Residential father family type and child well-being: Investment versus selection

Demography volume 43, pages 53–77 (2006)Cite this article

Abstract

This research links residence with biological and nonbiological married and unmarried parents to the cognitive achievement and behavioral problems of children aged 3–12, controlling for factors that make such families different. The data were drawn from the 1997 Child Development Supplement to the Panel Study of Income Dynamics. Achievement differences were not associated with father family structure per se, but with demographic and economic factors that differ across families. In contrast, behavioral problems were linked to family structure even after controls for measured and unmeasured factors were included. Children in all family types except the married-biological-parent family showed higher levels of behavioral problems. Paternal and maternal engagement time explained some of the differences in behavioral problems across families. Although children in blended families tended to achieve at lower levels than those not in blended families, stepchildren in blended families achieved at levels comparable to those of half-siblings. Finally, children in blended families tended to have fewer behavioral problems than those not in blended families.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Amato, P.R. and B. Keith. 1991. “Parental Divorce and the Well-being of Children: A Meta-Analysis.” Psychological Bulletin 110:26–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Amato, P.R. and F. Rivera. 1999. “Paternal Involvement and Children’s Behavior Problems.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 61:375–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Anderson, K.G. 2000. “The Life Histories of American Stepfathers in Evolutionary Perspective.” Human Nature 11(4):307–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Anderson, K.G., H. Kaplan, and J.B. Lancaster. 2001. Men’s Financial Expenditures on Genetic Children and Stepchildren From Current and Former Relationships. Population Studies Center Research Report No. 01-484. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Astone, N.M. and S.S. McLanahan. 1991. “Family Structure, Parental Practices, and High School Completion.” American Sociological Review 56:309–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Berger, P.L. and T. Luckmann. 1966. The Social Construction of Reality. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bernhardt, E. and F. Goldscheider. 2001. “Who Lives in a Family? The Determinants of Union and Parental Status in Sweden and the United States.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 63:793–803.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Brooks-Gunn, J., B. Brown, G.J. Duncan, and K.A. Moore. 1995. “Child Development in the Context of Family and Community Resources: An Agenda for National Data Collection.” Pp. 27–97 in Integrating Federal Statistics on Children: Report of a Workshop, edited by Board on Children and Families. Washington, DC: National Research Council.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Brown, S. 2004. “Family Structure and Child Well-being: The Significance of Parental Cohabitation.” Journal of Marriage and Family 66:351–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Buchanan, C.M., E.E. Maccoby, and S.M. Dornbusch. 1996. Adolescents After Divorce. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Case, A., I.-F. Lin, and S. McLanahan. 2001. “Educational Attainment of Siblings in Stepfamilies.” Evolution and Human Behavior 22:269–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cherlin, A. 1978. “Remarriage as an Incomplete Institution.” American Journal of Sociology 84:634–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Coleman, M., L.H. Ganong, and S.M. Cable. 1996. “Perceptions of Stepparents: An Examination of the Incomplete Institutionalization and Social Stigma Hypotheses.” Journal of Divorce and Remarriage 26(1/2):25–48.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Coleman, M., L. Ganong, and M. Fine. 2000. “Reinvestigating Remarriage: Another Decade of Progress.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 62:1288–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Cooksey, E.C. and M. Fondell. 1996. “Spending Time With His Kids: Effects of Family Structure on Fathers’ and Children’s Lives.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 58:693–707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Daly, M. and M. Wilson. 1998. The Truth About Cinderella: A Darwinian View of Parental Love. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Dunn, J., L.C. Davies, T.G. O’Connor, and W. Sturgess. 2000. “Parents’ and Partners’ Life Course and Family Experiences: Links With Parent-Child Relationships in Different Family Settings.” Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 41:955–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Dunn, J., K. Deater-Deckard, K. Pickering, T.G. O’Connor, and J. Golding. 1998. “Children’s Adjustment and Prosocial Behaviour in Step-, Single-Parent, and Non-Stepfamily Settings.” Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 39:1083–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Elder, G.H., Jr. and A. Caspi. 1988. “Economic Stress in Lives: Developmental Perspectives.” Journal of Social Issues 44(4):25–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Emlen, S. 1995. “An Evolutionary Theory of the Family.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 92:8092–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Evenhouse, E. and S. Reilly. 2004. “A Sibling Study of Stepchild Well-being.” Journal of Human Resources 39:248–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Fawcett, J.T. 1983. “Perceptions of the Value of Children: Satisfactions and Costs.” Pp. 429–57 in Determinants of Fertility in Developing Countries, Vol.1: Supply and Demand for Children, edited by R. Bulatao and R. Lee. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Fields, J. 2001. “Living Arrangements of Children.” Current Population Reports, Series P70, No. 74. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Fine, M.A. 1995. “The Clarity and Content of the Stepparent Role: A Review of the Literature.” Journal of Divorce & Remarriage 24(1/2):19–34.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Fitzgerald, J., P. Gottschalk, and R. Moffitt. 1998. “An Analysis of Sample Attrition in Panel Data: The Michigan Panel Study of Income Dynamics.” Journal of Human Resources 33: 251–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing. 2000. “Dispelling Myths About Unmarried Fathers.” Fragile Families Research Brief No. 1. Bendheim-Thoman Center for Research on Child Wellbeing, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ginther, D.K. and R.A. Pollak. 2004. “Family Structure and Children’s Educational Outcomes: Blended Families, Stylized Facts, and Descriptive Regressions.” Demography 41:671–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Guo, G. 1996. “Parents’ Labor Force Attachment and Grade Retention Among Urban Black Children.” Sociology of Education 69:217–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Hanson, T.L., S.S. McLanahan, and E. Thomson. 1996. “Double Jeopardy: Parental Conflict and Stepfamily Outcomes for Children.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 58:141–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Hetherington, E.M. and W.G. Clingempeel. 1992. “Coping With Marital Transitions: A Family Systems Perspective.” Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 57(2–3, Serial No. 227).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Hetherington, E.M. and K. Jodl. 1994. “Stepfamilies as Settings for Child Development.” Pp. 55–79 in Stepfamilies: Who Benefits? Who Does Not?, edited by A. Booth and J. Dunn. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Hofferth, S. 1998. Healthy Environments, Healthy Children: Children in Families. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Hofferth, S. Forthcoming. “Response Bias in a Popular Indicator of Reading to Children.” Sociological Methodology.

