Skip to main content
Log in

How do marital status, work effort, and wage rates interact?

  • Published:
Demography

Abstract

How marital status interacts with men’s earnings is an important analytic and policy issue, especially in the context of debates in the United States over programs that encourage healthy marriage. This paper generates new findings about the earnings-marriage relationship by estimating the linkages among flows into and out of marriage, work effort, and wage rates. The estimates are based on National Longitudinal Survey of Youth panel data, covering 23 years of marital and labor market outcomes, and control for unobserved heterogeneity. We estimate marriage effects on hours worked (our proxy for work effort) and on wage rates for all men and for black and low-skilled men separately. The estimates reveal that entering marriage raises hours worked quickly and substantially but that marriage’s effect on wage rates takes place more slowly while men continue in marriage. Together, the stimulus to hours worked and wage rates generates an 18%–19% increase in earnings, with about one-third to one-half of the marriage earnings premium attributable to higher work effort. At the same time, higher wage rates and hours worked encourage men to marry and to stay married. Thus, being married and having high earnings reinforce each other over time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahituv, A. and R. Lerman. 2005. “Job Turnover, Wage Rates, and Marital Stability: How Are They Related?” IZA Discussion Paper No. 1470. Institute for the Study of Labor, Bonn, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antonovics, K.L. and R. Town. 2004. “Are All the Good Men Married? Uncovering the Sources of the Marital Wage Premium.” American Economic Review 94:317–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G.S., E.M. Landes, and R.T. Michael. 1977. “An Economic Analysis of Marital Instability.” Journal of Political Economy 85:1141–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn, M. and S. Korenman. 1994. “The Declining Marital-Status Earnings Differential.” Journal of Population Economics 7:247–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, S., C. Propper, and A. Aassve. 2003. “The Role of Income in Marriage and Divorce Transitions Among Young Americans.” Journal of Population Economics 16:455–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Call, V. and J. Teachman. 1996. “Life-Course Timing and Sequencing of Marriage and Military Service and Their Effects on Marital Stability.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 58:219–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charles, K. and M. Stephens, Jr. 2004. “Job Displacement, Disability, and Divorce.” Journal of Labor Economics 22:489–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chun, H. and I. Lee. 2001. “Why Do Married Men Earn More: Productivity or Marriage Selection?” Economic Inquiry 39(2):307–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornwell, C. and P. Rupert. 1997. “Unobservable Individual Effects, Marriage, and the Earnings of Young Men.” Economic Inquiry 35:285–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daniel, K. 1995. “The Marriage Premium.” Pp. 113–25 in The New Economics of Human Behavior, edited by M. Tommasi and K. Ierulli. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellwood, D. and C. Jencks. 2004. “The Spread of Single-Parent Families in the United States Since 1960.” Pp. 25–65 in The Future of the Family, edited by D.P. Moynihan, T. Smeeding, and L. Rainwater. New York: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. and J. Waldfogel. 1998. “Does Child Support Enforcement Policy Affect Male Labor Supply?” Pp. 94–127 in Fathers Under Fire: The Revolution in Child Support Enforcement, edited by I. Garfinkel, S.S. McLanahan, D.R. Meyer, and J.A. Seltzer. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginther, D. and M. Zavodny. 2001. “Is the Male Marriage Premium Due to Selection? The Effect of Shotgun Weddings on the Return to Marriage.” Journal of Population Economics 14:313–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldin, C. 1990. Understanding the Gender Gap: An Economic History of American Women. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, E. and M. D. Paserman. 2003. “Waiting for Mr. Right: Rising Inequality and Declining Marriage Rates.” Journal of Urban Economics 53:257–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, J.S. 1997. “The Fall in Men’s Return to Marriage: Declining Productivity Effects or Changing Selection?” Journal of Human Resources 32:481–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hersch, J. and L. Stratton. 2000. “Household Specialization and the Male Marriage Wage Premium.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 54:78–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hotz, V.J., L. Xu, M. Tienda, and A. Ahituv. 2002. “Are There Returns to the Wages of Young Men From Working While in School?” Review of Economics and Statistics 84:221–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, L. 1983. “The Accumulation of Human Capital During Marriage by Males.” Economic Inquiry 21:223–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korenman, S. and D. Neumark. 1991. “Does Marriage Really Make Men More Productive?” Journal of Human Resources 26:282–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krashinsky, H. 2004. “Do Marital Status and Computer Usage Really Change the Wage Structure.” Journal of Human Resources 39:774–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerman, R. 2002. “Marriage and the Economic Well-Being of Families With Children: A Review of the Literature.” Report. Urban Institute, Washington, DC. Available online at http://www.urban. org/url.cfm?ID=410541

