Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The effect of attention to distractor on inhibitory processes in selective attention

  • Articles
  • Published:
Chinese Science Bulletin

Abstract

Selective attention has been viewed as a dualprocess mechanism, that is, exciting targets and inhibiting distractors. Most early studies concentrated mainly on the target-excitation, whereas recent investigations began to pay more attention to the inhibitory selective attention mechanism. A measure named negative priming (NP) was extensively employed to probe into the inhibitory processes. The Houghton and Tipper Model put forward a notion: the inhibition that feeds back to the distractor is reactive. That means, the level of inhibition is determined by the activation state of the distractor. Distractors that are more salient and intrude into the control of action receive greater inhibitory feedbacks than less salient distractors. Because increasing attention to an object would enhance the early processing of this object, we thus hypothesized that augmenting the level of attention to a distractor might lead to a higher level of inhibition, revealed as a corresponding augmentation in the magnitude of NP effect. To test this assumption, an objectbased identification task was then applied, and participants were asked to make the animate/inanimate categorization. Attention level was manipulated by varying the relative spatial locations of target and distractor (overlapped or separated). A reliable greater NP effect was found in the overlapped than separated condition, indicating that distractors under the high-level attention condition (overlapped) got greater initial excitation, and then evoked greater subsequent inhibitory feedbacks, therefore resulting in a larger NP effect. These results provide direct evidence for the reactive inhibition suggested by the Houghton and Tipper model. Meanwhile a coincident greater positive priming (PP) effect was obtained under the overlapped than separated condition, which could be attributed to the higher level of target activation in the overlapped condition. The covariation of NP and PP effects further confirmed that the way of our manipulation on attention level in this study was valid.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Muller-Gass, A., Campbell, K., Event-related potential measures of the inhibition of information processing: I. Selective attention in the waking state, International Journal of Psychophysiology, 2002, 46: 177–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Slotnick, S. D., Schwarzbach, J., Yantis, S., Attentional inhibition of visual processing in human striate and extrastriate cortex, Neurolmage, 2003, 19: 1602–1611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Marí-Beffa, P., Hayes, A. E., Machado, L. et al., Lack of inhibition in Parkinson’s disease: Evidence from a lexical decision task, Neuropsychologia, 2005, 43: 638–646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Amso, D., Johnson, S. P., Selection and inhibition in infancy: Evidence from the spatial negative priming paradigm, Cognition, 2005, 95: B27-B36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Tipper, S. P., Driver, J., Negative priming between pictures and words in a selective attention task: Evidence for semantic processing of ignored stimuli, Memory and Cognition, 1988, 16(1): 64–70.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Houghton, G., Tipper, S. P., Inhibitory mechanisms of neural and cognitive control: Applications to selective attention and sequential action, Brain and Cognition, 1996, 30: 20–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tipper, S. P., Does negative priming reflect inhibitory mechanisms? A review and integration of conflicting views, The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 2001, 54A(2): 321–343.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Houghton, G., Tipper, S. P., Weaver, B. et al., Inhibition and interference in selective attention: Some tests of a neural network model, Visual Cognition, 1996, 3(2): 119–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Neill, W. T., Valdes, L. A., Persistence of negative priming: steady state or decay, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 1992, 18(3): 565–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Neill, W. T., Persistence of negative priming: II. Evidence for episodic trace retrieval, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 1992, 18(5), 993–1000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Neill, W. T., Episodic retrieval in negative priming and repetition priming, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 1997, 23(6): 1291–1305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kane, M. J., May, C. P., Hasher, L. et al., Dual Mechanisms of Negative Priming, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1997, 23(3): 632–650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Park, J., Kanwisher, N., Negative priming for spatial locations: Identity mismatching, not distractor inhibition, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1994, 20(3): 613–623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Li, L., New views on the mechanism of negative priming, Psychological Science, 2001, 24(3): 330–333.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Yantis, S., Goal-directed and stimulus-driven determinants of attentional control. in Control of Cognitive Processes: Attention and Performance X VIII(eds. Monsell, S., Driver, J.), Cambridge: MIT Press, 2000, 73–103.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Metzler, C., Parkin, A. J., Reversed negative priming following frontal lobe lesions, Neuropsychologia, 2000, 38: 363–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Dimitrov, M., Nakic, M., Elpern-Waxman, J., Inhibitory attentional control in patients with frontal lobe damage, Brain and Cognition, 2003, 52: 258–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Park, S., Püschel, J., Sauter, B. H. et al., Spatial selective attention and inhibition in Schizophrenia patients during acute psychosis and at 4-month follow-up, Biological Psychiatry, 2002, 51: 498–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Fox, E., Fockert, J. W., Negative priming depends on prime-probe similarity: Evidence for episodic retrieval, Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 1998, 5: 107–113.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Stolz, J. A., Healy, D., Taking a bright view of negative priming in the light of dim stimuli: Further evidence for memory confusion during episodic retrieval, Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 2001, 55(3): 219–230.

