The quantity-Quality trade-Off of children In a developing country: Identification using chinese twins

Abstract

Testing the trade-off between child quantity and quality within a family is complicated by the endogeneity of family size. Using data from the Chinese Population Census, we examine the effect of family size on child educational attainment in China. We find a negative correlation between family size and child outcome, even after we control for the birth order effect. We then instrument family size by the exogenous variation that is induced by a twin birth and find a negative effect of family size on children’s education. We also find that the effect of family size is more evident in rural China, where the public education system is poor. Given that our estimates of the effect of having twins on nontwins at least provide the lower bound of the true effect of family size, these findings suggest a quantity-quality trade-off for children in developing countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Ahn, N. 1994. “Effects of the One-Child Policy on Second and Third Births in Hebei, Shaanxi and Shanghai.” Journal of Population Economics 7:63–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Anh, T.S., J. Knodel, D. Lam, and J. Friedman. 1998. “Family Size and Children’s Education in Vietnam.” Demography 35:57–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Alderman, H., J. Behrman, V. Lavy, and R. Menon. 2001. “Child Health and School Enrollment: A Longitudinal Analysis.” Journal of Human Resources 36(1):185–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Angrist, J. and W. Evans. 1998. “Children and Their Parent’s Labor Supply: Evidence From Exogenous Variation in Family Size.” American Economic Review 88:450–77.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Angrist, J., V. Lavy, and A. Schlosser. 2005. “New Evidence on the Causal Link Between the Quantity and Quality of Children.” NBER Working Paper 11835. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Banister, J. 1987. China’s Changing Population. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Becker, G.S. 1960. “An Economic Analysis of Fertility.” Pp. 135–87 in Demographic and Economic Change in Developed Countries, edited by G.S. Becker. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  8. —.1991. A Treatise on the Family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Becker, G.S. and H.G. Lewis. 1973. “On the Interaction Between the Quantity and Quality of Children.” Journal of Political Economy 81(2):S279-S288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Becker, G.S. and N. Tomes. 1976. “Child Endowments and the Quantity and Quality of Children.” Journal of Political Economy 84(4):S143-S162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Behrman, J.R. and M.R. Rosenzweig. 2004. “Returns to Birthweight.” Review of Economics and Statistics 86:586–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Behrman, J.R., M.R. Rosenzweig, and P. Taubman. 1994. “Endowments and the Allocation of Schooling in the Family and in the Marriage Market: The Twins Experiment.” Journal of Political Economy 102:1131–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Behrman, J.R. and P. Taubman. 1986. “Birth Order, Schooling, and Earnings.” Journal of Labor Economics 4:121–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Black, S.E., P.J. Devereux, and K.G. Salvanes. 2005. “The More the Merrier? The Effect of Family Size and Birth Order on Children’s Education.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 120:669–700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Blake, J. 1981. “Family Size and the Quality of Children.” Demography 18:421–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. —. 1989. Family Size and Achievement. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Broaded, M.C. and C. Liu. 1996. “Family Background, Gender and Educational Attainment in Urban China.” The China Quarterly 145:53–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bronars, S.G. and J. Grogger. 1994. “The Economic Consequences of Unwed Motherhood: Using Twin Births as a Natural Experiment.” American Economic Review 84:1141–56.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Brown, P.H. and A. Park. 2002. “Education and Poverty in Rural China.” Economics of Education Review 21:523–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Browning, M. 1992. “Children and Household Economic Behavior.” Journal of Economic Literature 30:1434–75.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Chow, G.C. 2002. “China’s Population Problems and Policy.” Unpublished document. Department of Economics, Princeton University.

  22. Conley, D. 2004a. The Pecking Order: Which Siblings Succeed and Why. New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Conley, D. 2004b. “What Is the ’True‘ Effect of Sibship Size and Birth Order on Education? Instrumental Variable Estimates From Exogenous Variation in Fertility.” Unpublished document. Center for Advanced Social Science Research, New York University.

  24. Connelly, R. and Z. Zheng. 2003. “Determinants of School Enrollment and Completion of 10 to 18 Year Olds in China.” Economics of Education Review 22:379–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Dasgupta, P. 1995. “The Population Problem: Theory and Evidence.” Journal of Economic Literature 33:1879–902.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Glewwe, P.W. and H. Jacoby. 1995. “An Economic Analysis of Delayed Primary School Enrolment in a Low Income Country: The Role of Early Childhood Nutrition.” Review of Economics and Statistics 77:156–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Glewwe, P.W., H. Jacoby, and E. King. 2001. “Early Childhood Nutrition and Academic Achievement: A Longitudinal Analysis.” Journal of Public Economics 81:345–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Hannum, E. 1999. “Political Change and the Urban-Rural Gap in Basic Education in China.” Comparative Education Review 43:193–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. —. 2002. “Ethnic Differences in Basic Education in Reform-Era Rural China.” Demography 39:95–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. —. 2003. “Poverty and Basic Education in Rural China: Villages, Households, and Girls’ and Boys’ Enrollment.” Comparative Education Review 47(2):141–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Hanushek, E.A. 1992. “The Trade-off Between Child Quantity and Quality.” Journal of Political Economy 100(1):84–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Hauser, R.M. and W.H. Sewell. 1985. “Birth Order and Educational Attainment in Full Sibships.” American Educational Research Journal 22:1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Haveman, R. and B. Wolfe. 1995. “The Determinants of Children’s Attainments: A Review of Methods and Findings.” Journal of Economic Literature 33:1829–78.

