Journal of Thermal Spray Technology

, Volume 15, Issue 4, pp 623–627 | Cite as

Biocompatible nanostructured high-velocity oxyfuel sprayed titania coating: Deposition, characterization, and mechanical properties

Reviewed Papers


Nanostructured titania (TiO2) coatings were produced by high-velocity oxyfuel (HVOF) spraying. They were engineered as a possible candidate to replace hydroxyapatite (HA) coatings produced by thermal spray on implants. The HVOF sprayed nanostructured titania coatings exhibited mechanical properties, such as hardness and bond strength, much superior to those of HA thermal spray coatings. In addition to these characteristics, the surface of the nanostructured coatings exhibited regions with nanotextured features originating from the semimolten nanostructured feedstock particles. It is hypothesized that these regions may enhance osteoblast adhesion on the coating by creating a better interaction with adhesion proteins, such as fibronectin, which exhibit dimensions in the order of nanometers. Preliminary osteoblast cell culture demonstrated that this type of HVOF sprayed nanostructured titania coating supported osteoblast cell growth and did not negatively affect cell viability.


biomedical coating bond strength hardness hydroxyapatite nanostructured TiO2 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    R. Vedantam and C. Ruddlesdin, The Fully Hydroxyapatite-Coated Total Hip Implant,J. Arthroplasty, 1996,11(5), p 534–542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    L.I. Havelin, B. Espehaug, and L.B. Engesaeter, The Performance of Two Hydroxyapatite-Coated Acetabular Cups Compared with Charnley Cups,J. Bone Joint Surg. Br., 2002,84-B(6), p 839–845CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    O. Reikeras and R.B. Gunderson, Failure of HA Coating on a Gritblasted Acetabular Cup,Acta Orthop. Scand., 2002,73(1), p 104–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    J. Blacha, High Osteolysis and Revision Rate with the Hydroxyapatite-Coated ABG Hip Prostheses,Acta Orthop. Scand., 2004,75(3), p 276–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    K.A. Lai, W.J. Shen, C.H. Chen, C.Y. Yang, W.P. Hu, and G.L. Chang, Failure of Hydroxyapatite-Coated Acetabular Cups,J. Bone Joint Surg. Br., 2002,84-B(5), p 641–646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    S. Overgaard, K. Soballe, K. Josephsen, E.S. Hansen, and C. Bunger, Role of Different Loading Conditions on Resorption of Hydroxyapatite Coating Evaluated by Histomorphometric and Stereological Methods,J. Orthop. Res., 1996,14, p 888–894CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    G.E. Kim, J. Walker Jr., and J.B. Williams Jr., “Nanostructured Titania Coated Titanium,” U.S. Patent 6,835,449, December 28, 2004Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    R.S. Lima, L. Leblanc, and B.R. Marple, Nanostructured and Conventional Titania Coatings for Abrasion and Slurry-Erosion Resistance (at 30° and 90°) Sprayed via APS, VPS and HVOF, pdf format (CD) in theProc. International Thermal Spray Conference 2005, DVS-Verlag GmbH, Düsseldorf, Germany, 2005Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    T.J. Webster, C. Ergun, R.H. Doremus, R.W. Siegel, and R. Bizios, Specific Proteins Mediate Enhanced Osteoblast Adhesion on Nanophase Ceramics,J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 2000,51(3), p 475–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    J.G. Legoux, F. Chellat, R.S. Lima, B.R. Marple, M.N. Bureau, H. Shen, G.A. Candeliere, Development of Osteoblast Colonies on New Bioactive Coatings,J. Therm. Spray Technol., 2006, 15(4), p 628–633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    “Standard Test Method for Adhesion or Cohesion Strength of Thermal Spray Coatings,”Annual Book of ASTM Standard, ASTM, Vol. 02.05, p 1–7Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    M.A. Lopes, F.J. Monteiro, and J.D. Santos, Glass-Reinforced Hydroxyapatite Composites: Fracture Toughness and Hardness Dependence on Microstructural Characteristics,Biomaterials, 1999,20, p 2085–2090CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    M. Espagnol, V. Guipont, K.A. Khor, M. Jeandin, and N. Llorca-Isern, Effect of Heat Treatment on High Pressure Plasma Sprayed Hydroxyapatite Coatings,Surf Eng., 2002,18(3), p 213–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Y.W. Gu, K.A. Khor, D. Pan, and P. Cheang, Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Plasma Sprayed HA/YSZ/Ti-6Al-4V Composite Coatings,Biomaterials, 2004,25, p 4009–4017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    R.S. Lima, K.A. Khor, H. Li, and B.R. Marple, HVOF Spraying of Nanostructured Hydroxyapatite for Biomedical Applications,Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2005,396, p 181–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    X. Zheng, M. Huang, and C. Ding, Bond Strength of Plasma-Sprayed Hydroxyapatite/Ti Composite Coatings,Biomaterials, 2000,21, p 841–849CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Y.C. Tsui, C. Doyle, and T.W. Clyne, Plasma Sprayed Hydroxyapatite Coatings on Titanium Substrates Part 1: Mechanical Properties and Residual Stress Levels,Biomaterials, 1998,19, p 2015–2029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    H. Li, K.A. Khor, and P. Cheang, Effect of the Powders’ Melting State on the Properties of HVOF Sprayed Hydroxyapatite Coatings,Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2000,293, p 71–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Y.C. Yang and E. Chang, The Bonding of Plasma-Sprayed Hydroxyapatite Coatings to Titanium: Effect of Processing, Porosity and Residual Stress,Thin Solid Films, 2003,444, p 260–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ASM International 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. S. Lima
    • 1
  • B. R. Marple
    • 1
  • H. Li
    • 2
  • K. A. Khor
    • 2
  1. 1.National Research Council of CanadaBouchervilleCanada
  2. 2.Nanyang Technological University School of Mechanical and Aerospace EngineeringSingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations