Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance

, Volume 14, Issue 5, pp 596–603

Strengthening materials specifications

  • K. Sampath
Processing

Abstract

Continuing efforts to strengthen materials specifications readily recognize that a mere compliance with a materials specification only assures a material meeting or exceeding the minimum expectations explicitly detailed in the specification. Implicitly, such efforts also recognize that additional and specific client needs must be addressed as supplementary requirements and introduced during material procurement to reduce risks and assure enhanced performance. This article describes two U.S. Navy-related case studies that allowed further strengthening of the materials specification process, using newer methods and renewed understanding. The first case demonstrates the use of a constraints-based modeling approach to specify the chemical composition of high-performance welding electrodes for critical U.S. Navy applications. This approach helps to distinguish high-performance welding electrode chemical compositions from rich and lean welding electrode chemical compositions that might limit the operational envelope, reduce performance, or both, while increasing overall cost of fabrication but otherwise meet electrode specification requirements. The second case identifies that the size of an ingot could be an important factor while specifying the aluminum and sulfur contents of very large-size, heavy-gauge plates. Renewed understanding of melt fluidity issues associated with the solidification of very large-size ingots shows that deficiencies in through-thickness ductility of heavy-gauge plates are related to controlling aluminum and sulfur contents of the voluminous melt, notwithstanding explicit compliance with specification requirements.

Keywords

aluminum and sulfur contents constraints-based modeling electrode specification heavy-gauge high-strength steel plates materials specification procurement specification welding electrodes 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    “Navy Ships: Lessons of Prior Programs May Reduce New Attack Submarine Cost Increases and Delays,” GAO Report to Congressional Requesters, GAO/NSIAD-95-4, U.S. General Accounting Office, Oct 1994, p 7Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    K. Sampath, Constraints-Based Modeling Enables Successful Development of a Welding Electrode Specification for Critical Navy Applications, Welding J., Vol 84 (August), 2005, p 131s-138sGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    “Electrodes and Rods: Welding, Bare, Solid, or Alloy Cored; and Fluxes, Low Alloy Steel,” MIL-E-23765/2E (SH), April 1994Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    “Specification for Low-Alloy Steel Electrodes and Rods for Gas Shielded Are Welding,” A5.28 American Welding Society, 2005Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    “Steel Plate, Alloy, Structural, High-Yield Strength (HY-80 and HY-100),” MIL-S-16216K (SH), June 1987Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    K. Sampath, Meeting Specification, Failing Expectations, Conf. Proc. Use of Bainitic and Bainitic-Martensitic Steels in Current or Developing Applications, Sept. 2004 (New Orleans, LA), MS&T, p 425–432Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    P.W. Holsberg and R.J. Wong, Welding of HSLA-100 for Naval Applications, in Weldability of Materials, R.A. Patterson and K.W. Mahin, Ed., ASM International, 1990, p 219–239Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    W. Steven and A.G. Haynes, The Temperature of Formation of Martensite and Bainite in Low-Alloy Steels, J. Iron Steel Inst., Vol 183 (No. 8), 1956, p 349–359Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    K.J. Irvine and F.B. Pickering, Low-Carbon Bainitic Steels, J. Iron Steel Inst., Vol 184 (No. 12), 1957, p 292–309Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    W.C. Leslie, The Physical Metallurgy of Steels, McGraw-Hill International Book Co., Kogakusha, Inc., Tokyo, Japan, 1981, p 201–205Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    N. Yurioka, H. Suzuki, S. Ohshita, and S. Saito, Determination of Necessary Preheating Temperature in Steel Welding, Welding J., Vol 62 (No. 6), 1983, p 147s-153sGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    R.J. Wong and M.D. Hayes, The Metallurgy, Welding and Qualification of Microalloyed (HSLA) Steel Weldments, American Welding Society, 1990, p 450–489Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    K. Sampath, R.S. Green, D.A. Civis, H. Dong, and P.J. Konkol, Evaluation of New High-Performance Electrodes for GMA Welding of HSLA-100 Steel, in High Performance Structural Steels, R. Asfahani, Ed., ASM International, 1995, p 179–188Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    P. Jhaveri, W.G. Moffatt, and C.M. Adams, Jr., The Effect of Plate Thickness and Radiation on Heat Flow in Welding and Cutting, Welding J., Vol 41 (No. 1), 1962, p 12s-16sGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Heavy-Gauge Steel Plate Manufacturer’s Report, June 27, 1983, on Testing for Waiver of First Article Inspection Clause in MIL-S-16216J (SH), April 10, 1981, including Amendment 1, August 16, 1982Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    “NCEMT TR 00-69,” Concurrent Technologies Corporation, Johnstown, PA, 2000Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    R.W. Heine, C.R. Loper, and P.C. Rosenthal, Principles of Metal Casting, Tata McGraw-Hill Publishing Co., New Delhi, India, 1976, p 414Google Scholar

Copyright information

© ASM International 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. Sampath
    • 1
  1. 1.Kreative KonceptsJohnstown

Personalised recommendations