    Google Scholar 

  34. He, D., ed. 1996. Education in Contemporary China (in Chinese). Beijing: Contemporary China Press.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Jacobsen, J.P., J.W. Pearce III, and J.L. Rosenbloom. 2001. “The Effects of Child-Bearing on Women’s Marital Status: Using Twin Births As a Natural Experiment.” Economics Letters 70:133–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Johnson, D.G. 1994. “Effects of Institutions and Policies on Rural Population Growth With Application to China.” Population and Development Review 20:503–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Karmaus, W. and C. Botezan. 2002. “Does a Higher Number of Siblings Protect Against the Development of Allergy and Asthma? A Review.” Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 56:209–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. King, E.M. 1987. “The Effect of Family Size on Family Welfare: What Do We Know?” Pp. 373–411 in Population Growth and Economic Development: Issues and Evidence, edited by D.G. Johnson and R.D. Lee. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Knight, J. and S. Li. 1993. “The Determinants of Educational Attainment in China.” Pp. 285–330 in The Distribution of Income in China, edited by K. Griffin and R. Zhao. London: Macmillan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  40. —. 1996. “Educational Attainment and Rural-Urban Divide in China.” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 58(1):83–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Knodel, J., N. Havanon, and W. Sittitrai. 1990. “Family Size and the Education of Children in the Context of Rapid Fertility Decline.” Population and Development Review 16(1):31–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Knodel, J. and M. Wongsith. 1991. “Family Size and Children’s Education in Thailand: Evidence From a National Sample.” Demography 28:119–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Koo, H.P. and B.K. Janowitz. 1983. “Interrelationships Between Fertility and Marital Dissolution: Results of a Simultaneous Logit Model.” Demography 20:129–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Lee, J. 2004. “Sibling Size and Investment in Children’s Education: An Asian Instrument.” IZA Discussing Paper. Institute for the Study of Labor, Bonn, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Li, H. and J. Zhang. 2004. “Fines, Limited Liability and Fertility.” Unpublished document. Department of Economics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong.

  46. —. 2007. “Do High Birth Rates Hamper Economic Growth?” Review of Economics and Statistics 89:110–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Qian, N. 2005. “Quantity-Quality: The Positive Effect of Family Size on School Enrolment in China.” Working paper. Department of Economics, Brown University.

  48. Qian, Z. 1997. “Progression to Second Birth in China: A Study of Four Rural Counties.” Population Studies 51:221–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Ray, D. 1998. Development Economics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Rosenzweig, M.R. and K.I. Wolpin. 1980a. “Life-Cycle Labor Supply and Fertility: Causal Inferences From Household Models.” Journal of Political Economics 88:328–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. —.1980b. “Testing the Quantity-Quality Fertility Model: The Use of Twins as a Natural Experiment.” Econometrica 48(1):227–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. —. 2000. “Natural ‘Natural Experiments’ in Economics.” Journal of Economic Literature 38:827–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Rosenzweig, M.R. and J. Zhang. 2006. “Do Population Control Policies Induce More Human Capital Investment? Twins, Birthweight, and China’s ‘One Child’ Policy.” IZA Discussion Paper No. 2082. Institute for the Study of Labor, Bonn, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Sudha, S. 1997. “Family Size, Sex Composition and Children’s Education: Ethnic Differentials Over Development in Peninsular Malaysia.” Population Studies 51:139–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Tsui, M. and L. Rich. 2002. “The Only Child and Educational Opportunity for Girls in Urban China.” Gender and Society 16(1):74–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Willis, R. 1973. “A New Approach to the Economic Theory of Fertility Behavior.” Journal of Political Economy 81(2):S14-S64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Zhang, J. and B. Spencer. 1992. “Who Signs China’s One-Child Certificate, and Why?” Journal of Population Economics 5:203–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Junsen Zhang.

Additional information

We thank Suzanne Bianchi, Kenneth Hill, and two anonymous referees for valuable comments. Hongbin Li thanks the Hong Kong Research Grant Council (CUHK 4663/06H) and the Center for China in the World Economy at Tsinghua University for nancial support. Junsen Zhang thanks the Hong Kong Research Grant Council (CUHK 4667/06H) and the NIH (RO1 HD046144-01) for financial support. Any errors are the responsibility of the authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Li, H., Zhang, J. & Zhu, Y. The quantity-Quality trade-Off of children In a developing country: Identification using chinese twins. Demography 45, 223–243 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1353/dem.2008.0006

Download citation

Keywords

  • Ordinary Little Square
  • Family Size
  • Birth Order
  • Junior High School
  • Urban Sample