Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention

, Volume 5, Issue 5, pp 82–87 | Cite as

Failure analysis of NiTi wires used in medical applications

  • B. James
  • J. Foulds
  • L. Eiselstein
Peer Reviewed Articles

Abstract

Superelastic nitinol (NiTi) wires have been fractured under various loading, temperature, and environmental conditions. The fracture surfaces of these NiTi specimens were then characterized using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to provide a reference for future NiTi failure analysis investigations and to provide comparison with the existing literature. The results of this study indicate that NiTi fracture modes and morphologies are generally consistent with those for ductile metals, such as austenitic stainless steel, with one important exception: NiTi exhibits a unique compressive damage mechanism that occurs at high strains in bending. Compression-induced surface damage is observed at the compression-side of tight bends or kinks in NiTi wire. In these same samples, no cracking or surface damage is observed on the tensile side of the bend. Compressive damage begins as slip line formation due to plastic deformation, and at high strain levels, cracking is observed. These compression-damage induced cracks appear to initiate from slip lines and extend in a mode II/shear mechanism.

Keywords

compressive damage failure analysis fracture nitinol 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    K. Gall, N. Yang, H. Sehitoglu, and Y. Chumlyakov: “Fracture of Precipitated NiTi Shape Memory Alloys,” Int. J. Fracture, 2001, 109, pp. 189–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    W. Miao, X. Mi, M. Zhu, J. Guo, and Y. Kou: “Effect of Surface Preparation on Mechanical Properties of a NiTi Alloy,” Mater. Sci. Forum, 2002, 394–395, pp. 173–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    C.R.F. Azevedo and E. Hippert, Jr.: “Failure Analysis of Surgical Implants in Brazil,” Eng. Fail. Anal., 2002, 9, pp. 621–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    R. Vaidyanathan, D.C. Dunand, and U. Ramamurty: “Fatigue Crack-Growth in Shape-Memory NiTi and NiTi-TiC Composites,” Mat. Sci. Eng. A, 2000, 289, pp. 208–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    M. Reinoehl, D. Bradley, R. Bouthot, and J. Proft: “The Influence of Melt Practice of Final Fatigue Properties of Superelastic NiTi Wires,” SMST 2000, SMST Society, Inc., Menlo Park, CA.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    R.L. Holtz, K. Sadanada, and M.A. Imam: “Fatigue Thresholds of Ni-Ti Alloy Near the Shape Memory Transition Temperature,” Int. J. Fatigue, 1999, 21, S137–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    B.L. Pelton, T. Slater, and A.R. Pelton: “Effects of Hydrogen in TiNi,” SMST-97, SMST Society, Inc., Menlo Park, CA, pp. 395–400.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    B. James, S. Murray, and S. Saint: “Fracture Characterization in Nitinol,” Proceedings of the International Conference on Shape Memory and Superelastic Technologies, SMST Society, Inc., Menlo Park, CA, 2004, pp. 321–29.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© ASM International 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. James
    • 1
  • J. Foulds
    • 1
  • L. Eiselstein
    • 1
  1. 1.Exponent Failure Analysis AssociatesMenlo Park

Personalised recommendations