Abstract
We use marriage matching functions to study how marital patterns change when population supplies change. Specifically, we use a behavioral marriage matching function with spillover effects to rationalize marriage and cohabitation behavior in contemporary Canada. The model can estimate a couple’s systematic gains to marriage and cohabitation relative to remaining single. These gains are invariant to changes in population supplies. Instead, changes in population supplies redistribute these gains between a couple. Although the model is behavioral, it is nonparametric. It cant any observed cross-sectional marriage matching distribution. We use the estimated model to quantify the impacts of gender differences in mortality rates and the baby boom on observed marital behavior in Canada. The higher mortality rate of men makes men scarcer than women. We show that the scarceness of men modestly reduced the welfare of women and increased the welfare of men in the marriage market. On the other hand, the baby boom increased older men’s net gains to entering the marriage market and lowered middle-aged women’s net gains
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Becker, G.S. 1973. “A Theory of Marriage: Part I.” Journal of Political Economy 81:813–46.
— 1974. “A Theory of Marriage: Part II.” Journal of Political Economy 82:S11-S26.
Bhrolcháin, M. Ní. 2001. “Flexibility in the Marriage Market.” Population: An English Selection 13(2):9–47.
Choo, E., S. Seitz, and A. Siow. 2006. “Marriage Matching, Fertility and Spousal Labor Supplies.” Unpublished manuscript. Department of Economics, University of Toronto.
Choo, E., and A. Siow. 2005. “Lifecycle Marriage Matching: Theory and Evidence.” Unpublished manuscript. Department of Economics, University of Toronto.
—. 2006. “Who Marries Whom and Why.” Journal of Political Economy 114:175–201.
Dagsvik, J.K. 2000. “Aggregation in Matching Markets.” International Economic Review 41(1): 27–57.
Kalmijn, M. 1991a. “Trends in Religious and Educational Homogamy.” American Sociological Review 56:786–800.
— 1991b. “Status Homogamy in the United States.” American Journal of Sociology 97: 496–523.
— 1993. “Marriage Selection Among the Children of European Immigrants: A Comparison of Marriage Cohorts in the 1960 Census.” International Migration Review 27:51–78.
Mare, R.D. 1991. “Five Decades of Educational Assortative Mating.” American Sociological Review 56:15–32.
McFadden, D. 1974. “Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behavior.” Pp. 105–42 in Frontiers in Econometrics, edited by P. Zarembka. New York: Academic Press.
McFarland, D.D. 1972. “Comparison of Alternative Marriage Models.” Pp. 89–106 in Population Dynamics, edited by T. Greville. New York: Academic Press.
Pollak, R. 1990a. “Two-Sex Demographic Models.” Journal of Political Economy 98:399–420.
— 1990b. “Two-Sex Population Models and Classical Stable Population Theory.” Pp. 317–33 in Convergent Issues in Genetics and Demography, edited by J. Adams, D.A. Lam, A.I. Hermalin, and P.E. Smouse. New York: Oxford University Press.
Pollard, J.H. 1997. “Modelling the Interaction Between the Sexes.” Mathematical and Computer Modelling 26(6):11–24.
Pollard, J.H. and C. Höhn. 1993–1994. “The Interaction Between the Sexes.” Zeitschrift fur Bevolkerungswissenschaft 19(2):203–208.
Qian, Z.C. 1997. “Breaking the Racial Barriers: Variations in Interracial Marriage Between 1980 and 1990.” Demography 34:263–76.
— 1998. “Changes in Assortative Mating: The Impact of Age and Education, 1970–1990.” Demography 35:279–92.
Qian, Z.C. and S. Preston. 1993. “Changes in American Marriage, 1972 to 1987: Availability and Forces of Attraction by Age and Education.” American Sociological Review 58:482–95.
Rosenfeld, M.J. 2001. “The Salience of Pan-National Hispanic and Asian Identities in U.S. Marriage Markets.” Demography 38:161–75.
Schoen, R. 1981. “The Harmonic Mean as the Basis of a Realistic Two-Sex Marriage Model.” Demography 18:201–16.
Siow, A. 1998. “Differential Fecundity, Markets and Gender Roles.” Journal of Political Economy 106:334–54.
Statistics Canada. 2002. Life Tables, Canada, Provinces and Territories. Catalog no. 84-537-XIE.
Wilson, W.J. 1987. The Truly Disadvantaged. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Wu, Z. 2000. Cohabitation: An Alternative Form of Family Living. Toronto: Oxford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
We thank Alina Rahman and Icarus Lee for assistance on the research presented in this article. We benefited from comments from Joanne Roberts. We are also grateful to the editors and referees for their suggestions and patience. The second author also gratefully acknowledges financial support from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Choo, E., Siow, A. Estimating a marriage matching model with spillover effects. Demography 43, 463–490 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1353/dem.2006.0023
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/dem.2006.0023