Demography

, Volume 44, Issue 3, pp 583–601 | Cite as

Multipartnered fertility among American men

  • Karen Benjamin Guzzo
  • Frank F. Furstenberg

Abstract

Using the 2002 (Cycle 6) National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG), which was the first NSFG to interview men, we document the prevalence and correlates of sequential parenthood with different partners (multipartnered fertility) among a representative sample of American men. Nearly 8% of American men aged 15–44 report having had children with more than one partner, with sharp differences by age, race/ethnicity, and income—over one-third of poor black men aged 35–44 report having had children with two or more mothers, and 16% report children with three or more mothers. Fathers of two or more children by multiple partners appear to be more disadvantaged than fathers with two or more children by the same partner. Multipartnered fertility is strongly related to prior birth characteristics; men not in a coresidential union at the preceding birth are more likely to have their next birth with a new partner, and controlling for prior-birth characteristics accounts for the elevated risk of Hispanics and blacks in baseline models. Results also suggest that multipartnered fertility is becoming more prevalent as younger cohorts transition to a new-partner birth more quickly and at a higher rate than older cohorts.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bachrach, C. 1987. “Cohabitation and Reproductive Behavior in the U.S.” Demography 24:623–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bachu, A. 1996. “Fertility of American Men.” Population Division Working Paper No. 14. U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  3. Becker, G.S., E.M. Landes, and R.T. Michael. 1977. “An Economic Analysis of Marital Instability.” Journal of Political Economy 85:1141–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bernhardt, E.M. and F.K. Goldscheider. 1998. “Who Lives in a Family? The Determinants of Union and Parental Status in Sweden and the United States.” PSTC Working Paper No. 98-0. Population Studies and Training Center, Brown University, Providence, RI.Google Scholar
  5. Bumpass, L.L. and H.-H. Lu. 2000. “Trends in Cohabitation and Implications for Children’s Family Contexts in the United States.” Population Studies 54:29–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cancian, M. and D.R. Meyer. 1998. “Who Gets Custody?” Demography 35:147–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carlson, M.J. and F.F. Furstenberg, Jr. 2006. “The Prevalence and Correlates of Multipartnered Fertility and Urban U.S. Parents.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 68:718–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cherlin, A. 1992. Marriage, Divorce, Remarriage. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Clarkberg, M. 1999. “The Price of Partnering: The Role of Economic Well-being in Young Adults’ First Union Experiences.” Social Forces 77:945–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clarkberg, M., R.M. Stolzenberg, and L.J. Waite. 1995. “Attitudes, Values, and Entrance Into Cohabitational vs. Marital Unions.” Social Forces 74:609–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Edin, K. and M. Kefalas. 2005. Promises I Can Keep: Why Poor Women Put Motherhood Before Marriage. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  12. Eggebeen, D.J. 2002. “The Changing Course of Fatherhood: Men’s Experiences With Children in Demographic Perspective.” Journal of Family Issues 23:486–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Eggebeen, D.J. and C. Knoester. 2001. “Does Fatherhood Matter for Men?” Journal of Marriage and the Family 63:381–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Forste, R. 2002. “Where Are All the Men? A Conceptual Analysis of the Role of Men in Family Formation.” Journal of Family Issues 23:579–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Furstenberg, F.F. Jr. 1995. “Fathering in the Inner City: Paternal Participation and Public Policy.” Pp. 119–47 in Fatherhood: Contemporary Theory, Research, and Social Policy, edited by W. Marsiglio. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  16. Furstenberg, F.F. Jr. and A. Cherlin. 1991. Divided Families: What Happens to Children When Parents Part. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Furstenberg, F.F. Jr., C.W. Nord, J.L. Peterson, and N. Zill. 1983. “The Life Course of Children of Divorce: Marital Disruption and Parental Contact.” American Sociological Review 48:656–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ganong, L.H. and M. Coleman. 1988. “Do Mutual Children Cement Bonds in Stepfamilies?” Journal of Marriage and the Family 50:687–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Grall, T. 2006. “Custodial Mothers and Fathers and Their Child Support: 2003.” U.S. Department of Commerce, Economics and Statistics Administration. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.Google Scholar
  20. Greene, M.E. and A.E. Biddlecom. 2000. “Absent and Problematic Men: Demographic Accounts of Male Reproductive Roles.” Population and Development Review 26:81–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Groves, R.M., G. Benson, W.D. Mosher, J. Rosenbaum, P. Granda, W. Axinn, J. Lepkowski, and A. Chandra. 2006. “Plan and Operation of Cycle 6 of the National Survey of Family Growth.” National Vital Health Statistics, Series 1, No. 42. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.Google Scholar
  22. Guzzo, K.B. and F.F. Furstenberg, Jr. 2007. “Multipartnered Fertility Among Young Women With a Nonmarital First Birth: Prevalence and Risk Factors.” Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health 39:29–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hamilton, B.E., S.J. Ventura, J.A. Martin, and P.D. Sutton. 2005. “Preliminary Births for 2004: Infant and Maternal Health.” Report. National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, MD. Available online at http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/pubs/pubd/hestats/prelimbirths04/prelimbirths04health. htmGoogle Scholar
