Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention

, Volume 6, Issue 6, pp 54–69 | Cite as

A brief history of fractography

Peer Reviewed Articles

Abstract

Fracture surfaces have, no doubt, been studied throughout the history of mankind, probably starting with observations on stone-age tools. In the 16th to 18th centuries, the macroscopic appearance of fracture surfaces was used to assess the quality of metallic materials, with studies by Réaumur in 1722 being the most notable. However, it was not until 1943 that fracture surfaces were first examined at high magnifications (using optical microscopy up to 1000 ×), and that the first attempts were made to examine replicas of fracture surfaces using transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Early replicas had poor fidelity and resolution, and it was not until 1956 that Crussard et al. pioneered high-resolution TEM fractography using shadowed, direct-carbon replicas. This technique (and its subsequent variations) revolutionized fractography and led to a plethora of studies in the 1960's and 70's. It therefore seems appropriate to commemorate the 50th anniversary of high-resolution electron fractography with a review of how it, and subsequent scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and other techniques, have led to a better understanding of fracture processes. Such understanding has been invaluable in failure analysis and in developing improved materials. Milestone observations for a number of important models of fracture in inert environments including cleavage, brittle intergranular fracture, dimpled overload fractures, and fatigue fractures, are described first, followed by examples of key observations for fractures produced in embrittling environments.