  34. Hofferth, S.L. and K.G. Anderson. 2003. “Are All Dads Equal? Biology Versus Marriage as Basis for Paternal Investment.” Journal of Marriage and Family 65:213–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Hofferth, S., P.E. Davis-Kean, J. Davis, and J. Finkelstein. 1999. 1997 User Guide: The Child Development Supplement to the Panel Study of Income Dynamics. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research, The University of Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Hofferth, S.L., J. Pleck, J.L. Stueve, S. Bianchi, and L. Sayer. 2002. “The Demography of Fathers: What Fathers Do.” Pp. 63–90 in Handbook of Father Involvement, edited by C.S. Tamis-LeMonda and N. Cabrera. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Hofferth, S.L. and J.F. Sandberg. 2001. “How American Children Spend Their Time.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 63:295–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Hogan, D.P. and F. Goldscheider. 2001. “Men’s Flight From Children in the U.S.: A Historical Perspective.” Pp. 173–91 in Children at the Millennium: Where Have We Come From, Where Are We Going?, edited by S.L. Hofferth and T.J. Owens. Oxford, England: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Juster, F.T. and F.P. Stafford. 1985. Time, Goods, and Well-being. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Kowaleski-Jones, L. and G.J. Duncan. 1999. “The Structure of Achievement and Behavior Across Middle Childhood.” Child Development 70:930–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Kreider, R.M. and J.M. Fields. 2002. “Number, Timing, and Duration of Marriages and Divorces: 1996.” Current Population Reports, Series P70, No. 80. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Lillard, L. and L. Waite. 1993. “A Joint Model of Marital Childbearing and Marital Disruption.” Demography 30:653–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Maccoby, E. and J. Martin. 1983. “Socialization in the Context of the Family: Parent-Child Interaction.” Pp. 1–101 in Handbook of Child Psychology, Vol. IV, edited by E.M. Hetherington. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Manning, W. and D. Lichter. 1996. “Parental Cohabitation and Children’s Economic Well-being.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 58:998–1010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Manning, W., P. Smock, and D. Majumdar. 2004. “The Relative Stability of Cohabiting and Marital Unions for Children.” Population Research and Policy Review 6:135–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Marsiglio, W. 2004. Stepdads: Stories of Love, Hope, and Repair. Boulder, CO: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  47. McLanahan, S. and G. Sandefur. 1994. Growing Up With a Single Parent: What Hurts, What Helps. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  48. McLoyd, V.C. 1990. “The Impact of Economic Hardship on Black Families and Children: Psychological Distress, Parenting, and Socioemotional Development.” Child Development 61:311–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. NICHD Early Child Care Research Network. 2004. Trajectories of Physical Aggression From Toddlerhood to Middle Childhood: Predictors, Correlates, and Outcomes. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development Series 278, Vol. 69, No. 4. Boston, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Osborne, C. and S. McLanahan. 2004. “The Effects of Partnership Instability on Parenting and Young Children’s Health and Behavior.” Presented at the Association of Public Policy Analysis and Management, Atlanta, GA, October 28–30.

  51. Peterson, J.L. and N. Zill. 1986. “Marital Disruption, Parent-Child Relationships, and Behavioral Problems in Children.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 48:295–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Rogers, S.J., T.L. Parcel, and E.G. Menaghan. 1991. “The Effects of Maternal Working Conditions and Mastery on Child Behavior Problems.” Journal of Health and Social Behavior 32:145–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Rumberger, R.W. 1987. “High School Dropouts: A Review of Issues and Evidence.” Review of Educational Research 57:101–21.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Sandberg, J.F. and S.L. Hofferth. 2001. “Changes in Parental Time With Children.” Demography 38:423–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Sassler, S. and F. Goldscheider. 2004. “Revisiting Jane Austen’s Theory of Marriage Timing: Changes in Union Formation Among American Men in the Late 20th Century.” Journal of Family Issues 25:139–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Seltzer, J.A. 2000. “Families Formed Outside of Marriage.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 62:1247–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Teachman, J.D., L.M. Tedrow, and K.D. Crowder. 2000. “The Changing Demography of America’s Families.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 62:1234–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Thomson, E., T.L. Hanson, and S. McLanahan. 1994. “Family Structure and Child Well-being: Economic Resources vs. Parental Behaviors.” Social Forces 73:221–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Timmer, S.G., J. Eccles, and K. O’Brien. 1985. “How Children Use Time.” Pp. 353–82 in Time, Goods, and Well-Being, edited by F.T. Juster and F.P. Stafford. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Visher, E. and J.S. Visher. 1988. Old Loyalties, New Ties. New York: Brunner/Mazel.

    Google Scholar 

  61. White, L. 1994. “Growing Up With Single Parents and Stepparents: Long Term Effects on Family Solidarity.” Journal or Marriage and the Family 56:935–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Woodcock, R. and N. Mather. 1989. W-J-R Tests of Achievement: Examiner’s Manual. Allen, TX: DLM Teaching Resources. R.W. Woodcock and M.B. Johnson, Woodcock-Johnson Psycho-Educational Battery, Revised.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Yeung, W.J., J. Sandberg, P.E. Davis-Kean, and S.L. Hofferth. 2001. “Children’s Time With Fathers in Intact Families.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 63:136–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Zill, N., D.R. Morrison, and M.J. Coiro. 1993. “Long-Term Effects of Parental Divorce on Parent-Child Relationships, Adjustment, and Achievement in Young Adulthood.” Journal of Family Psychology 7:91–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Family Studies, University of Maryland, 1201 Marie Mount Hall, 20742, College Park, MD

    Sandra L. Hofferth

Authors
  1. Sandra L. Hofferth
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Funding for this research was provided under a grant from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) to members of the NICHD Family and Child Well-being Research Network.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hofferth, S.L. Residential father family type and child well-being: Investment versus selection. Demography 43, 53–77 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1353/dem.2006.0006

Download citation

Keywords

  • Behavioral Problem
  • Family Type
  • Biological Father
  • Biological Child
  • Nonresidential Father