Skip to main content
Log in

Use of High-Performance Liquid Chromatography–UV and Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry for Determination of the Imidacloprid Content of Honeybees, Pollen, Paper Filters, Grass, and Flowers

  • Published:
Chromatographia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Imidacloprid is a new insecticide with a wide range of action. Because honeybees are very sensitive to this substance, two techniques (HPLC–UV and GC–MS) which enable its detection in several matrices of both animal and vegetable origin were used to monitor its possible presence in cultivated land. In the first method quantification of imidacloprid in honeybees was achieved by use of the external standard method; the detection limit was 50 mg kg−1, the linear range 0.05–1 mg mL−1, recovery 60–83%, and the imprecision (coefficient of variation) 8.6% for repeatability and 11.8% for reproducibility. Recovery from pollen was 71–98% in the range 0.05–0.5 mg kg−1. The repeatability was 9.2–13.9%. Imidacloprid can often be found in the environment, not as a simple molecule but as a group of degradation products. The GC–MS method could be used to quantify all these species as oxidation products and to determine the initial quantity of imidacloprid by use of a conversion factor. The liquid chromatographic analysis could be used to detect, in a standard solution, 10 ng mL−1 derivatized 6-chloronicotinic acid. The linearity was good (R=0.999) over a wide concentration range (10 μg mL−1–10 ng mL−1). Several samples with different matrices (filter paper placed on an pneumatic corn seed drill, grass, flowers, honeybees, etc.) obtained during the sowing period for imidacloprid-treated corn were analyzed. The quantification limit (LOQ) was 0.005 mg kg−1 for grass and flowers, 0.002 mg kg−1 for honeybees, and 0.024 mg kg−1 for paper filters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Sheets LP (2001) In: Krieger R (ed) Imidacloprid: handbook of pesticide toxicology. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 1123–1130

  • Kidd H, James DR (1991) The agrochemicals handbook, 3rd edn. Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, UK

  • Meister RT (1994) Farm chemicals handbook. Meister, Willoughby, OH

  • Roberts T, Hutson D (1999) Metabolic pathways of agrochemicals. Part 2: insecticides and fungicides, Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Baid D, Lummis SCR, Leicht W, Breer H, Sattelle DB (1991) Pestic Sci 33:197–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchail S, Guez D, Belzunces LP (2000) Environ Toxicol Chem 19:1901–1905

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porrini C, Ghini S, Girotti S, Sabatini AG, Gattavecchia E, Celli G (2002) In: Devillers J, Pham-Delègue MH (eds) Honeybees: the environmental impact of chemicals. Routledge–Taylors and Francis, London, pp 186–247

  • Celli G, Maccagnani B (2003) Bull Insectol 56:137–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Porrini C, Sabatini AG, Girotti S, Fini F, Monaco L, Celli G, Bortolotti L, Ghini S (2003) Bull Insectol 56:147–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Maus C, Curé G, Schmuck R (2003) Bull Insectol 56:51–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchail S, Guez D, Belzunces LP (2001) Environ Toxicol Chem 20:2482–2486

    Google Scholar 

  • Nauen R, Ebbinghaus-Kintscher U, Schmuck R (2001) Pestic Manag Sci 57:577–586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmuck R, Schoning R, Stork A, Schramel O (2001) Pestic Manag Sci 57:225–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wamhoff H, Schneider VJ (1999) Agric Food Chem 47:1730–1734

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rouchaud J, Gustin F, Wauters A (1994) Bull Environ Toxicol 53:344–350

    Google Scholar 

  • Sur R, Stork A (2003) Bull Insectol 56:35–40

    Google Scholar 

  • US Environmental Protection Agency (1994) Imidacloprid pesticides fact sheet, USEPA, Washington, DC

  • US Environmental Protection Agency (1995) Imidacloprid, pesticide tolerance and raw agricultural commodities, 40 CFR Part 180 Section 472

  • Mukherjee I, Gopal M (2000) Pestic Manag Sci 56:932–936

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greatti M, Sabatini AG, Barbattini R, Rossi S, Stravisi A (2003) Bull Insectol 56:69–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonmatin JM, Moineau I, Charvet R, Fleche C, Colin ME, Bengsch ER (2003) Anal Chem 75:2027–2033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plake FJ, Weber E (1993) Pflanzenschutz–Nachrichten Bayer 46:109–181

    Google Scholar 

  • Baskaran S, Kookana RS, Naidu R (1997) J Chromatogr A 787:271–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald LM, Meyer TR (1998) J Agric Food Chem 46:3133–3138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macke M (1998) J AOAC Int 81:344–348

    Google Scholar 

  • Schöning R, Schmuck R (2003) Bull Insectol 56:41–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez-Alba AR, Tejedor A, Aguera A, Contreras M, Garrido J (2000) J AOAC Int 83:748–755

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schöning R (2001) Pflanzenschutz–Nachrichten Bayer 54:413–452

    Google Scholar 

  • Vìlchez JL, Valencia MC, Navalòn A, Molinero-Morales B, Capitàn-Vallvey LF (2001) Anal Chim Acta 439:299–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frenich AG, Gonzalez FJE, Vidal JLM, Vazquez PP, Sanchez MM (2000) J Chromatogr A 869:497–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossi S, Dalpero AP, Ghini S, Colombo R, Sabatini AG, Girotti S (2001) J Chromatogr A 905:223–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments.

This study was funded through grants from MIUR (Ministero dell’Istruzione, della Università e della Ricerca, projects of National Interest) and the University of Bologna (Funds for Selected Research Topics).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Girotti.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rossi, S., Sabatini, A., Cenciarini, R. et al. Use of High-Performance Liquid Chromatography–UV and Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry for Determination of the Imidacloprid Content of Honeybees, Pollen, Paper Filters, Grass, and Flowers. Chroma 61, 189–195 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1365/s10337-004-0474-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1365/s10337-004-0474-7

Keywords

Navigation