Development of expert systems for the design of a hot-forging process based on material workability
- 210 Downloads
Most of the time (and cost) involved in planning hot forging process is related to activities strongly dependent on human expertise, intuition, and creativity, and also to iterative procedure involving extensive experimental work. In this paper, the development of an expert system for forging process design, which emphasizes materials’ workability, is discussed. Details of the forging process design expert system, its basic modules, design and implementation details, and deliverables are explained. The system uses the vast database available on the hot workability of more than 200 technologically important materials and the knowledge acquired from a materials’ expert. The C Language Integrated Production System (CLIPS) has been adopted to develop this expert system. The expert system can address three types of functions, namely, forging process design, materials information system, and forging defect analysis. The expert system will aid and prompt a novice engineer in designing a forging process by providing accurate information of the process parameters, lubricants, type of machine, die material, and type of process (isothermal versus non-isothermal) for a given material with a known specification or code and prior history.
KeywordsC Language Integrated Production System (CLIPS) hot forging process materials workability
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.M.L. Farinacci, M.S. Fox, I. Hulthage, and M.D. Rychener: “Development of ALADIN, an Expert System for Aluminum Alloy Design,” Tech. Report CMU-RI-TR-86-05, Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, January, 1986.Google Scholar
- 2.G.L. Lovegrove, G.J. Curtis, and R.A. Farrar: “Welding Advisory System for Process Selection (WASPS),” Intl. Conference on Industrial and Engineering Applications of AI and Expert Systems, 1989, ACM Press, NY.Google Scholar
- 5.M. Bahkshi-Jooybari, I. Pillinger, T.A. Dean, and P. Hartley: “Application of Product and Process Comparison Criteria in an Intelligent Knowledge-Based System for Forging Die Design” in American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Petroleum Division (Publication) PD, ASME, New York, NY, 1996, Vol. 75, No. 3, pp. 151–58.Google Scholar
- 6.F. Hayes-Roth: “Artificial Intelligence What Works and What Doesn’t?” American Association for Artificial Intelligence, Melona Park, CA, 1997, pp. 99–113.Google Scholar
- 7.Y.V.R.K. Prasad and S. Sasidhara, Hot Working Guide, A Compendium of Processing Maps, ASM International, Materials Park, OH, 1997.Google Scholar
- 8.B.G. Buchanan, D. Barstow, R. Bechtel, J. Bennet, W. Clancey, C. Kulikowski, T.M. Mitchell, and D.A. Waterman: “Constructing an Expert System” in Building Expert Systems, F. Hayes-Roth, D.A. Waterman, and D. Levat, eds., Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1983, Chap. 5.Google Scholar
- 9.L. Eshelman: “MOLE: A Knowledge-Acquisition Tool for Cover and Differentiate Systems” in Automating Knowledge Acquisition for Expert Systems, S. Marcus, ed., Kluwer, Boston, MA, 1988.Google Scholar
- 11.T.M. Mitchell: “Version Spaces: An Approach to Concept Learning,” Ph.D. Thesis, Stanford University, CA, 1978.Google Scholar
- 12.Soo-ik-oh, T. Alton and H.L. Gegel, Metal Forming Fundamentals and Applications, ASM, Metals Park, OH, 1983.Google Scholar
- 13.http://www.jsc.nasa.gov/∼clips/CLIPS.htmlGoogle Scholar
- 14.http://www.ghg.net/clips/download/documentation/Google Scholar