Advertisement

Demography

, Volume 44, Issue 2, pp 405–426 | Cite as

The phoenix population: Demographic crisis and rebound in Cambodia

  • Patrick Heuveline
  • Bunnak Poch
Article

Abstract

The study of mortality crises provides an unusual and valuable perspective on the relationship between mortality and fertility changes, a relationship that has puzzled demographers for decades. In this article, we combine nationally representative survey and demographic-surveillance system data to study fertility trends around the time of the Khmer Rouge (KR) regime, under which 25% of the Cambodian population died. We present the first quantitative evidence to date that attests to a one-third decline of fertility during this regime, followed by a substantial “baby boom” after the fall of the KR. Further analyses reveal that the fertility rebound was produced not only by a two-year marriage bubble but also by a surge in marital fertility that remained for nearly a decade above its precrisis level. Our results illustrate the potential influence of mortality on fertility, which may be more difficult to identify for more gradual mortality declines. To the extent that until recently, Cambodian fertility appears to fit natural fertility patterns, our findings also reinforce recent qualifications about the meaning of this core paradigm of demographic analysis

Keywords

Total Fertility Rate Fertility Decline Marriage Rate Marital Fertility Mortality Decline 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agadjanian, V. and N. Prata. 2002. “War, Peace, and Fertility in Angola.” Demography 39:215–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alter, G. 1992. “Theories of Fertility Decline: A Non-Specialist’s Guide to the Current Debate.” Pp. 13–27 in The European Experience of Declining Fertility, 1850–1970: The Quiet Revolution, edited by J.R. Gillis, L.A. Tilly, and D. Levine. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  3. Anderton, D.L. and L.L. Bean. 1985. “Birth Spacing and Fertility Limitations: A Behavioral Analysis of a Nineteenth-Century Frontier Population.” Demography 22:169–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ashton, B., K. Hill, A. Piazza, and R. Zeitz. 1984. “Famine in China, 1958–61.” Population and Development Review 10:613–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blanc, A. 2004. “The Role of Conflict in the Rapid Fertility Decline in Eritrea and Prospects for the Future.” Studies in Family Planning 35(4):236–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brass, W. 1975. “Methods for Estimating Fertility and Mortality From Limited and Defective Data.” Based on seminars held September 16-24, 1971, at the Centro Latino Americo De Demografia (Celade), San Jose, Costa Rica. Carolina Population Center, Laboratories for Population Studies, Chapel Hill, NC.Google Scholar
  7. Charbonneau, H., B. Desjardins, J. Légaré, and H. Denis. 2000. “The Population of the St. Lawrence Valley, 1608–1760.” Pp. 99–142 in A Population History of North America, edited by M.R. Haines and R.H. Steckel. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Cleland, J. 2001. “The Effects of Improved Survival on Fertility: A Reassessment.” Pp. 60–92 in Global Fertility Transition, a Supplement to Population and Development Review, Vol. 27, edited by R.A. Bulatao and J.B. Casterline. New York: Population Council.Google Scholar
  9. Davis, K. 1963. “The Theory of Change and Response in Modern Demographic History.” Population Index 29:345–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Easterlin, R. 1976. “Population Change and Farm Settlement in the Northern United States.” Journal of Economic History 36(1):45–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Eversley, D.E.C. 1957. “A Survey of Population in an Area of Worcestershire From 1660–1850 on the Basis of Parish Records.” Population Studies 10:253–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fargues, P. 2000. “Protracted National Conflict and Fertility Change: Palestinians and Israelis in the Twentieth Century.” Population and Development Review 26:441–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Festy, P. 1984. “Effets et répercutions de la première guerre mondiale sur la fécondité française” [Direct and indirect effects of World War I on French fertility]. Population 39:977–1010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Henry, L. 1961. “Some Data on Natural Fertility.” Eugenics Quarterly 8(2):81–91.Google Scholar
  15. Heuveline, P. 1998. “‘Between One and Three Million’: Towards the Demographic Reconstruction of a Decade of Cambodian History (1970–79).” Population Studies 52:49–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. —. 1999. “The Global and Regional Impact of Mortality and Fertility Transitions, 1950–2000.” Population and Development Review 25:681–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. —. 2001. “Demographic Pressure, Economic Development, and Social Engineering: An Assessment of Fertility Declines in the Second Half of the Twentieth Century.” Population Research and Policy Review 20:365–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Heuveline, P. and B. Poch. 2006. “Do Marriages Forget Their Past? Marital Stability in Post-Khmer Rouge Cambodia.” Demography 43:99–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hill, K. 2004. War, Humanitarian Crises, Population Displacement, and Fertility: A Review of the Evidence. Roundtable on the Demography of Forced Migration, Committee on Population, National Research Council and Program on Forced Migration and Health at the Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  20. Hirschman, C. 1994. “Why Fertility Changes?” Annual Review of Sociology 20:203–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Holck, S.E. and W. Cates. 1982. “Fertility and Population Dynamics in Two Kampuchean Refugee Camps.” Studies in Family Planning 13(4):118–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Huguet, J. 1992. “The Demographic Situation in Cambodia.” Asia-Pacific Population Journal 6(4):79–91.Google Scholar
  23. Kiernan, B. 1996. The Pol Pot Regime. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Kiernan, B. and C. Boua. 1982. Peasants and Politics in Kampuchea, 1942–1981. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
  25. Kirk, D. 1996. “Demographic Transition Theory.” Population Studies 50:361–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lee, R.D. 1997. “Population Dynamics: Equilibrium, Disequilibrium, and Consequences of Fluctuations.” Handbook of Population and Family Economics, Vol. 1B, edited by M.R. Rosenzweig and O. Stark. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science B.V.Google Scholar
  27. LeGrand, T.K. and M. Barbieri. 2002. “The Possible Effects of Child Survival on Women’s Ages at First Union and Childbirth in Sub-Saharan Africa.” European Journal of Population 18:361–86.Google Scholar
  28. LeGrand, T.K. and J. Sandberg. 2006. “Effects of Child Mortality on Fertility: Theoretical Complexities and Measurement Difficulties.” Pp. 181–206 in Entre nature et culture: Quelle(s) demographie(s)?, edited by M. loriaux and E. Vilquin. Chaire Quetelet 2002. Louvain-la-Neuve: Academia-Bruylant/L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
  29. Lesthaeghe, R. 1980. “On the Social Control of Human Reproduction.” Population and Development Review 6:527–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lindstrom, D.P. and B. Berhanu. 1999. “The Impact of War, Famine, and Economic Decline on Marital Fertility in Ethiopia.” Demography 36:247–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mason, K.O. 1997. “Explaining Fertility Transitions.” Demography 34:443–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Migozzi, J. 1973. Cambodge: faits et problèmes de population [Cambodia: Population facts and problems]. Paris: Editions du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique.Google Scholar
  33. Montgomery, M.R. 1998. “Learning and Lags in Mortality Perceptions.” Pp. 112–37 in From Death to Birth: Mortality Decline and Reproductive Change, edited by M.R. Montgomery and B. Cohen. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  34. Montgomery, M.R. and B. Cohen, eds. 1998. From Death to Birth: Mortality Decline and Reproductive Change. Washington, DC: National Academic Press.Google Scholar
  35. National Institute of Statistics (NIS). 1999. General Population Census of Cambodia 1998: Final Census Results. Phnom Penh, Cambodia: United Nations Population Fund for the National Institute of Statistics, Ministry of Planning.Google Scholar
  36. —. 2001. Cambodia Demographic and Health Survey 2000. Phnom Penh, Cambodia, and Calverton, MD, USA: National Institute of Statistics, Directorate General for Health [Cambodia], and ORC Macro.Google Scholar
  37. Ngor, H. 1987. A Cambodian Odyssey. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  38. Notestein, F.W. 1945. “Population—The Long View.” Pp. 36–57 Food for the World, edited by T.W. Schultz. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  39. —. 1953. “Economic Problems of Population Change.” Pp. 13–31 in Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference of Agricultural Economists. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Palloni, A., K. Hill, and G. Pinto Aguirre. 1996. “Economic Swings and Demographic Changes in the History of Latin America.” Population Studies 50:105–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Palloni, A. and H. Rafalimanana. 1999. “The Effects of Infant Mortality on Fertility Revisited: New Evidence From Latin America.” Demography 36:41–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ponchaud, F. [1977]1998. Cambodge année zero [Cambodia: Year zero]. Paris: Kailash Editions.Google Scholar
  43. Preston, S.H., ed. 1978. The Effect of Infant and Child Mortality on Fertility. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  44. Rindfuss, R.R., J. Palmore, and L.L. Bumpass. 1982. “Selectivity and the Analysis of Birth Intervals With Survey Data.” Asian and Pacific Census Forum 8(3):5–16.Google Scholar
  45. Robinson, W.C. 1998. Terms of Refuge: The Indochinese Exodus and the International Response. New York: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  46. Sheps, M. and J. Menken. 1973. Mathematical Models of Conception and Birth. Chicago: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  47. Siampos, G.S. 1970. “The Population of Cambodia, 1945–1980.” Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly 48:317–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sliwinski, M. 1995. Le génocide Khmer Rouge: une analyse démographique [The Khmer Rouge Genocide: A Demographic Analysis]. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
  49. Van Bavel, J. 2003. “Does an Effect of Marriage Duration on Pre-Transition Fertility Signal Parity-Dependent Control? An Empirical Test in Nineteenth-Century Leuven, Belgium.” Population Studies 57:55–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. VanLandingham, M. and C. Hirschman. 2001. “Population Pressure and Fertility in Pre-Transition Thailand.” Population Studies 55:233–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Watkins, S.C. and J. Menken. 1985. “Famines in Historical Perspective.” Population and Development Review 11:647–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Weitz, E.D. 2003. A Century of Genocide: Utopias of Race and Nation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of ChicagoUSA
  2. 2.Center for Population StudiesRoyal University of Phnom PenhUSA
  3. 3.Population Research CenterNORCChicago

Personalised recommendations