Advertisement

HMD Praxis der Wirtschaftsinformatik

, Volume 55, Issue 1, pp 133–150 | Cite as

Product Lifecycle Management im Konzernumfeld – Herausforderungen, Lösungsansätze und Handlungsempfehlungen

  • Manuel HollerEmail author
  • Christian Dremel
  • Matthias Herterich
  • Falk Uebernickel
  • Walter Brenner
Schwerpunkt

Zusammenfassung

Für produzierende Unternehmen hat sich Product Lifecycle Management in den letzten Jahrzehnten in wachsendem Maße zu einem strategisch wichtigen Ansatz entwickelt. Forciert durch steigende Effektivitäts- und Effizienzanforderungen stellen viele Unternehmen ihre Product Lifecycle Management-Prozesse und -Informationssysteme auf den Prüfstand, wobei besonders große, heterogene Industriekonzerne mit weitreichenden Aufgaben bei der Strategieentwicklung und -umsetzung betraut sind. Basierend auf einer Einzelfallstudie bei einem weltweit führenden, diversifizierten Konglomerat beschreibt der vorliegende Beitrag entlang eines etablierten Analyseframeworks Herausforderungen und Lösungsansätze im Product Lifecycle Management im Konzernumfeld. Als zentraler Inhalt werden Handlungsimplikationen auf strategischer, organisationaler, prozessualer und informationstechnologischer Ebene abgeleitet. Für Manager in fertigenden Unternehmen bietet die Fallstudie einen wertvollen Überblick über relevante Aspekte. Für industrienahe Forscher zielt die Fallstudie auf ein besseres Verständnis des Phänomens Product Lifecycle Management im Kontext von Großunternehmen ab und trägt zur Erweiterung des Wissensfundus bei.

Schlüsselwörter

Product Lifecycle Management Konzern Handlungsempfehlungen Transformation Fallstudie 

Product Lifecycle Management in the Corporate Setting of Multinationals – Challenges, Approaches to Solution and Recommendations for Action

Abstract

Over the last decades, product lifecycle management has increasingly evolved to a strategically important approach for manufacturers. Accelerated by rising demands for effectiveness and efficiency, many companies are scrutinizing their product lifecycle management processes and information systems, whereby particularly large, heterogeneous industrial corporations are charged with far reaching tasks in strategy development and realization. Grounded on a single-case study at a globally leading diversified conglomerate, the paper at hand outlines challenges and approaches to solution in product lifecycle management in conglomerate environment along a well-established analysis framework. As central content, managerial implications at a strategic, organizational, processual, and technological layer are derived. For executives in manufacturing industries, the case study provides a valuable overview of relevant aspects. For industry-related scholars, the case study targets an enhanced understanding of the phenomenon product lifecycle management in the context of large organizations and contributes to this body of knowledge.

Keywords

Product lifecycle management Corporation Recommendations for action Transformation Case study 

Notes

Danksagung

Dieser Beitrag entstand in Zusammenarbeit mit den Partnerunternehmen des Kompetenzzentrums „Industrial Services and Enterprise Systems“ (CC ISES) am Institut für Wirtschaftsinformatik der Universität St.Gallen sowie dem Schweizerischen Nationalfonds zur Förderung der wissenschaftlichen Forschung (SNF).

