao RN, Raju AN, Nagaraju D (2006) J Pharm Biomed Anal 41:766–773

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Miller JM, Crowther JB (2000) Analytical chemistry in a GMP environment, pp 436

  9. International conference on harmonization October (1994), Text on Validation of Analytical Procedures Q2A

  10. International conference on harmonization November (1996), Validation of Analytical Procedures Methodology Q2B

  11. Bakshi M, Singh S (2002) J Pharm Biomed Anal 28:1011–1040

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Rao BM, Srinivasu MK, Balamurali K, Acharyulu PVR, Kumar RP, Chandrashekar KB (2005) Indian Drugs 42(5)

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank the management of Dr. Reddy’s group for supporting this work (part of Ph. D work). The authors wish to acknowledge the Process Research group for providing the samples to carry out the above work. The authors also like to thank colleagues in Analytical Research of Custom Pharmaceutical Services for their co-operation in carrying out this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bandlamudi Mallikarjuna Rao.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Madhavan, P., Rao, B.M., Pravin, B. et al. Validated Chiral LC Method for the Enantiomeric Separation of β-Amino-β-(3-Methoxyphenyl) Propionic Acid. Chroma 66, 243–246 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1365/s10337-007-0284-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1365/s10337-007-0284-9

Keywords

Navigation