Skip to main content
Log in

Isolation and TLC Densitometric Quantification of Gallicin, Gallic Acid, Lupeol and β-Sitosterol from Bergia suffruticosa, a Hitherto Unexplored Plant

  • Original
  • Published:
Chromatographia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Bergia suffruticosa (Elatinaceae family) is an important Indian medicinal plant hitherto unexplored for its chemical constituents and its pharmacological activity. In the present paper we report our work on isolation of gallicin, gallic acid, lupeol and β-sitosterol from the plant. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of these four compounds from this plant. Further, these four marker compounds were quantified by thin layer chromatography densitometric methods using high performance thin layer chromatography. The thin layer chromatography densitometric methods were found to be precise with RSD for intra-day in the range of 0.61–1.83, 1.14–1.57, 0.38–0.52 and 0.15–0.52 and for inter-day in the range of 0.97–1.45, 0.58–1.27, 0.42–0.50 and 0.26–0.61 for different concentrations of gallicin, gallic acid, lupeol and β-sitosterol. Instrumental precision was 1.05, 1.20, 0.65 and 0.85 (% RSD) for gallicin, gallic acid, lupeol and β-sitosterol. Accuracy of the method was checked by conducting recovery studies at three different levels for the four compounds and the average percentage recoveries obtained were 99.89, 100.58, 99.79 and 100.11%. B. suffruticosa sample was found to contain 0.34% w/w of gallicin, 0.288% w/w of gallic acid, 0.064% w/w of lupeol and 0.034% w/w of β-sitosterol.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kirtikar KR, Basu BD (1991) Indian medicinal plants, vol I, 2nd edn. Bishen Singh Mahendra Pal Singh, Dehradun, India, p 253

  2. Wealth of India—a dictionary of Indian raw materials, industrial products (1988) vol II, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), New Delhi, India, p 120

  3. Reviews on Indian Medicinal Plants (2004) vol IV, Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), New Delhi, India, pp 119–200

  4. Yousif G, Iskander GM, Eisa EB (1983) Fitoterapia 54:81–85

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bedi SJ (1978) Econ Bot 32:278–284

    Google Scholar 

  6. Farouk A, Bashir AK, Salih AKM (1983) Fitoterapia 54:3–7

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ahmed EM, Bashir AK, El Kheir YM (1984) Planta Med 50:74–77

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Anandjiwala S, Srinivasa H, Kalola J, Rajani M (2007) J Nat Med 61:59–62

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Westenburg HE, Lee KJ, Lee SK, Fong HH, van Breemen RB, Pezzuto JM, Kinghorn AD (2000) J Nat Prod 63:1696–1698

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Galato D, Ckless K, Susin MF, Giacomelli C, Ribeirodo-Valle RM, Spinelli A (2001) Redox Rep 6:243–250

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Cho EJ, Yokozawa T, Rhyu DY, Kim SC, Shibahara N, Park JC (2003) Phytomedicine 10:544–551

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kumaran A, Karunakaran RJ (2006) Foods Hum Nutr 61:1–5

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lim MY, Park YH, Son DJ, Kim MK, Lee HS (2004) Food Sci Biot 13:806–809

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Bailey AE, Asplund RO, Ali MS (1986) J Nat Prod 49:1149–1150

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Oh SH, Jeong KJ, Sa JH, Shin IC, Park KY, Kim TW, Lee TW, Han KS, Shim TH, Choi SW, Ham SS (2005) Rep Inst Health Environ 16:70–82

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kim SJ, Jin M, Lee E, Moon TC, Quan Z, Yang JH, Son KH, Kim KU, Son JK, Chang HW (2006) Arch Pharm Res 29:874–878

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Edwin H (1995) J Nat Prod 59:205–215

    Google Scholar 

  18. Liu Z, Schwimer J, Liu D, Lewis J, Greenway FL, York DA, Woltering EA (2006) Phytotherapy Res 20:806–813

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Geetha T, Varalakshmi P (2001) J Ethnopharmacol 76:77–80

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Shirwaikar A, Shetty M, Bommu P (2004) Indian J Exp Biol 42:686–690

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ziegler HL, Franzyk H, Sairafianpour M, Tabatabai M, Tehrani MD, Bagherzadeh K, Hagerstrand H, Staerk D, Jaroszewski JW (2004) Bioorg Med Chem 12:119–127

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Vivancos M, Moreno JJ (2005) Free Radic Biol Med 39:91–97

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Delporte C, Backhouse N, Erazo S, Negrete R, Vidal P, Silva X, Lopez-Perez JL, Feliciano AS, Munoz O (2005) J Ethnopharmacol 99:119–124

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. McAnuff MA, Harding WW, Omoruyi FO, Jacobs H, Morrison EY, Asemota HN (2005) Food Chem Toxicol 43:1667–1672

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Bagul MS, Ravishankara MN, Padh H, Rajani M (2003) J Nat Rem 3:83–89

    Google Scholar 

  26. Pathak S, Niranjan K, Padh H, Rajani M (2004) Chromatographia 60:241–244

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Bagul MS, Srinivasa H, Padh H, Rajani M (2005) J Separation Sci 28:581–584

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Dhalwal K, Biradar YS, Rajani M (2006) J AOAC International 89:619–623

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Quality Standards of Indian Medicinal Plants (2005) vol. III, Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), New Delhi, India, pp 98–106, 236–245

  30. Cynthia JM, Kane, Jay H Menna, Yun-Chi Yeh (1988) Biosci Rep 8:85–94

  31. Han SS, Lo SC, wa Choi Y, Kim JH, Back SH (2004) Bull Korean Chem Soc 25:389–391

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Calzada F, Cerda-Garcia-Rojas C, Meckes M, Cedillo-Rivera R, Bye R, Mata R (1999) J Nat Prod 62:705–709

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. The Merck Index (1989) Susan Budavari (ed) 11th edn. Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, pp 1079, 1556, 5478 and 8500

  34. Gohar AA, Lahloub MF, Niwa M (2003) Z Naturforsch 58c:670–674

    Google Scholar 

  35. Khalid S, Yagi S, Khristova P, Duddeck H (1989) Planta Med 55:556–558

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Evans WC (2002) Pharmacognosy, 15th edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 221–224

  37. Ravishankara MN, Shrivastava N, Padh H, Rajani M (2001) Planta Med 67:294–296

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Kalola J, Rajani M (2006) Chraomatographia 63:475–481

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Quality Standards of Indian Medicinal Plants (2005) vol II, Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), New Delhi, India, pp 119–128

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the Industrial Commissionerate, Government of Gujarat, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India for grant towards infrastructure and Dr. Harish Padh, Director, B. V. Patel PERD Centre, for facilities.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mandapati Rajani.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Anandjiwala, S., Srinivasa, H. & Rajani, M. Isolation and TLC Densitometric Quantification of Gallicin, Gallic Acid, Lupeol and β-Sitosterol from Bergia suffruticosa, a Hitherto Unexplored Plant. Chroma 66, 725–734 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1365/s10337-007-0389-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1365/s10337-007-0389-1

Keywords

Navigation