Literatur

  1. Abramovici M, Göbel JC (2012) Decision support framework for PLM harmonization projects within industrial companies. In: Rivest L, Bouras A, Louhichi B (Hrsg) Product Lifecycle management – Towards knowledge-rich enterprises. Springer, Berlin, S 535–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alam I (2005) Fieldwork and data collection in qualitative marketing research. Qual Mark Res 8:97–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ameri F, Dutta D (2005) Product lifecycle management: closing the knowledge loops. Comput Des Appl 2:577–590Google Scholar
  4. Bergsjö D (2015) The PLM user perspective: identification of user needs and their organisational impacts. Int J Prod Lifecycle Manag 8:172–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beuren FH, Gomes Ferreira MG, Cauchick MPA (2013) Product-service systems: a literature review on integrated products and services. J Clean Prod 47:222–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bokinge M, Malmqvist J (2012) PLM implementation guidelines – relevance and application in practice: a discussion of findings from a retrospective case study. Int J Prod Lifecycle Manag 6:79–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boschert S, Rosen R (2016) Digital twin – The simulation aspect. In: Hehenberger P, Bradley D (Hrsg) Mechatronic futures: challenges and solutions for mechatronic systems and their designers. Springer, Cham, S 59–74Google Scholar
  8. Brenner W, Karagiannis D, Kolbe L, Krüger J, Lamberti H‑J, Leifer L, Leimeister JM, Österle H, Petrie C, Plattner H, Schwabe G, Uebernickel F, Winter R, Zarnekow R (2014) User, use & utility research – The digital user as new design perspective in business and information systems engineering. Bus Inf Syst Eng 1:55–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cantamessa M, Montagna F, Neirotti P (2012) An empirical analysis of the PLM implementation effects in the aerospace industry. Comput Ind 63:243–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cao H, Folan P (2012) Product life cycle: the evolution of a paradigm and literature review from 1950–2009. Prod Plan Control 23:641–662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chen DQ, Mocker M, Preston DS, Teubner A (2010) Information systems strategy: reconceptualization, measurement, and implications. MIS Q 34:233–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. CIMdata (2016) PLM Market & Solution provider report – How did PLM Solution Provider revenues perform in 2015? http://www.cimdata.com/en/research/plm-market-analysis-report-series. Zugegriffen: 1. Nov. 2016Google Scholar
  13. Coyne IT (1997) Sampling in qualitative research. Purposeful and theoretical sampling; merging or clear boundaries? J Adv Nurs 26:623–630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. David M, Rowe F (2015) Le management des systemes PLM (product lifecycle management): Un agenda de recherche. J Decis Syst 24:273–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. D’Avolio E, Bandinelli R, Rinaldi R (2017) A process-oriented framework for PLM implementation in fashion companies. Int J Prod Lifecycle Manag 10:191–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Eigner M, Roubanov D (2014) Modellbasierte virtuelle Produktentwicklung. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Eigner M, Stelzer R (2008) Product Lifecycle Management – Ein Leitfaden für Product Development und Life Cycle Management. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  18. Eisenhardt KM (1989) Building theories from case study research. Acad Manag Rev 14:532–550Google Scholar
  19. Feldhusen J, Gebhardt B (2008) Product Lifecycle Management für die Praxis – Ein Leitfaden zur modularen Einführung, Umsetzung und Anwendung. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  20. Görg A (2006) Product Lifecycle Management: Ein Überblick. HMD Prax Wirtschaftsinform 249:1–12Google Scholar
  21. Grieves M (2006) Product lifecycle management: driving the next generation of lean thinking. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. Grindstaff CC (2011) Closing the gap: how companies achieve smarter new product development and make better decisions with technology. Harvard Business Review Analytic Services, BostonGoogle Scholar
  23. Heaton J (2004) Reworking qualitative data. SAGE, Thousand OaksCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Johanning V (2014) IT-Strategie – Optimale Ausrichtung der IT an das Business in 7 Schritten. Springer, WiesbadenGoogle Scholar
  25. Kiritsis D (2011) Closed-loop PLM for intelligent products in the era of the Internet of things. Comput Des 43:479–501Google Scholar
  26. Lehmhus D, Wuest T, Wellsandt S, Bosse S, Kaihara T, Thoben K‑D, Busse M (2015) Cloud-based automated design and additive manufacturing: a usage data-enabled paradigm shift. Sensors 15:32079–32122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mangiapane M, Büchler RP (2016) Modernes IT-Management. Methodische Kombination von IT-Strategie und IT-Reifegradmodell. Springer, WiesbadenGoogle Scholar
  28. Rowe F (2014) What literature review is not: diversity, boundaries and recommendations. Eur J Inf Syst 23:241–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Saaksvuori A, Immonen A (2002) Product lifecycle management. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  30. Scheer A‑W (2013) Wirtschaftsinformatik – Referenzmodelle für industrielle Geschäftsprozesse. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  31. Scheer A‑W, Boczanski M, Muth M, Schmitz W‑G, Segelbacher U (2006) Prozessorientiertes Product Lifecycle Management. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  32. Schultze U, Avital M (2011) Designing interviews to generate rich data for information systems research. Inf Organ 21:1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Schwalbe K (2015) Information technology project management. Course Technology, BostonGoogle Scholar
  34. Sinkovics R, Penz E, Ghauri PN (2005) Analysing textual data in international marketing research. Qual Mark Res 8:9–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Stark J (2015) Product lifecycle management: 21st century paradigm for product realisation. Springer, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Strahringer S (2011) Glossar zu Strategisches IT-Management. HMD Prax Wirtschaftsinform 284:111–113Google Scholar
  37. Strauss AL, Corbin JM (1990) Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques. SAGE, Newbury ParkGoogle Scholar
  38. Tang D, Qian X (2008) Product lifecycle management for automotive development focusing on supplier integration. Comput Ind 59:288–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Terzi S, Bouras A, Dutta D, Garetti M, Kiritsis D (2010) Product lifecycle management – From its history to its new role. Int J Prod Lifecycle Manag 4:360–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. VDI (2016) VDI-Richtlinie 2219 – Informationsverarbeitung in der Produktentwicklung – Einführung und Betrieb von PDM-SystemenGoogle Scholar
  41. Vom Brocke J, Simons A, Niehaves B, Riemer K, Plattfaut R, Cleven A (2015) Standing on the shoulders of giants: challenges and recommendations of literature search in information systems research. Commun Ais 37:205–224Google Scholar
  42. Webster J, Watson R (2002) Analyzing the past to prepare the future: writing a literature review. MIS Q 26:xiii–xxiiiGoogle Scholar
  43. Yin RK (2003) Case study research – design and methods. SAGE, LondonGoogle Scholar
  44. Yin RK (2013) Validity and generalization in future case study evaluations. Evaluation 19:321–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Manuel Holler
    • 1
    Email author
  • Christian Dremel
    • 1
  • Matthias Herterich
    • 1
    • 2
  • Falk Uebernickel
    • 1
  • Walter Brenner
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut für WirtschaftsinformatikUniversität St.GallenSt.GallenSchweiz
  2. 2.Center for Design ResearchStanford UniversityStanfordUSA

Personalised recommendations