    Google Scholar 

  • Loh, E.S. 1996. “Productivity Differences and the Marriage Premium for White Males.” Journal of Human Resources 31:566–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loughran, D. 2002. “The Effect of Male Wage Inequality on Female Age at First Marriage.” Review of Economics and Statistics 84:237–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manning, W.D. and P.J. Smock. 1995. “Why Marry? Race and the Transition to Marriage Among Cohabiters.” Demography 32:509–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moffitt, R. 2005. “Remarks on the Analysis of Causal Relationships in Population Research.” Demography 42:91–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neal, D. 2004. “The Relationship Between Marriage Market Prospects and Never-Married Motherhood.” Journal of Human Resources 39:938–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The New York Times, editorial. 2004. “Heartless Marriage Plans.” January 17, p. A14.

  • Nock, S. 2005. “Marriage as a Public Issue.” The Future of Children 15(2):13–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oppenheimer, V.K. 2003. “Cohabiting and Marriage During Young Men’s Career Development Process.” Demography 40:127–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, D. 1977. “Health, Family Structure, and Labor Supply.” American Economic Review 67:703–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Presser, H. 2000. “Nonstandard Work Schedules and Marital Instability.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 62:93–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reed, W.R. and K. Harford. 1989. “The Marriage Premium and Compensating Wage Differentials.” Journal of Population Economics 2:237–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ribar, D. 2004. “What Do Social Scientists Know About the Benefits of Marriage? A Review of Quantitative Methodologies.” IZA Discussion Paper 998. Institute for the Study of Labor, Bonn, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoeni, R. 1995. “Marital Status and Earnings in Developed Countries.” Journal of Population Economics 8:351–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smock, P.J. and W.D. Manning. 1997. “Cohabitation Partners’ Economic Circumstances and Marriage.” Demography 34:331–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stratton, L. 2002. “Examining the Wage Differential for Married and Cohabiting Men.” Economic Inquiry 40:199–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teachman, J.D., V.R.A. Call, and K.P. Carver. 1994. “Marital Status and the Duration of Joblessness Among White Men.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 56:415–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Bureau of the Census. 1994. City-County Data Book: 2000. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis. 2006. Regional Economic Accounts. Available online at http:// www.bea.gov/bea/regional/reis

  • U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2007. Local Area Unemployment Statistics. Available online at http://www.bls.gov.lau

  • Waite, L.J. and M. Gallagher. 2000. The Case for Marriage. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, Y. and R.J. Willis. 1997. “Match Quality, New Information, and Marital Dissolution.” Journal of Labor Economics 15:S293-S329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, C. and A. Oswald. 2005. “How Does Marriage Affect Physical and Psychological Health? A Survey of the Longitudinal Evidence.” IZA Discussion Paper 1619. Institute for the Study of Labor, Bonn, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, W.J. 1987. The Truly Disadvantaged. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, R.G. 1995. “Marriage Rates and Marriageable Men: A Test of the Wilson Hypothesis.” Journal of Human Resources 30:163–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert I. Lerman.

Additional information

The authors thank the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development for funding this research under a grant to the Urban Institute (RO 3 HD043994-01); the IZA for hosting the authors during the writing of this paper; Henry Chen for excellent research assistance; and David Ribar, David Neumark, the editors, and anonymous referees for constructive comments.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ahituv, A., Lerman, R.I. How do marital status, work effort, and wage rates interact?. Demography 44, 623–647 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1353/dem.2007.0021

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/dem.2007.0021

Keywords

Navigation