Keywords

cleavage dimples fatigue flutes fractography hydrogen embrittlement intergranular fracture liquidmetal embrittlement stress-corrosion cracking striations 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    A. Phillips:An Introduction to Crystallography, 3rd ed., Longmans, 1963, and references therein.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fractography, Vol. 12,Metals Handbook, 9th ed., ASM International, 1987, and references therein.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    C.S. Smith:A History of Metallography, MIT Press, 1988, and references therein.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    J.E. Stead:The Crystalline Structure of Iron and Steel, Iron and Steel Inst., 1898, pp. 145–205.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    C.A. Zapffe and G.A. Moore: “A Micrographic Study of the Cleavage of Hydrogenized Ferrite,”Trans. AIME, 1943,154, pp. 335–359.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    C.A. Zapffe and M. Clogg, Jr.: “Fractography—A New Tool for Metallurgical Research,”Trans. ASM, 1945,34, pp. 71–107.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    D. Hull and P. Beardmore: “Velocity of Cleavage Cracks in Tungsten,”Int. J. Fract. Mech., 1966,2, pp. 468–87.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    C. Crussard, R. Borione, J. Plateau, Y. Morillon, and F. Maratray: “A Study of Impact Tests and the Mechanism of Brittle Fracture,”J. Iron Steel Inst., 1956,183, pp. 146–77.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    C.D. Beachem: “Microscopic Fracture Processes”,Fracture, An Advanced Treatise, Microscopic and Macroscopic Fundamentals, Vol. 1, H. Liebowitz, Ed., Academic Press, New York, 1968.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    G. Henry and J. Plateau:La Microfractographie, Editions Metaux, France, 1967.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    O.Yu. Kolesnychenko, R. de Kort, and H. van Kempen: “Atomically Flat Ultra-Clean Cr (001) Surfaces Produced by Cleavage of a Single Crystal: Scanning Tunneling Microscopy and Spectroscopy Study,”Surf. Sci., 2001,490, pp. L573–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    A.A. Griffith: “The Phenomena of Rupture and Flow in Solids,”Philos. Trans. R. Soc. (London) A, 1921,221, pp. 163–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    J. Reidle, P. Gumbsch, and H.F. Fishmeister: “Cleavage Anisotropy in Tungsten Single Crystals,”Phys. Rev. Lett., 1996,76, pp. 3594–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    J.F. Knott: “Micro-Mechanisms of Fracture and the Fracture Toughness of Engineering Alloys,”Fracture 1977, Vol. 1, D.M.R. Taplin, Ed., University of Waterloo Press, Canada, ICF4, 1977, pp. 61–92.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    P.W. Palmberg and H.L. Marcus: “An Auger Spectroscopic Analysis of the Extent of Grain Boundary Segregation,”Trans. ASM, 1969,62, pp. 1016–18.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    D.F. Stein, A. Joshi, and R.P. LaForce: “Studies Utilising Auger Electron Emission Spectroscopy on Temper Embrittlement in Low Alloy Steels,”Trans. ASM, 1969,62, pp. 776–83.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    C.L. Briant and S.K. Banerji: “Integranular Failure in Steel: The Role of Grain-Boundary Composition,”Int. Met. Rev., 1978,232 (No. 4), pp. 164–99.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    E.W. Hart: “Two-Dimensional Phase Transformations in Grain Boundaries,”Scr. Metall., 1968,2, pp. 179–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    S.P. Lynch and B.C. Muddle, and T. Pasang: “Mechanisms of Brittle Intergranular Fracture in Al−Li Alloys and Comparison with Other Alloys,”Philos. Mag. A., 2002,82, pp. 3361–73.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    R.H. Van Stone, T.B. Cox, J.R. Low, Jr., and J.A. Psioda: “Microstructural Aspects of Fracture by Dimpled Rupture,”Int. Met. Rev., 1985,30, pp. 157–78.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    D.A. Ryder and A.C. Smale: “A Metallographic Study of Tensile Fractures in Aluminium-Copper and Aluminum-Copper-Zinc-Magnesium Alloys,”Fracture of Solids, D.C. Drucker and J.J. Gilman, Ed., Interscience Pub., London, 1963, pp. 237–59.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    S.P. Lynch: “The Influence of Microstructure on the Fatigue and Tensile-Deformation and Fracture Characteristics of Aluminium-Zinc-Magnesium Alloys,” Ph.D. Thesis, University of Manchester, 1969.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    S.P. Lynch: “Ductile and Brittle Crack Growth: Fractography, Mechanisms and Criteria,”Mater. Forum, 1988,11, pp. 268–83.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    D.A. Meyn and E.J. Brooks: “Microstructural Origin of Flutes and Their Use in Distinguishing Striationless Fatigue from Stress-Corrosion Cracking in Titanium Alloys,”Fractography and Materials Science, STP 733, L.N. Gilbertson and R.D. Zipp, Ed., ASTM, 1981, pp. 5–31.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    J.C. Williams, R.R. Boyers and M.J. Blackburn: “The— Influence of Microstructure on the Fracture Topography of Titanium Alloys,”Electron Microfractography, STP 453, ASTM, 1969, pp. 215–35.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    J. Glynn: “On the Causes of Fracture of the Axles of Railway Carriages,”Minutes Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng., London, 1844,3, pp. 202–03.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    H.J. Gough:The Fatigue of Metals, Ernest Benn Ltd., London, 1926.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    R. Cazaud:Fatigue of Metals, 1948, Translated by A.J. Fenner, Chapman & Hall, Ltd., London, 1953.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    C.A. Zapffe and C.O. Worden: “Fractographic Registrations of Fatigue,”Trans. ASM, 1951,43, pp. 958–69.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    R. Crussard:Int. Conf. on Fatigue of Metals, Inst. of Mech. Eng., 1956, p. 748.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    P.J.E. Forsth: “The Application of ‘Fractography’ to Fatigue Failure Investigations,” Technical Note MET 257, Royal Aircaft Establishment, Farnborough, U.K., Mar 1957.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    D.A. Ryder: “Some quantitative Information Obtained from the Examination of Fatigue Fracture Surfaces,” Technical Note MET 288, Royal Aircraft Establishment, Farnborough, U.K., Sep 1958; see also P.J.E. Forsyth and D.A. Ryder: “Some Results Derived from the Microscopic Examination of Crack Surfaces,”Aices. Eng., 160, pp. 96–99.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    J.C. McMillan and R.M.N. Pelloux: “Fatigue Crack Propagation under Programmed and Random Load,”Fatigue Crack Propagation, STP 415, ASTM, 1967, pp. 505–35.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    D.A. Meyn: “Observations on Micromechanisms of Fatigue-Crack Propagation in 2024 Aluminium”,Trans. ASM, 1968,61, pp. 42–51.