Preparative Liquid Chromatography and Centrifugal Partition Chromatography for Purification of New Anticancer Precursors
- 78 Downloads
Abstract
In organic synthesis, the purification of reactional intermediates or final products is generally carried out by normal phase flash chromatography. However, for dihydrodipyridopyrazines, a new family of antitumor agents, the efficiency of this technique is too low to achieve the purification of the isomer mixture. Purification of the DHDPP isomer mixture has therefore been studied using preparative liquid chromatography. With the stationary phase used in flash chromatography, PLC provides greater efficiency and allows to increase the mobile phase flow rate. A complete study of preparative purification was performed, including that of compounds solubility and analytical optimization. This work has allowed to lower the overlap between the two DHDPP isomers, to greatly reduce the total duration of the process, to increase the purified quantity per run and consequently to greatly improve the throughput of the purification. In addition, this technique can be easily and totally automated. Concurrently, another purification method (centrifugal partition chromatography ), based on acidic constants difference of the two components in two immiscible liquids, was developed. CPC has demonstrated its ability to separate the two DHDPP isomers. Finally, the economic aspects of PLC and CPC results are compared.
Keywords
Column liquid chromatography Centrifugal partition chromatography Preparative scale separation Separation of dihydrodipyridopyrazines Antitumor agentsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- Colin H, Hilaireau P (1991) Pharmaceutical Manufacturing International 143–145Google Scholar
- Rodriguez I, Kuehm-Caubère C, Vinter-Pasquier K, Renard P, Pfeiffer B, Caubère P (1998) Tetrahedron Lett 39:7283–7286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Blanchard S, Guillaumet G, Kuehm-Caubère C, Atassi G, Renard P, Caubère P, Pfeiffer B, Pierre A, Rodriguez I, Vinter-Pasquier K (2000) U.S. Patent No. 6,127,369Google Scholar
- Denny WA, Baguley BC, Cain BF, Waring MJ (1983) In: Antitumor acridines. Molecular aspects of anti-cancer drug action, Neidle S, Warning MJ (eds) Verlag Chemie, England, pp.1–34Google Scholar
- Brãna MF, Castellano JM, Morán M, Pérez de Vega MJ, Romerdahl CR, Qian XD, Bousquet P, Emling F, Schlick E, Keilhauer G (1993) Anti-Cancer Drug Des 8:257–268Google Scholar
- Garbay-Jaureguiberry C, Barsi MC, Jacquemin-Sablon A, Le Pecq JB, Roques BP (1992) J Med Chem 35:72–81PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Leng F, Priebe W, Chaires JB (1998) Biochemistry 37:1742–1753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hernandez L, Cholody WM, Hudson EA, Resau JH, Pauly G, Michejda CJ (1995) Cancer Res 55:2338–2345PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Foucault AP (1995) In: Centrifugal Partition Chromatography, Chromatographic Science Series, Volume 68, Marcel Dekker, New York.Google Scholar
- Ito Y, Ma Y (1996) J Chromatogr A 753:1–36CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Renold P, Madero E, Maetzke T (2001) J Chromatogr A 908:143–148CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Meyer VR (1984) J Chromatogr 316:113–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sarker M, Katti AM, Guiochon G (1996) J Chromatogr A 719:275–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Koh JH, Broyles BS, Guan-Sajonz H, Hu MZC, Guiochon G (1998) J Chromatogr A 813:223–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Knox JH, Pyper HM (1986) J Chromatogr 363:1–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gareil P, Rosset R (1988) J Chromatogr 450:13–25Google Scholar
- Guiochon G, Golshan-Shirazi S, Katti AM (1994) In: Fundamentals of Preparative and Nonlinear Chromatography, Academic PressGoogle Scholar
- Viron C, Pennanec R, André P, Lafosse M (2000) J Liq Chrom & Rel Technol 23 (11):1681–1688Google Scholar