Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

As low birth weight babies grow, can well-educated parents buffer this adverse factor? A research note

  • Published:
Demography

Abstract

This research note combines two national Taiwanese data sets to investigate the relationships among low birth weight (LBW) babies, their parents’ educational levels, and their future academic outcomes. We find that LBW is negatively correlated with the probability of such children attending college at age 18; however, when both parents are college or high school graduates, such negative effects may be partially offset. We also show that discrimination against daughters occurs, but only for daughters who were LBW babies. Moreover, high parental education can buffer the LBW shock only among moderately LBW children (as compared with very LBW children) and full-term LBW children (as compared with preterm LBW children).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Almond, D., K. Chay, and D. Lee. 2005. “The Costs of Low Birth Weight.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 121:1031–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. 1981. A Treatise on the Family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Behrman, J. and M. Rosenzweig. 2004. “Returns to Birth Weight.” Review of Economics and Statistics 86:586–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boardman, J.D., D.A. Powers, Y.C. Padilla, and R.A. Hummer. 2002. “Low Birth Weight, Social Factors and Development Outcomes Among Children in the United States.” Demography 39:353–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonjour D., L.F. Cherkas, J.E. Haskel, D.D. Hawkes, and T.D. Spector. 2003. “Returns to Education: Evidence From U.K. Twins.” American Economic Review 93:1799–812.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breslau, N., J.E. DelDotto, G.G. Brown, S. Kumar, S. Ezhuthachan, K.G. Hufnagle, and E.L. Peterson. 1994. “A Gradient Relationship Between Low Birth Weight and IQ at Age 6 Years.” Archives of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine 148:377–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinton, M. 1988. “The Social-Institutional Bases of Gender Stratification: Japan as an Illustrative Case.” American Journal of Sociology 94:300–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1993. Women and the Economic Miracle: Gender and Work in Postwar Japan. Berkley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conley, D. and N. Bennett. 2000. “Is Biology Destiny? Birth Weight and Life Chances.” American Sociological Review 65:458–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Currie, J. and R. Hyson. 1999. “Is the Impact of Health Shocks Cushioned by Socioeconomic Status? The Case of Low Birth Weight.” American Economic Review 89:245–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenhalgh, S. 1985. “Sexual Stratification: The Other Side of ‘Growth With Equity’ in East Asia.” Population and Development Review 11:265–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hack, M., D. Flannery, M. Schluchter, L. Carter, E. Borawski, and N. Klein. 2002. “Outcomes in Young Adulthood for Very Low Birth Weight Infants.” New England Journal of Medicine 346(3):149–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kandel, E. and S.A. Mednick. 1991. “Perinatal Complications Predict Violent Offending.” Criminology 29:519–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCormick, M.C., J. Brooks-Gunn, K. Workman-Daniels, J. Turner, and G.J. Peckham. 1992. “The Health and Developmental Status of Very Low Birth Weight Children at School Age.” Journal of the American Medical Association 267(16):2204–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parish, W.L. and R.J. Willis. 1993. “Daughters, Education and Family Budgets—Taiwan Experiences.” Journal of Human Resources 28:863–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perlman, J. 2001. “Neurobehavioral Deficits in Premature Graduates of Intensive Care—Potential Medical and Neonatal Environmental Risk Factors.” Pediatrics 108:1339–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raine, A., P. Brennan, and S.A. Mednick. 1994. “Birth Complications Combined With Early Maternal Rejection at Age 1 Year Predispose to Violent Crime at Age 18 Years.” Archives of General Psychiatry 51:984–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tibbetts, S. and A. Piquero. 1999. “The Influence of Gender, Low Birth Weight and Disadvantaged Environment in Predicting Early Onset of Offending: A Test of Moffitt’s Interactional Hypothesis.” Criminology 37:843–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, W.H. and K.S. Su. 2006. “Gender, Sibship Structure, and Educational Inequality in Taiwan: Son Preference Revisited.” Journal of Marriage and Family 68:1057–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Economics, National Taiwan University, No. 21, Hsu-Chow Road, Taipei, Taiwan

    Ming-Jen Lin

  2. Department of Economics, National Taiwan University and National Bureau of Economic Research, Taiwan

    Jin-Tan Liu

  3. Department of Economics, Lehigh University, and National Bureau of Economic Research, Taiwan

    Shin-Yi Chou

Authors
  1. Ming-Jen Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jin-Tan Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Shin-Yi Chou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

We are grateful for the valuable comments by two anonymous referees and the editors. All remaining errors are ours.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lin, MJ., Liu, JT. & Chou, SY. As low birth weight babies grow, can well-educated parents buffer this adverse factor? A research note. Demography 44, 335–343 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1353/dem.2007.0013

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/dem.2007.0013

Keywords

Search

Navigation