Skip to main content
Log in

Modeling of stress ratio effect on Al alloy SAE AMS 7475-T7351: Influence of loading direction

  • Published:
Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The main goal of this work was to evaluate the effectiveness of Walker’s equation in collapsing the fatigue crack propagation data of a SAE AMS 7475-T7351 aluminum alloy loaded either longitudinally (L-T) or transversely (T-L) to the rolling direction. T-L orientation testpieces presented lower ductility and fracture toughness values than L-T orientation. As a consequence, during the fatigue crack propagation tests, T-L testpieces exhibited a stronger influence of monotonic modes of fracture, resulting in higher Paris exponent values,m. Walker’s model was able to collapse fatigue crack propagation data of L-T test pieces at different applied stress ratios,R. However, for the T-L orientation, due to theR ratio dependency onm andC, simply averaging ofm values for the calculations of Walker’s exponent proved to be inefficient. A simple analytical procedure was proposed by the authors to modify Walker’s model to take into account such effect. For T-L test pieces, when Walker’s model is modified by considering both Paris’s exponent as well the coefficient as a function of theR ratio, the fatigue crack growth data collapses within a narrow band, thus allowing predictions to be made satisfactorily. The collapsed band is even narrower if the empirical relationm=a+blogC is used instead of simple polynomial equations due to a better correlation coefficient.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. R.G. Forman, V.E. Keary, and R.M. Engle, Numerical Analysis of Crack Propagation in Cyclic-Loaded Structures,J. Basic Eng., 1967,89, p 459–464

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. Weertman, Rate of Growth of Fatigue Cracks Calculated from the Theory of Infinitesimal Dislocations Distributed on a Plane,Int. J. Fract. Mech., 1966, 2460–2467

  3. M. Klesnil and P. Lukas, Influence of Strength and Stress History on Growth and Stabilization of Fatigues Cracks,Eng. Fract. Mech., 1972,4, p 77–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. R.J. Donahue, H.M. Clark, P. Atanmo, R. Kumble, and A.J. McEvily, Crack Opening Displacement and the Rate of Fatigue Crack Growth,Int. J. Fract. Mech., 1972,8, p 209–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. A.J. McEvily, On Closure in Fatigue Crack Growth,Mechanics of Fatigue Crack Closure, ASTM STP 982, 1988, p 35–43

  6. A.K. Vasudevan, K. Sadananda, and N. Louat, A Review of Crack Closure, Fatigue Crack Threshold and Related Phenomena,Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 1994,188A, p 1–22

    Google Scholar 

  7. A.J. McEvily and R.O. Ritchie, Crack Closure and Fatigue Crack Propagation Threshold as a Function of Load Ratio,Fat. Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct., 1998,21, p 847–855

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. D. Kujawski, A New (ΔK+Kmax)0.5 Driving Force Parameter for Crack Growth in Aluminum Alloys,Int. J. Fat., 2001,23, p 733–740

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. D. Kujawski, Enhanced Model of Partial Crack Closure for Correlation of R-ratio Effects in Aluminum Alloys,Int. J. Fat., 2001,23, p 95–102

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. W.T. Riddel and R.S. Piascik, Stress Ratio Effects on Crack Opening Loads and Crack Growth Rates in Al Alloy 2024,NASA, 1998,TM-206929, p 1–17

    Google Scholar 

  11. K. Walker, The Effect of Stress Ratio During Crack Propagation and Fatigue for 2024-T3 and 7075-T6 Aluminum,Effects of Environment and Complex Load History on Fatigue Life, ASTM STP462, 1970, p 1–14

  12. A.R. Rosenfeld, Fracture Mechanics in Failure Analysis,Metals Handbook: Fatigue and Fracture, 10th ed., vol. 19, ASM International, 1997, p 450–456

  13. J. Zheng and B.E. Powell, Effect of Stress Ratio and Test Methods on Fatigue Crack Growth Rate for Nickel Based Superalloy Udimet720,Int. J. Fat., 1999,21(5), p 507–513

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. SAE AMS 2355, Quality Assurance Sampling and Testing of Aluminum Alloys and Magnesium Alloys,Wrought Products, Except Forging Stock, and Rolled, Forged, Or Flash Welded Rings, Aer. Mat. Spec., SAE Int., 2002

  15. “Standard Test Method for Measurement of Fracture Toughness. American Society for Testing and Materials,” E1820-01,Annual Book of ASTM Standards, vol.03.01, ASTM, 2001

  16. “Standard Test Methods for Tension Testing of Metallic Materials [Metric]. American Society for Testing and Materials,” E8M-00,Annual Book of ASTM Standards, vol.03.01, ASTM, 2000

  17. “Standard Test Method for Measurement of Fatigue Crack Growth Rates. American Society for Testing and Materials,” E647-00,Annual Book of ASTM Standards, vol.03.01, ASTM, 2000

  18. C. Cui, R. Wu, Y. Li, and Y. Shen, Fracture Toughness of In Situ TiCp-AlNp/AL Composite,J. Mater. Proc. Tech., 2000,100, p 36–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. W.H. Hunt, T. Osman, and J.J. Lewandowski, Micro and Macrostructural Factors in DRA Fracture Resistance,J. Mater., 1993,45(1), p 30–35

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. I.C. Stone and P. Tsakiropoulos, The Effect of Reinforcement on the Notched and Unnotched Room Temperature Tensile Properties of AL-4wt.%Cu:SiC MMCs,Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 1998,A241, p 19–29

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. C.P. You, A.W. Thompson, and I.M. Bernstein, Aging Effects on Fatigue Crack Growth and Closure in a SiC Reinforced 2124 Aluminum Composite,J. Metall., 1988,40(7), p A88

  22. E.H. Niccolls, A Correlation for Fatigue Crack Growth Rate.Scripta Metall. Scripta Metall., 1976,10, p 295–298

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. Di Todaro.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Di Todaro, E., Ruckert, C.T.O.F., Milan, M.T. et al. Modeling of stress ratio effect on Al alloy SAE AMS 7475-T7351: Influence of loading direction. J. of Materi Eng and Perform 15, 608–613 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1361/105994906X136160

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1361/105994906X136160

Keywords

Navigation