  24. Harknett, K. and S.S. McLanahan. 2005. “Racial and Ethnic Differences in Marriage After the Birth of a Child.” American Sociological Review 69:790–811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hernandez, D.J. and P.D. Brandon. 2002. “Who Are the Fathers of Today?” Pp. 33–62 in Handbook of Father Involvement: Multidisciplinary Perspectives, edited by C.S. Tamis-LeMonda and N. Cabrera. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  26. Holzer, H.J., P. Offner, and E. Sorenson. 2005. “Declining Employment Among Young Black Less-Educated Men: The Role of Incarceration and Child Support.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 24:329–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lampard, R. and K. Peggs. 1999. “Repartnering: The Relevance of Parenthood and Gender to Cohabitation and Remarriage Among the Formerly Married.” British Journal of Sociology 50:443–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Landry, D.J. and J. Darroch Forrest. 1995. “How Old are U.S. Fathers?” Family Planning Perspectives 27:159–61, 165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lerman, R.I. 1993. “A National Profile of Young Unwed Father.” Pp. 26–51 in Young Unwed Father: Changing Roles and Emerging Policies, edited by R.I. Lerman and T.J. Ooms. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Manning, W.D. and P.J. Smock. 1999. “New Families and Nonresident Father-Child Visitation.” Social Forces 78:87–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. —. 2000. “‘Swapping Families:’ Serial Parenting and Economic Support for Children.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 62:111–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Martin, J.A., B.E. Hamilton, P.D. Sutton, S.J. Ventura, F. Menacker, and M.L. Munson. 2005. “Births: Final Data for 2003.” National Vital Statistics Reports, Series 54, No. 2. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.Google Scholar
  33. Martinez, G.M., A. Chandra, J.C. Abma, J. Jones, and W.D. Mosher. 2006. “Fertility, Contraception, and Fatherhood: Data on Men and Women From Cycle 6 of the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth.” National Vital and Health Statistics, Series 23, No. 6. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.Google Scholar
  34. McLanahan, S. and G. Sandefur. 1994. Growing Up With a Single Parent: What Helps, What Hurts. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Meyer, D.R., M. Cancian, and S. Cook. 2005. “Multiple Partner Fertility: Incidence and Implications for Child Support Policy.” Social Service Review 79:577–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mincy, R.B. 2002. “Who Should Marry Whom? Multipartnered Fertility Among New Parents.” Working Paper 02-03-FF. Center for Research on Child Wellbeing, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
  37. Mincy, R.B. and C.-C. Huang. 2001. “‘Just Get Me to the Church’: Assessing Policies to Promote Marriage Among Fragile Families.” Working Paper 02-02-FF. Center for Research on Child Wellbeing, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
  38. Mincy, R. B. and C.-C. Huang. 2002. “The ‘M’ Word: The Rise and Fall of Interracial Coalitions on Fathers and Welfare Reform.” Paper presented at a conference on Welfare Reform and Child Well-being, Bowling Green State University, March 1.Google Scholar
  39. Nelson, T.J. 2004. “Low-Income Fathers.” Annual Review of Sociology 30:427–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Raley, R.K. 2001. “Increasing Fertility in Cohabiting Unions: Evidence for the Second Demographic Transition?” Demography 38:59–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rao, K.V. and A. DeMaris. 1995. “Coital Frequency Among Married and Cohabiting Couples in the United States.” Journal of Biosocial Science 27:135–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rendall, M.S., L. Clarke, H.E. Peters, N. Ranjit, and G. Verropoulou. 1999. “Incomplete Reporting of Men’s Fertility in the United States and Britain.” Demography 36:135–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sans-Abiodun, P. and L.A. Sanchez. 2003. “‘Other Than the Drug Problem, He Is a Good Father’: Barriers to Healthy Marriage and Parenting Among Poor, Urban Black Men.” Center for Family and Demographic Research Working Paper 03-08. Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, OH.Google Scholar
  44. Seltzer, J.A. 1991. “Relationship Between Fathers and Children Who Live Apart: The Father’s Role After Separation.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 53:79–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sorensen, E. and C. Zibman. 2001. “Getting to Know Poor Fathers Who Do Not Pay Child Support.” Social Service Review 75:420–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Stewart, S.D. 2002. “The Effect of Stepchildren on Childbearing and Intentions and Births.” Demography 39:181–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Stewart, S.D., W.D. Manning, and P.J. Smock. 2003. “Union Formation Among Men in the U.S.: Does Having Prior Children Matter?” Journal of Marriage and the Family 65:90–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sweeney, M.M. 1997. “Remarriage of Women and Men After Divorce.” Journal of Family Issues 18:479–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. —. 2002. “Remarriage and the Nature of Divorce: Does it Matter Which Spouse Chose to Leave?” Journal of Family Issues 23:410–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. U.S. Census Bureau. 2005a. “Table MS-1. Marital Status of the Population 15 Years Old and Over, by Sex and Race: 1950 to Present.” Available online at http://www.census.gov/population/socdemo/ hh-fam/ms2.pdfGoogle Scholar
  51. U.S. Census Bureau. 2005b. “Table MS-2. Estimated Median Age at First Marriage, by Sex: 1890 to the Present.” Available online at http://www.census.gov/population/socdemo/hh-fam/ms1.pdfGoogle Scholar
  52. Ventura, S.J. and C.A. Bachrach. 2000. “Nonmarital Childbearing in the United States, 1940–99.” National Vital Statistics Reports, Series 48, No. 16. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.Google Scholar
  53. Waller, M.R. 2002. My Baby’s Father: Unmarried Parents and Paternal Responsibility. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Waller, M.R. and S. McLanahan. 2005. “‘His’ and ‘Her’ Marriage Expectations: Determinants and Consequences.” Journal of Marriage and Family 67:53–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Karen Benjamin Guzzo
    • 1
  • Frank F. Furstenberg
    • 2
  1. 1.Population Studies CenterUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphia
  2. 2.Sociology DepartmentUniversity of PennsylvaniaUSA

Personalised recommendations