Chromatographia

, Volume 68, Supplement 1, pp 91–95 | Cite as

Redox Status of Main Urinary Sulfur Amino Acids Evaluation by Liquid Chromatography

  • Krzysztof Kuśmierek
  • Grażyna Chwatko
  • Edward Bald
Full Short Communication

Abstract

Thiol redox status, defined as reduced-to-oxidized ratio, of main urinary aminothiols has been measured. Both forms of thiols were determined by liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection. The analytes were derivatized with thiol-specific ultraviolet labeling reagent, 2-chloro-1-methylquinolinium tetrafluoroborate, separated chromatographically and detected at 355 nm. Oxidized forms were converted to their thiol counterparts by reductive cleavage with tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine hydrochloride prior to derivatization step. Redox status of cysteine and cysteinylglycine was determined in urine of 45 healthy volunteers distributed for age. There were no significant differences in cysteine redox status depending on the age (P > 0.05), whereas cysteinylglycine redox status was significantly lower in children than in adults (P < 0.01). Total cysteine and cysteinylglycine in urine, normalized on creatinine, were also studied. Excretion of these thiols showed a wide range of variation, however mean values were not significantly different (P > 0.05) between age groups.

Keywords

Column liquid chromatography Redox status Cysteine and cysteinylglycine in urine 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Publication is supported by the European Social Fund and Budget of State implemented under the Integrated Regional Operational Program. Project: GRRI-D.

References

  1. 1.
    Pastore A, Massoud R, Motti C, Lo Russo A, Fucci G, Cortese C, Federici G (1998) Clin Chem 44:825–832Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kuśmierek K, Glowacki R, Bald E (2006) Anal Bioanal Chem 385:855–860CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jones DP, Go YM, Anderson CL, Ziegler TR, Kinkade JM, Kirlin WG (2004) FASEB J 18:1246–1248Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Moriarty-Craige SE, Jones DP (2004) Annu Rev Nutr 24:481–509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zinellu A, Sotgia S, Usai MF, Chessa R, Deiana L, Carru C (2005) Electrophoresis 26:1963–1968CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dröge W (2002) Exp Gerontol 37:1331–1343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Williams RH, Maggiore JA, Reynolds RD, Helgason CM (2001) Clin Chem 47:1031–1039Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rebrin I, Sohal RS (2004) Exp Gerontol 39:1513–1519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bald E, Glowacki R (2001) J Liq Chromatogr Relat Technol 24:1323–1339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kuśmierek K, Bald E (2008) Chromatographia 67:23–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fermo I, Arcelloni C, Paroni R (2002) Anal Biochem 307:181–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lochman P, Adam T, Friedecky D, Hlidkova E, Skopkova Z (2003) Electrophoresis 24:1200–1207CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Friedr. Vieweg & Sohn Verlag/GWV Fachverlage GmbH 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Krzysztof Kuśmierek
    • 1
  • Grażyna Chwatko
    • 1
  • Edward Bald
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Environmental ChemistryUniversity of LodzLodzPoland

Personalised recommendations