Chromatographia

, 70:1759 | Cite as

Quantitation of Eugenol, Cinnamaldehyde and Isoeugenol from Cinnamomum tamala Nees and Eberm. Leaf Powder and Cinnamomum zeylanicum Breyn Stem Bark Powder by LC

  • Vidya V. Dighe
  • Atish A. Gursale
  • Gauri A. Charegaonkar
Limited Short Communication
First Online:
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:

Abstract

An LC method has been developed for the simultaneous quantitative determination of eugenol, cinnamaldehyde and isoeugenol from dried leaf powder of Cinnamomum tamala Nees & Eberm and stem bark powder of Cinnamomum zeylanicum Breyn. Linear responses for eugenol, cinnamaldehyde and isoeugenol were obtained over the concentration ranges of 0.20–2.50, 5.00–100.00 and 0.10–1.00 μg mL−1, respectively.

Keywords

Column liquid chromatography Eugenol, isoeugenol and cinnamaldehyde Cinnamomum tamala Nees & Eberm leaf powder Cinnamomum zeylanicum Breyn stem bark powder 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. 1.
    The Wealth of India (1992) Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, New Delhi, 8:580–583Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dighe VV, Gursale AA, Sane RT, Menon S, Patel PH (2005) Chromatographia 61:443–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kar A, Choudhary BK, Bandyopadhyay NG (2003) J Ethnopharmacol 84:105–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kapoor LD (2000) CRC Handbook of ayurvedic medicinal plants. CRC Press, Florida, p 117Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Showkat RM, Mohammed A, Kapoor R (2004) Flavour Fragr J 19:112–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kim SH, Hyun SH, Choung SY (2006) J Ethnopharmacol 104:119–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Khan A, Khattak KN, Safdar M et al (2003) Diabetes Care 26:3215–3218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ross MSF (1976) J Chromatogr A 118:273–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    George JD, Price CJ, Mar MC, Myers CB, Jahnke GD (2001) Toxicol Sci 60:112–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Atsumi T, Fujisawa S, Tonosaki K (2005) Toxicol In Vitro 19:1025–1033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pawar VC, Thaker VS (2006) Mycoses 49:316–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wijesekera ROB, Jayewardene AL, Rakapakse LS (1974) J Sci Food Agric 25:1211–1220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fischer IU, Dengler HJ (1990) J Chromatogr 525:369–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kermasha S, Goetghebeur M, Dumont J (1994) Lebensm Wiss Technol 27(6):578–582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yuwono M, Siswandono, Hafid AF, Poernomo AT, Agil M, Indrayanto G, Ebel S (2002) Analytical profiles and drug substances and excipients. Academic Press, Elsevier Science (USA) 29:149–177Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Subash Babu P, Prabuseenivasan S, Ignamauthu S (2007) Phytomedicine 14(1):15–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    San M, Wan DWR, Bakar MA, Kadhum Abul Amir HJ (1995) J Am Oil Chem Soc 72(10):1231–1233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Smith RM, Beck S (1984) J Chromatogr 291:424–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Luo JP, Zhang ZS, Tian C, Li XM (2000) Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi 25(9):544–545Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lungarini S, Aureli F, Coni E (2008) Food Addit Contam 25(11):1297–1305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Yong-Hong Li, Sun Zhi-Hao, Zheng Pu (2004) Chromatographia 60:709–713Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Synder LR, Kirland JJ, Glajch JL (1997) Practical HPLC method development, 2nd edn. Wiley, USAGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    ICH (1996) Validation of analytical procedures: methodology, ICH harmonised tripartite guidelines, adopted 6 Nov, 1996Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Vieweg+Teubner | GWV Fachverlage GmbH 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vidya V. Dighe
    • 1
  • Atish A. Gursale
    • 1
  • Gauri A. Charegaonkar
    • 1
  1. 1.Ramnarain Ruia CollegeMumbaiIndia

Personalised recommendations