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    R.M.N. Pelloux: “Crack Extension by Alternating Shear,”Eng. Fract. Mech., 1970,1, pp. 697–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    G.C. Garrett and J.F. Knott: “Crystallographic Fatigue Crack Growth in Aluminium Alloys,Acta Metal., 1975,23, pp. 841–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    P. Rieux, J. Driver, and J. Rieu: “Fatigue Crack Propagation in Austenitic Stainless Steel Single Crystals,”Acta Metall., 1979,27, pp. 145–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    K.J. Nix and H.M. Flower: “The Micromechanisms of Fatigue Crack Growth in a Commerical Al−Zn−Mg−Cu Alloy,”Acta Metall., 1982,30, pp. 1549–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    D.L. Davidson and J. Lankford: “Fatigue Crack Growth in Metals and Alloys: Mechanisms and Micromechanisms,”Int. Mater. Rev., 1992,37, pp. 45–76.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    N.M. Grinberg: “Stage II Fatigue Crack Growth,”Int. J. Fatigue, 1984,6, pp. 229–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    J. Kiese, A. Gysler, and G. Lütjering: “Fatigue Crack Propagation Mechanisms in Al-Alloys under Variable Amplitude Loading,”Fatigue 90, H. Kitagawam and T. Tanaka, Ed., 1990, pp. 1523–28.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    F.O. Riemelmoser, R. Pippan, and H.P. Stüwe: “An Argument for a Cycle-by-Cycle Propagation of Fatigue Cracks at Small Stress Intensity Ranges,Acta Mater., 1998,46, pp. 1793–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    D. Broek: “Some Contributions of Electron Fractography to the Theory of Fracture,”Int. Metall. Rev., 1974,19, pp. 135–82.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    W.H. Johnson: “On the Remarkable Changes Produced in Iron and Steel by the Action of Hydrogen and Acids,”Proc. R. Soc. (London), 1874–1875,23, pp. 168–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    S.P. Lynch: “Environmentally Assisted Cracking: Overview of Evidence for an Adsorption-Induced Localised-Slip Process,”Acta Metall., 1988,36, pp. 2639–61, and reference therein.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    S.P. Lynch: “Metallographic Contributions to Understanding Mechanisms of Environmentally Assisted Cracking,”Metallography, 1989,23, pp. 147–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    A.R.C. Westwood, C.M. preece, and M.H. Kamdar: “Application of a Crack Propagation Criterion to LME: Clevage of Aluminum Monocrystals in Liquid Gallium,”Trans. ASM, 1967,60, pp. 211–13.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    C.A. Zapffe and C.E. Sims: “Hydrogen Embrittlement, Internal Stress and Defects in Steel,”Trans. AIME, 1941,145, pp. 225–61.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    A. Phillips, V. Kerlins, and B.V. Whiteson:Electron Fractography Handbook, MCIC-HB-8, Metals and Ceramics Info. Ctr., Columbus, OH, 1976; originally published as Report AFML-TR-64-416, Air Force Systems Command, Wright-Patterson AFB, OH, Jan 1965.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    A.R. Troiano: “The Role of Hydrogen and Other Interstitials in the Mechanical Behavior of Metals,”Trans. ASM, 1960,52, pp. 54–80.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    C.D. Beachem: “A New Model for Hydrogen Assisted Cracking (Hydrogen Embrittlement),”Metall. Trans., 1972,3, pp. 437–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    H.K. Birnbaum and P. Sofronis: “Hydrogen-enhanced Localised Plasticity— A Mechanism for Hydrogen-Related Fracture,”Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 1994,176, pp. 191–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    S.P. Lynch: “Mechanisms of Hydrogen Assisted Cracking— A Review,”Hydrogen Effects on Materials Behavior and Corrosion Deformation Interactions, N.R. Moody et al., Ed., TMS, 2003, pp. 449–66, and references therein.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    H. Vehoff and H.-K. Klameth: “Hydrogen Embrittlement and Trapping at Crack Tips in Ni-Single Crystals,”Acta Metall., 1985,33, pp. 955–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    X. Chen and W.W. Gerberich: “The Kinetics and Micromechanics of Hydrogen-Assisted Cracking in Fe-3 Pct Si Single Crystals,”Metall. Trans. A, 1991,22, pp. 59–70.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    S. Gahr, M.L. Grossbeck, and H.K. Birnbaum: “Hydrogen Embrittlement of Nb I—Microscopic Behaviour at Low Temperatures,”Acta Metall., 1977,25, pp. 125–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    H. Moore, S. Beckinsale, and C.E. Mallinson: “The Season Cracking of Brass and Other Copper Alloys,”J. Inst. Met., 1921,25, pp. 35–152.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    P.J.E. Forsyth and D.A. Ryder: “Some Results of Examination of Aluminium Alloy Specimen Fracture Surfaces,”Metallurgia, 1961,63, pp. 117–24.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    G.M. Scamans: “Evidence for Crack-Arrest Markings on Integranular Stress Corrosion Fracture Surfaces in Al−Zn−Mg Alloys,”Metall. Trans. A, 1980,11, pp. 846–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    N.A. Nielsen: “Electron Microfactography of Stress-Corrosion Cracking,”Fundamental Aspects of Stress Corrosion Cracking, R.W. Staehle, A.J. Forty, and D. Van Roogen, Ed., NACE, 1969, pp. 308–17.Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    J.C. Scully: “Fractographic Aspects of Stress Corrosion Cracking,“The Theory of Stress Corrosion Cracking in Alloys, J.C. Scully, Ed., North Atlantic Treaty Organization, Brussels, 1971, pp. 127–66.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    J.I. Dickson, L. Shiqiong, J.P. Bailon, and D. Tromans: “The Fractography of Transgranular SCC in FCC Metals: Mechanistic Implications,”Parkins Sympsium on Fundamental Aspects of Stress Corrosion Cracking, S.M. Bruemmer et al., Ed., The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society, 1992, pp. 303–22.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    “Corrosion-Deformation Interactions,”Second Int. Conf. on Corrosion-Deformation Interactions, T. Magnin, Ed., Institute of Material, Nice, France, 1996; see also “Hydrogen Effects on Materials Behavior and Corrosion Deformation Interactions,”Proceedings of the Int. Conf. on Hydrogen Effects on Material Behavior and Corrosion Deformation Interactions (Moran, WY), R.N. Moody, et al., Ed., TMS, 2003.Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    H. Uhlig: “New Perspectives in the Stress Corrosion Problem,”Physical Metallurgy of Stress Corrosion Fracture, T. Rhodin, Ed., Interscience Publ., New York, 1959, pp. 1–17.Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    H. Nichols and W. Rostoker: “Analogies between Stress-Corrosion Cracking and Embrittlement by Liquid Metals,”Trans. ASM, 1963,56, pp. 494–507.Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    B.P. Haigh: “Experiments on the Fatigue of Brasses,”J. Inst. Met., 1917,18, pp. 55–86.Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    P.J.E. Forsyth: “A Two Stage Process of Fatigue Crack Grwoth,”Proceedings of the Crack propagation Symposium, Vol. 1, Cranfield, 1961, pp. 76–94.Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    R.M.N. Pelloux: “Corrosion Fatigue Crack Propagation,”Fracture 1969, Proc. Second Int. Conf. on Fracture (Brighton), Chapman and Hall, London, 1969, pp. 731–44.Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    D.A. Meyn: “The Nature of Fatigue-Crack Propagation in Air and Vacuum for 2024 Aluminium,”Trans. ASM, 1968,61, pp. 52–61.Google Scholar