    Google Scholar 

  21. MacDonald, P. A., Joordens, S., Seergobin, K. N., Negative priming effects that are bigger than a breadbox: Attending to distractors does not eliminate negative priming but rather enhances it, Memory and Cognition, 1999, 27: 197–207.

    Google Scholar 

  22. MacDonald, P. A., Joordens, S., Investigating a memory-based account of negative priming: Support for selection-feature mismatch, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2000, 26(4): 1478–1496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Facoetti, A., Molteni, M., Is attentional focusing an inhibitory process at distractor location? Cognitive Brain Research, 2000, 10: 185–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Gao, W. B., Wei, J. H., Peng, X. H. et al., Brain dynamic mechanisms on the visual attention scale with Chinese characters cues, Chinese Science Bulletin, 2002, 47(14): 1074–1078.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Gao, W. B., Wei, J. H., Peng, X. H. et al., The adjust mechanism of visual spatial attention scale on P2, Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2004, 36(2): 139–144.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Cutzu, F., Tsotsos, J. K., The selective tuning model of attention: Psychophysical evidence for a suppressive annulus around an attended item, Vision Research, 2003, 43: 205–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Müller, N. G., Mollenhauer, M., Rösler, A. et al., The attentional field has a Mexican hat distribution, Vision Research, 2005, 45: 1129–1137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Orteils, J. J., Abad, M. J. F., Noguera, C. et al., Influence of prime-probe stimulus onset asynchrony and prime precuing manipulations on semantic priming effects with words in a lexical-decision task, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2001, 27(1): 75–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Tipper, S. P., Meegan, D., Howard, L. A., Action-centred negative priming: Evidence for reactive inhibition, Visual Cognition, 2002, 9(4/5): 591–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Stablum, F., Ricci, R., Pavese, A. et al., Global / local processing and negative priming: The influence of selection difficulty and stimulus exposure, Psychological Research, 2001, 65: 81–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Hibi, Y., Takeda, Y., Yagi, A., Attention level and negative priming in hierarchical patterns, Japanese Psychological Research, 2002, 44(4): 241–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Orteils, J. J., Tudela, P., Positive and negative semantic priming of attended and unattended parafoveal words in a lexical decision task, Acta Psychologica, 1996, 94: 209–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Peking University, 100871, Beijing, China

    Haiyan Geng, Qianlan Song & Ying Zhu

  2. Department of psychology, Purdue university, 47906, West Lafayette, IN, USA

    Yunfeng Li

Authors
  1. Haiyan Geng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Qianlan Song
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yunfeng Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ying Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Haiyan Geng.

About this article

Cite this article

Geng, H., Song, Q., Li, Y. et al. The effect of attention to distractor on inhibitory processes in selective attention. Chin.Sci.Bull. 50, 1743–1750 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1360/982005-516

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1360/982005-516

Keywords

Search

Navigation