Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of Mobile Phase pH* on Chromatographic Behaviour in Chiral Ligand-Exchange Thin-Layer Chromatography (CLETLC) of Amino Acid Enantiomers

  • Published:
Chromatographia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The enantiomers of some amino acids have been separated on commercial chiral TLC plates in reversed-phase mode. The effect of the pH* of the aqueous-organic mobile phase on the retention and mobility of the enantiomers and on selectivity was investigated. It was shown that for most of the amino acids investigated the highest enantioselectivity was obtained at pH* 3–4 or 6–7. The drift and disturbance of the baseline on the chromatograms were also much smaller at pH* 3–4 and 6–7.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Davankov VA (1988) In: Davankov VA, Navratil JD, Walton HF (eds) Ligand exchange chromatography. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA, pp 67–175

  • Davankov VA, Rogozin SV (1971) J Chromatogr 60:280–283

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Günther K (1988) J Chromatogr 448:11–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veigl E, Lindner W (1994) J Chromatogr A 660:255–268

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grobuschek N, Schmid MG, Tuscher C, Ivanova M, Gübitz G (2002) J Pharm Biomed Anal 27:599–605

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miyazawa T, Minowa H, Imagawa K, Yamada T (2004) Chromatographia 60:45–50

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nikoliæ N, Veselinoviæ D, Vuèina J, Lingeman H, Karljikoviæ-Rajiæ K (2003) J Pharm Biomed Anal 32:1159–1166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huyn MH, Han ChS, Lee ChW, Lee YK (2002) J Chromatogr A 950:55–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Günther K, Möller K (2003) In: Sherma J, Fried B (eds) Handbook of thin-layer chromatography, 3rd edn. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 471–535

  • Nyiredy Sz, Dallenbach-Toelke K, Sticher O (1988) J Chromatogr 450:241–252

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nyiredy Sz (2002) J Planar Chromatogr 15:454–457

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Siouffi A-M, Piras P, Roussel Ch (2005) J Planar Chromatogr 18:5–12

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Polak B, Gołkiewicz W (1996) Chem Anal (Warsaw) 41:931–937

    Google Scholar 

  • Chai Z, Xu S, Hou X (2004) Chromatographia 60:25–31

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gołkiewicz W, Polak B (1994) J Planar Chromatogr 6:453–457

    Google Scholar 

  • Lepri L, Del Bubba M, Cincinelli A (2003) In: Nyiredy Sz (ed) Planar chromatography. A retrospective view for the third millennium. Springer, Research Institute for Medicinal Plants, Budakalasz, Hungary, pp 516–549

  • Bushan R, Martens J (2003) In: Sherma J, Fried B (eds) Handbook of thin-layer chromatography, 3rd edn. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 389–425

  • Dzido TH, Soczewiñski E (1990) J Chromatogr 516:461–466

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. Polak.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Polak, B., Gołkiewicz, W. & Tuzimski, T. Effect of Mobile Phase pH* on Chromatographic Behaviour in Chiral Ligand-Exchange Thin-Layer Chromatography (CLETLC) of Amino Acid Enantiomers. Chroma 63, 197–201 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1365/s10337-005-0681-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1365/s10337-005-0681-x

Keywords

Navigation