General Bibliography

  1. 71.
    A. Phillips, V. Kerlins, and B.V. Whiteson:Electron Fractography Handbook, MCIC-HB-8, Metals and Ceramics Info. Ctr., Columbus, OH, 1976; originally published as report AFML-TR-64-416, Air Force Systems Command, Wright-Patterson AFB, OH, Jan 1965.Google Scholar
  2. 71.
    Electron Fractography, STP 436, ASTM, 1968.Google Scholar
  3. 72.
    G. Henry and J. Plateau:La Microfractographie, Editions Metaux, France, 1968.Google Scholar
  4. 73.
    Electron Microfractography, STP 453, ASTM, 1969.Google Scholar
  5. 74.
    D.A. Ryder: “The Elements of Fractography,”Google Scholar
  6. 75.
    AGARD ograph 155, Advisory Group for Aerospace Research Development (AGARD), NATO, 1971.Google Scholar
  7. 76.
    C.D. Beachem and W.R. Warke, Ed.:Fractography—Microscopic Cracking Processes, STP 600, ASTM, 1976.Google Scholar
  8. 77.
    G. Henry and D. Horstmann: “De Ferri Metallographia V,”Fractography and Microfractography, Stahleisen Verlag, Düsseldorf, m.b.H., 1979 (in English, German, and French).Google Scholar
  9. 78.
    G. Zimmer, L.N. Gilbertson, and R.D. Zipp, Ed.:Fractography and Materials Sciences, STP 733, ASTM, 1981.Google Scholar
  10. 79.
    Fractography, Vol. 12,Metals Handbook, 9th ed., ASM International, 1987.Google Scholar
  11. 80.
    J.E. Masters and J.J. Au, Ed.:Fractography of Modern Engineering Materials: Composites and Metals, STP 948, ASTM, 1987.Google Scholar
  12. 81.
    D. Hull:Fractography—Observing, Measuring and Interpreting Fracture Surface Topography, Cambridge Univ. Press, 1999.Google Scholar
  13. 82.
    C.R. Brooks and A. Choudhury:Failure Analysis of Engineering Materials, McGraw-Hill, 2002.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© ASM International - The Materials Information Society 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Monash UniversityClaytonAustralia
  2. 2.DSTOFishermans BendAustralis. Moutsos

Personalised recommendations